Function 2
has 297 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],2:[function(require,module,exports){
(function (setImmediate){(function (){
'use strict';
/**
File promise.js
has 511 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**!
* Promise Polyfill version 8.3.0
* (browserified with Browserify version 17.0.0)
*
* MIT License
Function 1
has 149 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function(f){if(typeof exports==="object"&&typeof module!=="undefined"){module.exports=f()}else if(typeof define==="function"&&define.amd){define([],f)}else{var g;if(typeof window!=="undefined"){g=window}else if(typeof global!=="undefined"){g=global}else if(typeof self!=="undefined"){g=self}else{g=this}g.promise = f()}})(function(){var define,module,exports;return (function(){function r(e,n,t){function o(i,f){if(!n[i]){if(!e[i]){var c="function"==typeof require&&require;if(!f&&c)return c(i,!0);if(u)return u(i,!0);var a=new Error("Cannot find module '"+i+"'");throw a.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",a}var p=n[i]={exports:{}};e[i][0].call(p.exports,function(r){var n=e[i][1][r];return o(n||r)},p,p.exports,r,e,n,t)}return n[i].exports}for(var u="function"==typeof require&&require,i=0;i<t.length;i++)o(t[i]);return o}return r})()({1:[function(require,module,exports){
// shim for using process in browser
var process = module.exports = {};
// cached from whatever global is present so that test runners that stub it
Function 3
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{"timers":3}],3:[function(require,module,exports){
(function (setImmediate,clearImmediate){(function (){
var nextTick = require('process/browser.js').nextTick;
var apply = Function.prototype.apply;
var slice = Array.prototype.slice;
Function allSettled
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function allSettled(arr) {
var P = this;
return new P(function(resolve, reject) {
if (!(arr && typeof arr.length !== 'undefined')) {
return reject(
Function all
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Promise.all = function(arr) {
return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
if (!isArray(arr)) {
return reject(new TypeError('Promise.all accepts an array'));
}
Function any
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function any(arr) {
var P = this;
return new P(function(resolve, reject) {
if (!(arr && typeof arr.length !== 'undefined')) {
return reject(new TypeError('Promise.any accepts an array'));
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return cachedClearTimeout.call(this, marker);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return cachedSetTimeout.call(this, fun, 0);
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(function(f){if(typeof exports==="object"&&typeof module!=="undefined"){module.exports=f()}else if(typeof define==="function"&&define.amd){define([],f)}else{var g;if(typeof window!=="undefined"){g=window}else if(typeof global!=="undefined"){g=global}else if(typeof self!=="undefined"){g=self}else{g=this}g.promise = f()}})(function(){var define,module,exports;return (function(){function r(e,n,t){function o(i,f){if(!n[i]){if(!e[i]){var c="function"==typeof require&&require;if(!f&&c)return c(i,!0);if(u)return u(i,!0);var a=new Error("Cannot find module '"+i+"'");throw a.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",a}var p=n[i]={exports:{}};e[i][0].call(p.exports,function(r){var n=e[i][1][r];return o(n||r)},p,p.exports,r,e,n,t)}return n[i].exports}for(var u="function"==typeof require&&require,i=0;i<t.length;i++)o(t[i]);return o}return r})()({1:[function(require,module,exports){
// shim for using process in browser
var process = module.exports = {};
// cached from whatever global is present so that test runners that stub it
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1234.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76