Showing 20 of 20 total issues
Method foreign_keys
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def foreign_keys(table, stream)
if (foreign_keys = @connection.foreign_keys(table)).any?
add_foreign_key_statements = foreign_keys.map do |foreign_key|
from_table = if foreign_key.from_schema && foreign_key.from_schema != 'public'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method indexes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def indexes(table_name)
scope = quoted_scope(table_name)
result = query(<<-SQL, "SCHEMA")
SELECT distinct i.relname, d.indisunique, d.indkey, pg_get_indexdef(d.indexrelid), t.oid,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method indexes
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def indexes(table_name)
scope = quoted_scope(table_name)
result = query(<<-SQL, "SCHEMA")
SELECT distinct i.relname, d.indisunique, d.indkey, pg_get_indexdef(d.indexrelid), t.oid,
Method create_trigger
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_trigger(table_name, proc_name, event, options = {})
proc_name = "#{proc_name}"
proc_name = "#{proc_name}()" unless proc_name.end_with?(')')
for_each = options[:for_each] || 'ROW'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method triggers
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def triggers
res = select_all <<-SQL
SELECT n.nspname as schema,
c.relname as table,
t.tgname as trigger_name,
Method functions
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def functions
pg_major = ::PgSaurus::Engine.pg_server_version[0]
res = select_all <<-SQL
SELECT n.nspname AS "Schema",
p.proname AS "Name",
Method index_exists?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index_exists?(table_name, column_name, options = {})
column_names = Array.wrap(column_name)
index_name = options.key?(:name) ? options[:name].to_s : index_name(table_name, column: column_names)
# Always compare the index name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method foreign_keys
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def foreign_keys(table_name)
namespace = table_name.to_s.split('.').first
table_name = table_name.to_s.split('.').last
namespace = if namespace == table_name
Method dump_triggers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dump_triggers(stream)
@connection.triggers.each do |trigger|
statement = " create_trigger '#{trigger.table}', '#{trigger.proc_name}', '#{trigger.event}', " \
"name: '#{trigger.name}', " \
"constraint: #{trigger.constraint ? :true : :false}, " \
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index_parts
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index_parts(index)
is_json_index = index.columns.is_a?(String) && index.columns =~ /^(.+->.+)$/
index_parts = [
index.columns.inspect,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method foreign_keys
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def foreign_keys(table, stream)
if (foreign_keys = @connection.foreign_keys(table)).any?
add_foreign_key_statements = foreign_keys.map do |foreign_key|
from_table = if foreign_key.from_schema && foreign_key.from_schema != 'public'
Method split_expression
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def split_expression(expression)
result = []
parens = 0
buffer = ""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_foreign_key
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_foreign_key(from_table, to_table, options = {})
exclude_index = (options.has_key?(:exclude_index) ? options.delete(:exclude_index) : false)
column = options[:column] || foreign_key_column_for(to_table)
if index_exists?(from_table, column) && !exclude_index
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index_name(table_name, options) #:nodoc:
if Hash === options # legacy support
if options[:column]
column_names = Array.wrap(options[:column]).map {|c| expression_index_name(c)}
"index_#{table_name}_on_#{column_names * '_and_'}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_index(table_name, column_name, options = {})
creation_method = options.delete(:concurrently) ? 'CONCURRENTLY' : nil
# Whether to skip the quoting of columns. Used only for expressions like JSON indexes in which
# the column is difficult to target for quoting.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method triggers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def triggers
res = select_all <<-SQL
SELECT n.nspname as schema,
c.relname as table,
t.tgname as trigger_name,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tables
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tables(stream)
super(stream)
# Dump table and column comments
@connection.tables.sort.each do |table_name|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method functions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def functions
pg_major = ::PgSaurus::Engine.pg_server_version[0]
res = select_all <<-SQL
SELECT n.nspname AS "Schema",
p.proname AS "Name",
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_function_volatility
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_function_volatility(function_str)
rows = function_str.split("\n")
lang_index = rows.index { |line| line =~ /LANGUAGE/ }
def_index = rows.index { |line| line =~ /AS \$function\$/ }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method dump_comments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dump_comments(table_name, stream)
unless (comments = @connection.comments(table_name)).empty?
comment_statements = comments.map do |row|
column_name = row[0]
comment = format_comment(row[1])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"