Function MegaMenu has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var MegaMenu = (function () {
function MegaMenu(el, domHandler, renderer) {
this.el = el;
this.domHandler = domHandler;
this.renderer = renderer;Function __decorate has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var __decorate = (this && this.__decorate) || function (decorators, target, key, desc) {
var c = arguments.length, r = c < 3 ? target : desc === null ? desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(target, key) : desc, d;
if (typeof Reflect === "object" && typeof Reflect.decorate === "function") r = Reflect.decorate(decorators, target, key, desc);
else for (var i = decorators.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) if (d = decorators[i]) r = (c < 3 ? d(r) : c > 3 ? d(target, key, r) : d(target, key)) || r;
return c > 3 && r && Object.defineProperty(target, key, r), r;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function MegaMenu has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var MegaMenu = (function () {
function MegaMenu(el, domHandler, renderer) {
this.el = el;
this.domHandler = domHandler;
this.renderer = renderer;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 77 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var __decorate = (this && this.__decorate) || function (decorators, target, key, desc) {
var c = arguments.length, r = c < 3 ? target : desc === null ? desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(target, key) : desc, d;
if (typeof Reflect === "object" && typeof Reflect.decorate === "function") r = Reflect.decorate(decorators, target, key, desc);
else for (var i = decorators.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) if (d = decorators[i]) r = (c < 3 ? d(r) : c > 3 ? d(target, key, r) : d(target, key)) || r;
return c > 3 && r && Object.defineProperty(target, key, r), r;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 237.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
MegaMenu.prototype.itemClick = function (event, item) {
if (item.disabled) {
event.preventDefault();
return;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 111.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
MegaMenu = __decorate([
core_1.Component({
selector: 'p-megaMenu',
template: "\n <div [class]=\"styleClass\" [ngStyle]=\"style\"\n [ngClass]=\"{'ui-menu ui-menubar ui-megamenu ui-widget ui-widget-content ui-corner-all ui-helper-clearfix':true,'ui-megamenu-vertical': orientation == 'vertical'}\">\n <ul class=\"ui-menu-list ui-helper-reset ui-menubar-root-list\">\n <ng-template ngFor let-category [ngForOf]=\"model\">\n <li *ngIf=\"category.separator\" class=\"ui-menu-separator ui-widget-content\">\n <li *ngIf=\"!category.separator\" #item [ngClass]=\"{'ui-menuitem ui-widget ui-corner-all':true,'ui-menu-parent':category.items,'ui-menuitem-active':item==activeItem}\"\n (mouseenter)=\"onItemMouseEnter($event, item, category)\" (mouseleave)=\"onItemMouseLeave($event, item)\">\n <a class=\"ui-menuitem-link ui-corner-all ui-submenu-link\" [ngClass]=\"{'ui-state-disabled':category.disabled}\">\n <span class=\"ui-menuitem-icon fa fa-fw\" [ngClass]=\"category.icon\"></span>\n <span class=\"ui-menuitem-text\">{{category.label}}</span>\n <span class=\"ui-submenu-icon fa fa-fw\" [ngClass]=\"{'fa-caret-down':orientation=='horizontal','fa-caret-right':orientation=='vertical'}\"></span>\n </a>\n <div class=\"ui-megamenu-panel ui-widget-content ui-menu-list ui-corner-all ui-helper-clearfix ui-menu-child ui-shadow\">\n <div class=\"ui-g\">\n <ng-template ngFor let-column [ngForOf]=\"category.items\">\n <div [class]=\"getColumnClass(category)\">\n <ng-template ngFor let-submenu [ngForOf]=\"column\">\n <ul class=\"ui-menu-list ui-helper-reset\">\n <li class=\"ui-widget-header ui-corner-all\"><h3>{{submenu.label}}</h3></li>\n <ng-template ngFor let-item [ngForOf]=\"submenu.items\">\n <li *ngIf=\"item.separator\" class=\"ui-menu-separator ui-widget-content\">\n <li *ngIf=\"!item.separator\" class=\"ui-menuitem ui-widget ui-corner-all\">\n <a *ngIf=\"!item.routerLink\" [href]=\"item.url||'#'\" class=\"ui-menuitem-link ui-corner-all\" [attr.target]=\"item.target\" [attr.title]=\"item.title\"\n [ngClass]=\"{'ui-state-disabled':item.disabled}\" (click)=\"itemClick($event, item)\">\n <span class=\"ui-menuitem-icon fa fa-fw\" *ngIf=\"item.icon\" [ngClass]=\"item.icon\"></span>\n <span class=\"ui-menuitem-text\">{{item.label}}</span>\n </a>\n <a *ngIf=\"item.routerLink\" [routerLink]=\"item.routerLink\" [routerLinkActive]=\"'ui-state-active'\" \n [routerLinkActiveOptions]=\"item.routerLinkActiveOptions||{exact:false}\" class=\"ui-menuitem-link ui-corner-all\" \n [attr.target]=\"item.target\" [attr.title]=\"item.title\"\n [ngClass]=\"{'ui-state-disabled':item.disabled}\" (click)=\"itemClick($event, item)\">\n <span class=\"ui-menuitem-icon fa fa-fw\" *ngIf=\"item.icon\" [ngClass]=\"item.icon\"></span>\n <span class=\"ui-menuitem-text\">{{item.label}}</span>\n </a>\n </li>\n </ng-template>\n </ul>\n </ng-template>\n </div>\n </ng-template>\n </div>\n </div>\n </li>\n </ng-template>\n <li class=\"ui-menuitem ui-menuitem-custom ui-widget ui-corner-all\" *ngIf=\"orientation === 'horizontal'\">\n <ng-content></ng-content>\n </li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n ",
providers: [domhandler_1.DomHandler]- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 71 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var __metadata = (this && this.__metadata) || function (k, v) {
if (typeof Reflect === "object" && typeof Reflect.metadata === "function") return Reflect.metadata(k, v);
};- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
MegaMenuModule = __decorate([
core_1.NgModule({
imports: [common_1.CommonModule, router_1.RouterModule],
exports: [MegaMenu, router_1.RouterModule],
declarations: [MegaMenu]- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.orientation === 'horizontal') {
submenu.style.top = this.domHandler.getOuterHeight(item.children[0]) + 'px';
submenu.style.left = '0px';
}
else if (this.orientation === 'vertical') {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else if (this.orientation === 'vertical') {
submenu.style.top = '0px';
submenu.style.left = this.domHandler.getOuterWidth(item.children[0]) + 'px';
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76