Sign upLogin

KarrLab/test_history_server

View on GitHub
Star
public/static/js/foundation/foundation.js

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 mo
Test Coverage

File foundation.js has 443 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 * Foundation Responsive Library
 * http://foundation.zurb.com
 * Copyright 2014, ZURB
 * Free to use under the MIT license.
Severity: Minor
Found in public/static/js/foundation/foundation.js - About 6 hrs to fix

    Function data_options has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          data_options : function (el, data_attr_name) {
        data_attr_name = data_attr_name || 'options';
        var opts = {}, ii, p, opts_arr,
            data_options = function (el) {
              var namespace = Foundation.global.namespace;
    Severity: Minor
    Found in public/static/js/foundation/foundation.js - About 1 hr to fix

      Function init has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          init : function (scope, libraries, method, options, response) {
      var args = [scope, method, options, response],
          responses = [];

      // check RTL
      Severity: Minor
      Found in public/static/js/foundation/foundation.js - About 1 hr to fix

        Function init has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            init : function (scope, libraries, method, options, response) {
        Severity: Minor
        Found in public/static/js/foundation/foundation.js - About 35 mins to fix

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

          (function ($, window, document, undefined) {
  'use strict';

  var header_helpers = function (class_array) {
    var i = class_array.length;
          Severity: Major
          Found in public/static/js/foundation/foundation.js and 1 other location - About 1 mo to fix
          public/static/js/foundation.min.js on lines 9..703

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 4887.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status