Sign upLogin

LivePersonInc/cacherjs

View on GitHub
Star
src/stores/ttlCacheFileStore.js

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Function prototype has 97 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    TtlCacheFileStore.prototype = (function () {
        /**
         * Method for initialization
         * @param {Object} options - the configuration options for the instance
         * @param {String} options.file - file path
Severity: Major
Found in src/stores/ttlCacheFileStore.js - About 3 hrs to fix

    Function load has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            function load(options) {
            var stream;
            var parser;
            var data;
            var attributes;
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/stores/ttlCacheFileStore.js - About 2 hrs to fix

      Function save has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

              function save(data) {
            var writable;
            var json = {};

            if (this.initialized) {
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/stores/ttlCacheFileStore.js - About 1 hr to fix

        Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
        Open

                                        if (options && options.onitem) {
                                    options.onitem(null, data);
                                }
        Severity: Major
        Found in src/stores/ttlCacheFileStore.js - About 45 mins to fix

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              function TtlCacheFileStore(options) {
        // For forcing new keyword
        if (false === (this instanceof TtlCacheFileStore)) {
            return new TtlCacheFileStore(options);
        }
          Severity: Minor
          Found in src/stores/ttlCacheFileStore.js and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
          src/cacher.js on lines 45..52

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 47.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status