Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 524 of 1,313 total issues

Method operands2rubyvalue has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.operands2rubyvalue(operator, ops, context_type)
    if ops["field"]
      if ops["field"] == "<count>"
        ["<count>", quote(ops["value"], :integer)]
      else
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/miq_expression.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method update_custom_spec has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def update_custom_spec
    vm = get_source_vm
    return if vm.nil?

    if @customize_option.nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_provision_virt_workflow.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method apply has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def apply
    @verified_data.each do |id, data|
      vm = VmOrTemplate.find_by(:id => id)
      if vm
        data.each do |category, entries|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/classification_import.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method determine_visibility has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def determine_visibility(platform, supports_customization_template, customize_fields_list)
    field_names_to_edit = []
    field_names_to_hide = []

    if supports_customization_template
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/services/customize_fields_visibility_service.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_params! has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def validate_params!(env_vars, extra_vars, tags, ansible_runner_method, playbook_or_role_args)
        errors = []

        errors << "env_vars must be a Hash, got: #{hash.class}" unless env_vars.kind_of?(Hash)
        errors << "extra_vars must be a Hash, got: #{hash.class}" unless extra_vars.kind_of?(Hash)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ansible/runner.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method offers has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def offers(perf, ts, options, type, target)
      return nil if options.nil?

      options[:mode] ||= COMPUTE_OFFERS_MODE_DEFAULT[type]
      options[:metric] ||= COMPUTE_OFFERS_METRIC_DEFAULT[type]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vim_performance_analysis.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method process_sub_xml has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.process_sub_xml(xmlNode, path, options = {})
    results = []
    xmlNode.each_element do |e|
      if e.name == 'dir'
        results += process_sub_xml(e, path + '\\' + e.attributes['name'], options)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/filesystem.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method safe_log has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.safe_log(worker, message = nil, exit_code = 0)
    meth = (exit_code == 0) ? :info : :error

    prefix = "#{log_prefix} "      rescue ""
    pid    = "PID [#{Process.pid}] "    rescue ""
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_worker/runner.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method set_ws_field_value_by_display_name has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def set_ws_field_value_by_display_name(values, key, data, dialog_name, dlg_fields, obj_key = :name)
    value = data.delete(key)

    dlg_field = dlg_fields[key]
    data_type = dlg_field[:data_type]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [11/5]
Open

  def clone(name, folder, pool = nil, host = nil, datastore = nil, powerOn = false, template_flag = false, transform = nil, config = nil, customization = nil, disk = nil)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_or_template/operations.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Method has too many optional parameters. [9/3]
Open

  def clone(name, folder, pool = nil, host = nil, datastore = nil, powerOn = false, template_flag = false, transform = nil, config = nil, customization = nil, disk = nil)
    raise _("VM has no EMS, unable to clone") unless ext_management_system

    raw_clone(name, folder, pool, host, datastore, powerOn, template_flag, transform, config, customization, disk)
  end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_or_template/operations.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Method has too many optional parameters. [9/3]
Open

  def raw_clone(_name, _folder, _pool = nil, _host = nil, _datastore = nil, _powerOn = false, _template_flag = false, _transform = nil, _config = nil, _customization = nil, _disk = nil)
    raise NotImplementedError, _("must be implemented in a subclass")
  end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_or_template/operations.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [11/5]
Open

  def raw_clone(_name, _folder, _pool = nil, _host = nil, _datastore = nil, _powerOn = false, _template_flag = false, _transform = nil, _config = nil, _customization = nil, _disk = nil)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_or_template/operations.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [11/5]
Open

  def initialize(
    auto_placement_visibility_service = AutoPlacementVisibilityService.new,
    number_of_vms_visibility_service = NumberOfVmsVisibilityService.new,
    service_template_fields_visibility_service = ServiceTemplateFieldsVisibilityService.new,
    network_visibility_service = NetworkVisibilityService.new,
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/services/dialog_field_visibility_service.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [11/5]
Open

      def run_role_queue(env_vars, extra_vars, role_name, user_id, queue_opts, roles_path:, role_skip_facts: true, hosts: ["localhost"], credentials: [], verbosity: 0, become_enabled: false)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ansible/runner.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Method add_elements has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.add_elements(vm, xmlNode)
    el = xmlNode.root
    return nil unless MiqXml.isXmlElement?(el)
    return nil unless el.name == 'scan_profiles'
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/scan_item.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method fetch_worker_settings_from_options_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.fetch_worker_settings_from_options_hash(options_hash, raw = false)
    return {} unless options_hash.key?(:workers)

    settings = {}
    # Get the configuration values
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_worker.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method set_role_activation has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def set_role_activation(active, *roles)
    roles = roles.first if roles.length == 1 && roles[0].kind_of?(Array)
    return if roles.empty?

    ids = roles == ["*"] ? server_roles.pluck(:id) : ServerRole.where(:name => roles).pluck(:id)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_server/role_management.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method default_rate_details_for has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.default_rate_details_for(rate_type)
    rate_details = []

    fixture_file = File.join(FIXTURE_DIR, "chargeback_rates.yml")
    fixture = File.exist?(fixture_file) ? YAML.load_file(fixture_file) : []
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/chargeback_rate_detail.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_connection_settings has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.validate_connection_settings(host, port, username, password, database = nil, adapter = nil)
    database, adapter = prepare_default_fields(database, adapter)

    log_details = "Host: [#{host}]}, Database: [#{database}], Adapter: [#{adapter}], User: [#{username}]"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_region_remote.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language