Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 524 of 1,313 total issues

Method seed_default_events has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.seed_default_events(event_defs)
    event_sets = MiqEventDefinitionSet.all.index_by(&:name)
    fname = File.join(FIXTURE_DIR, "miq_event_definition_events.yml")
    event_definitions_from_path(fname).each do |event|
      set_type = event.delete('set_type')
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_event_definition.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [10/5]
Open

      def run_role(env_vars, extra_vars, role_name, roles_path:, role_skip_facts: true, tags: nil, hosts: ["localhost"], credentials: [], verbosity: 0, become_enabled: false)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ansible/runner.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [9/5]
Open

  def self.create_job(env_vars, extra_vars, role_or_playbook_options,
                      hosts = ["localhost"], credentials = [],
                      timeout: 1.hour, poll_interval: 1.second, verbosity: 0, become_enabled: false)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_runner_workflow.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [9/5]
Open

      def run_queue(env_vars, extra_vars, playbook_path, user_id, queue_opts, hosts: ["localhost"], credentials: [], verbosity: 0, become_enabled: false)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ansible/runner.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [9/5]
Open

      def run_role_async(env_vars, extra_vars, role_name, roles_path:, role_skip_facts: true, hosts: ["localhost"], credentials: [], verbosity: 0, become_enabled: false)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ansible/runner.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [9/5]
Open

      def run_via_cli(hosts, credentials, env_vars, extra_vars, tags: nil, ansible_runner_method: "run", verbosity: 0, become_enabled: false, **playbook_or_role_args)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ansible/runner.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Method clear_tag has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def clear_tag(category = nil, tag_name = nil)
    if category.nil?
      self.tag_ids = nil
    else
      deletes = []
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/mixins/miq_request_mixin.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method rebuild_master_list has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def rebuild_master_list
    prepare_master_list

    @master_list.each_slice(3) do |section, sub_sections, columns|
      section = section[:name]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_compare.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method perf_capture has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def perf_capture(interval_name, start_time = nil, end_time = nil, target_ids = nil, rollup = false)
    unless Metric::Capture::VALID_CAPTURE_INTERVALS.include?(interval_name)
      raise ArgumentError, _("invalid interval_name '%{name}'") % {:name => interval_name}
    end
    raise ArgumentError, _("end_time cannot be specified if start_time is nil") if start_time.nil? && !end_time.nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/metric/ci_mixin/capture.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method rollup_child_metrics has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.rollup_child_metrics(obj, timestamp, interval_name, assoc)
    timestamp = Time.parse(timestamp).utc if timestamp.kind_of?(String)
    ts = timestamp.utc.iso8601
    recs = obj.vim_performance_state_association(timestamp, assoc).to_a
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/metric/rollup.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method to_export_xml has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def to_export_xml(options = {})
    require 'builder'
    xml = options[:builder] ||= ::Builder::XmlMarkup.new(:indent => options[:indent])
    xml_attrs = {:name => ae_field.name}
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_ae_value.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method seed has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.seed
    db_currencies = ChargebackRateDetailCurrency.all.index_by(&:code)
    if File.exist?(currency_file_source)
      fixture_mtime_currency = File.mtime(currency_file_source).utc
      currencies.each do |currency|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/chargeback_rate_detail_currency.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method quota_find_vms_by_group has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def quota_find_vms_by_group(options)
    vms = []
    prov_owner = get_owner
    unless prov_owner.nil?
      vms = Vm.where("miq_group_id = ?", prov_owner.current_group_id).includes(:hardware => :disks)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/mixins/miq_provision_quota_mixin.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method set_priority has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def set_priority(val)
    # Only allow 1 Primary in the RoleScope
    if val == HIGH_PRIORITY && server_role.master_supported?
      if ['zone', 'region'].include?(server_role.role_scope)
        method = "find_other_servers_in_#{server_role.role_scope}"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/assigned_server_role.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method trap_v1 has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.trap_v1(inputs)
    _log.info(">> inputs=#{inputs.inspect}")

    host = inputs[:host] || inputs['host']
    port = inputs[:port] || inputs['port'] || 162
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_snmp.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_results_for_report_trend has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def build_results_for_report_trend(options)
    # self.db_options = {
    #   :rpt_type       => "trend",
    #   :interval       => "daily",
    #   :start_offset   => 2.days.ago.utc.to_i,
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_report/generator/trend.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method seed_record has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def seed_record(path, report)
      report ||= MiqReport.new

      # DB and filesystem have different precision so calling round is done in
      # order to eliminate the second fractions diff otherwise the comparison
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_report/seeding.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method group_targets_by_ems has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def group_targets_by_ems(targets)
        non_ems_targets = targets.select { |t| !t.kind_of?(ExtManagementSystem) && t.respond_to?(:ext_management_system) }
        MiqPreloader.preload(non_ems_targets, :ext_management_system)

        self.ems_by_ems_id     = {}
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/base_manager/refresher.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method find_or_create_by_fqname has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.find_or_create_by_fqname(fqname, include_classes = true)
    return nil if fqname.blank?

    found = lookup_by_fqname(fqname, include_classes)
    return found unless found.nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_ae_namespace.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method seed_record has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def seed_record(path, scan_item)
      scan_item ||= ScanItem.new

      # DB and filesystem have different precision so calling round is done in
      # order to eliminate the second fractions diff otherwise the comparison
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/scan_item/seeding.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language