Showing 25 of 56 total issues
File optimist.rb
has 824 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'date'
module Optimist
VERSION = "3.1.0"
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 61 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(cmdline = ARGV)
vals = {}
required = {}
opt :version, "Print version and exit" if @version && ! (@specs[:version] || @long["version"])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method each_arg
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def each_arg(args)
remains = []
i = 0
until i >= args.length
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(cmdline = ARGV)
vals = {}
required = {}
opt :version, "Print version and exit" if @version && ! (@specs[:version] || @long["version"])
Class Option
has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Option
attr_accessor :name, :short, :long, :default, :permitted, :permitted_response
attr_writer :multi_given
Class Parser
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Parser
## The registry is a class-instance-variable map of option aliases to their subclassed Option class.
@registry = {}
Method each_arg
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def each_arg(args)
remains = []
i = 0
until i >= args.length
Method educate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def educate(stream = $stdout)
width # hack: calculate it now; otherwise we have to be careful not to
# call this unless the cursor's at the beginning of a line.
left = {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method wrap_line
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def wrap_line(str, opts = {})
prefix = opts[:prefix] || 0
width = opts[:width] || (self.width - 1)
start = 0
ret = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(paramlist, _neg_given)
paramlist.map do |pg|
pg.map do |param|
next param if param.is_a?(Date)
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handle_unknown_argument
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_unknown_argument(arg, candidates, suggestions)
errstring = "unknown argument '#{arg}'"
if (suggestions &&
Module::const_defined?("DidYouMean") &&
Module::const_defined?("DidYouMean::JaroWinkler") &&
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method opt
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def opt(name, desc = "", opts = {}, &b)
opts[:callback] ||= b if block_given?
opts[:desc] ||= desc
o = Option.create(name, desc, opts)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_type_from_disdef
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.get_type_from_disdef(optdef, opttype, disambiguated_default)
if disambiguated_default.is_a? Array
return(optdef.first.class.name.downcase + "s") if !optdef.empty?
if opttype
raise ArgumentError, "multiple argument type must be plural" unless opttype.multi_arg?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handle_unknown_argument
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_unknown_argument(arg, candidates, suggestions)
errstring = "unknown argument '#{arg}'"
if (suggestions &&
Module::const_defined?("DidYouMean") &&
Module::const_defined?("DidYouMean::JaroWinkler") &&
Method add
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add(values)
values = [values] unless values.is_a?(Array) # box the value
values = values.compact
if values.include?(:none)
if values.size == 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(paramlist, _neg_given)
paramlist.map do |pg|
pg.map do |param|
if param =~ /^(stdin|-)$/i
$stdin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if @stop_on_unknown
short_remaining << shortargs[j + 1..-1].join
remains << "-#{short_remaining.join}"
return remains += args[i + 1..-1]
end
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if @stop_on_unknown
remains << "-#{short_remaining.join}"
return remains += args[i + 1..-1]
end
Method resolve_default_short_options!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def resolve_default_short_options!
@order.each do |type, name|
opts = @specs[name]
next if type != :opt || opts.doesnt_need_autogen_short
c = opts.long.long.split(//).find { |d| d !~ Optimist::ShortNames::INVALID_ARG_REGEX && !@short.member?(d) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return remains += args[i + 1..-1]