File vendor.js
has 714 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
THIS FILE IS AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED BY THE `write_vendor_js` RAKE TASK.
DON'T EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND; CHANGES WILL BE OVERRIDEN.
**/
Function anonymous
has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
MiniProfiler.templates["profilerTemplate"] = function anonymous(it
) {
var out=' <div class="profiler-result"> <div class="profiler-button ';if(it.has_duplicate_sql_timings){out+='profiler-warning';}out+='"> ';if(it.has_duplicate_sql_timings){out+='<span class="profiler-nuclear">!</span>';}out+=' <span class="profiler-number profiler-duration-milliseconds"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.duration_milliseconds))+' <span class="profiler-unit">ms</span> </span> ';if(MiniProfiler.showTotalSqlCount()){out+=' <span class="profiler-number profiler-sql-count"> '+( it.sql_count)+' <span class="profiler-unit">sql</span> </span> ';}out+=' <span class="profiler-name"> ';if(it.name.length >= 30){out+=' '+( it.name.substring(0,15) + "..." + it.name.slice(-15) )+' ';}else{out+=' '+( it.name)+' ';}out+=' </span> </div> <div class="profiler-popup"> <div class="profiler-info"> <span class="profiler-name"> '+( it.name)+' <span class="profiler-overall-duration">('+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.duration_milliseconds))+' ms)</span> </span> <span class="profiler-server-time">'+( it.machine_name)+' on '+( MiniProfiler.renderDate(it.started_formatted))+'</span> </div> <div class="profiler-output"> <table class="profiler-timings"> <thead> <tr> <th>event</th> <th>duration (ms)</th> <th class="profiler-duration-with-children">with children (ms)</th> <th class="time-from-start">from start (ms)</th> ';if(it.has_sql_timings){out+=' <th colspan="2">query time (ms)</th> ';}out+=' ';var arr1=it.custom_timing_names;if(arr1){var value,i1=-1,l1=arr1.length-1;while(i1<l1){value=arr1[i1+=1];out+=' <th colspan="2">'+( value.toLowerCase() )+' (ms)</th> ';} } out+=' </tr> </thead> <tbody> '+( MiniProfiler.templates.timingTemplate({timing: it.root, page: it}) )+' </tbody> <tfoot> <tr> <td colspan="3"> ';if(!it.client_timings){out+=' '+( MiniProfiler.templates.linksTemplate({timing: it.root, page: it}) )+' ';}out+=' <a class="profiler-toggle-duration-with-children" title="toggles column with aggregate child durations">show time with children</a> <a class="profiler-snapshots-page-link" title="Go to snapshots page" href="'+( MiniProfiler.options.path )+'snapshots">snapshots</a> </td> ';if(it.has_sql_timings){out+=' <td colspan="2" class="profiler-number profiler-percent-in-sql" title="'+( MiniProfiler.getSqlTimingsCount(it.root) )+' queries spent '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.duration_milliseconds_in_sql) )+' ms of total request time"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.duration_milliseconds_in_sql / it.duration_milliseconds * 100) )+' <span class="profiler-unit">% in sql</span> </td> ';}out+=' ';var arr2=it.custom_timing_names;if(arr2){var value,i2=-1,l2=arr2.length-1;while(i2<l2){value=arr2[i2+=1];out+=' <td colspan="2" class="profiler-number profiler-percentage-in-sql" title="'+( it.custom_timing_stats[value].count )+' '+( value.toLowerCase() )+' invocations spent '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.custom_timing_stats[value].duration) )+' ms of total request time"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.custom_timing_stats[value].duration / it.duration_milliseconds * 100) )+' <span class="profiler-unit">% in '+( value.toLowerCase() )+'</span> </td> ';} } out+=' </tr> </tfoot> </table> ';if(it.client_timings){out+=' <table class="profiler-timings profiler-client-timings"> <thead> <tr> <th>client event</th> <th>duration (ms)</th> <th>from start (ms)</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> ';var arr3=MiniProfiler.getClientTimings(it.client_timings);if(arr3){var value,i3=-1,l3=arr3.length-1;while(i3<l3){value=arr3[i3+=1];out+=' <tr class="';if(value.isTrivial){out+='profiler-trivial';}out+='"> <td class="profiler-label">'+( value.name )+'</td> <td class="profiler-duration"> ';if(value.duration >= 0){out+=' <span class="profiler-unit"></span>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(value.duration) )+' ';}out+=' </td> <td class="profiler-duration time-from-start"> <span class="profiler-unit">+</span>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(value.start) )+' </td> </tr> ';} } out+=' </tbody> <tfoot> <td colspan="3"> '+( MiniProfiler.templates.linksTemplate({timing: it.root, page: it}) )+' </td> </tfoot> </table> ';}out+=' ';if(it.custom_fields && Object.keys(it.custom_fields).length > 0){out+=' <p class="custom-fields-title">Snapshot custom fields</p> <table class="profiler-timings"> <tbody> ';var arr4=Object.keys(it.custom_fields);if(arr4){var key,i4=-1,l4=arr4.length-1;while(i4<l4){key=arr4[i4+=1];out+=' <tr> <td class="profiler-label">'+( key )+'</td> <td class="profiler-label">'+( it.custom_fields[key] )+'</td> </tr> ';} } out+=' </tbody> </table> ';}out+=' </div> </div> ';if(it.has_sql_timings){out+=' <div class="profiler-queries"> <table> <thead> <tr> <th class="ta-right">step<br />time from start<br />query type<br />duration</th> <th class="ta-left">call stack<br />query</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> ';var arr5=MiniProfiler.getSqlTimings(it.root);if(arr5){var value,index=-1,l5=arr5.length-1;while(index<l5){value=arr5[index+=1];out+=' '+( MiniProfiler.templates.sqlGapTemplate({g: value.prevGap}) )+' '+( MiniProfiler.templates.sqlTimingTemplate({i: index, s: value}) )+' ';if(value.nextGap){out+=' '+( MiniProfiler.templates.sqlGapTemplate({g: value.nextGap}) )+' ';}out+=' ';} } out+=' </tbody> </table> <p class="profiler-trivial-gap-container"> <a class="profiler-toggle-trivial-gaps">show trivial gaps</a> </p> </div> ';}out+=' </div>';return out;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function O
has 133 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function O(b) {
function f(c) {
if (c.charAt(0) !== "\\") return c.charCodeAt(0);
switch (c.charAt(1)) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (typeof prettyPrint === "undefined") {
// prettify.js
// http://code.google.com/p/google-code-prettify/
// prettier-ignore
window.PR_SHOULD_USE_CONTINUATION = true;
Function anonymous
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
MiniProfiler.templates["timingTemplate"] = function anonymous(it
) {
var out=' <tr class="';if(it.timing.is_trivial){out+='profiler-trivial';}out+='" data-timing-id="'+( it.timing.id )+'"> <td class="profiler-label" title="';if(it.timing.name && it.timing.name.length > 45){out+=''+( it.timing.name );}out+='"> <span class="profiler-indent">'+( MiniProfiler.renderIndent(it.timing.depth) )+'</span> '+( it.timing.name.slice(0,45) );if(it.timing.name && it.timing.name.length > 45){out+='...';}out+=' </td> <td class="profiler-duration" title="duration of this step without any children\'s durations"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.duration_without_children_milliseconds) )+' </td> <td class="profiler-duration profiler-duration-with-children" title="duration of this step and its children"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.duration_milliseconds) )+' </td> <td class="profiler-duration time-from-start" title="time elapsed since profiling started"> <span class="profiler-unit">+</span>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.start_milliseconds) )+' </td> ';if(it.timing.has_sql_timings){out+=' <td class="profiler-duration ';if(it.timing.has_duplicate_sql_timings){out+='profiler-warning';}out+='" title="';if(it.timing.has_duplicate_sql_timings){out+='duplicate queries detected - ';}if(it.timing.executed_readers > 0 || it.timing.executed_scalars > 0 || it.timing.executed_non_queries > 0){out+=''+( it.timing.executed_readers )+' reader, '+( it.timing.executed_scalars )+' scalar, '+( it.timing.executed_non_queries )+' non-query statements executed';}out+='"> <a class="profiler-queries-show"> ';if(it.timing.has_duplicate_sql_timings){out+='<span class="profiler-nuclear">!</span>';}out+=' '+( it.timing.sql_timings.length )+' <span class="profiler-unit">sql</span> </a> </td> <td class="profiler-duration" title="aggregate duration of all queries in this step (excludes children)"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.sql_timings_duration_milliseconds) )+' </td> ';}else{out+=' <td colspan="2"></td> ';}out+=' ';var arr1=it.page.custom_timing_names;if(arr1){var value,i1=-1,l1=arr1.length-1;while(i1<l1){value=arr1[i1+=1];out+=' ';if(it.timing.custom_timings && it.timing.custom_timings[value]){out+=' <td class="profiler-duration" title="aggregate number of all '+( value.toLowerCase() )+' invocations in this step (excludes children)"> '+( it.timing.custom_timings[value].length )+' '+( value.toLowerCase() )+' </td> <td class="profiler-duration" title="aggregate duration of all '+( value.toLowerCase() )+' invocations in this step (excludes children)"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.custom_timing_stats[value].duration) )+' </td> ';}else{out+=' <td colspan="2"></td> ';}out+=' ';} } out+=' </tr> ';if(it.timing.has_children){out+=' ';var arr2=it.timing.children;if(arr2){var value,i2=-1,l2=arr2.length-1;while(i2<l2){value=arr2[i2+=1];out+=' '+( MiniProfiler.templates.timingTemplate({timing: value, page: it.page}) )+' ';} } out+=' ';}return out;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function anonymous
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
MiniProfiler.templates["snapshotsList"] = function anonymous(it
) {
var out=' '; var data = it.data; out+=' '; var customFieldsNames = it.allCustomFieldsNames; out+=' ';if(data.list && data.list.length){out+=' <h2>Snapshots for '+( data.group_name )+'</h2> <table class="snapshots-table"> <thead> <tr> <th>ID</th> <th>Duration (ms)</th> <th>SQL Count</th> ';var arr1=customFieldsNames;if(arr1){var name,i1=-1,l1=arr1.length-1;while(i1<l1){name=arr1[i1+=1];out+=' <th>'+( name )+'</th> ';} } out+=' <th>Age</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> ';var arr2=data.list;if(arr2){var row,i2=-1,l2=arr2.length-1;while(i2<l2){row=arr2[i2+=1];out+=' <tr> <td><a href="'+( row.url )+'"> '+( row.id )+' </a></td> <td>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(row.duration) )+'</td> <td>'+( row.sql_count )+'</td> ';var arr3=customFieldsNames;if(arr3){var name,i3=-1,l3=arr3.length-1;while(i3<l3){name=arr3[i3+=1];out+=' <td>'+( row.custom_fields[name] || "" )+'</td> ';} } out+=' <td> ';if(row.timestamp){out+=' '+( MiniProfiler.timestampToRelative(row.timestamp) )+' ';}out+=' </td> </tr> ';} } out+=' </tbody> </table> ';}else{out+=' <h2>No snapshots for '+( data.group_name )+'</h2> ';}return out;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function prettyPrint
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
window.prettyPrint = function (b) {
function f() {
for (var t = window.PR_SHOULD_USE_CONTINUATION ? j.now() + 250 : Infinity; q < o.length && j.now() < t; q++) {
var p = o[q];
Function U
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function U(b) {
var f = b.f,
i = b.e;
b.a = f;
Function $
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $(b) {
function f(D) {
if (D > r) {
if (j && j !== q) {
n.push("</span>");
Function B
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function B(b, f) {
var i = {},
o;
(function () {
Function f
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function f() {
for (var t = window.PR_SHOULD_USE_CONTINUATION ? j.now() + 250 : Infinity; q < o.length && j.now() < t; q++) {
var p = o[q];
if (p.className && p.className.indexOf("prettyprint") >= 0) {
Function o
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function o(c) {
var d = c.substring(1, c.length - 1).match(RegExp("\\\\u[0-9A-Fa-f]{4}|\\\\x[0-9A-Fa-f]{2}|\\\\[0-3][0-7]{0,2}|\\\\[0-7]{1,2}|\\\\[\\s\\S]|-|[^-\\\\]", "g"));
c = [];
for (var a = [], k = d[0] === "^", e = k ? 1 : 0, h = d.length; e < h; ++e) {
Function n
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function n(r) {
for (var j = r.c, q = [j, z], m = 0, t = r.source.match(o) || [], p = {}, c = 0, d = t.length; c < d; ++c) {
var a = t[c],
k = p[a],
e = void 0,
Function H
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function H(b, f, i) {
switch (b.nodeType) {
case 1:
var o = b.tagName.toLowerCase();
f.push("<", o);
Function f
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function f(c) {
if (c.charAt(0) !== "\\") return c.charCodeAt(0);
switch (c.charAt(1)) {
case "b":
Function l
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function l(c) {
for (var d = c.source.match(RegExp("(?:\\[(?:[^\\x5C\\x5D]|\\\\[\\s\\S])*\\]|\\\\u[A-Fa-f0-9]{4}|\\\\x[A-Fa-f0-9]{2}|\\\\[0-9]+|\\\\[^ux0-9]|\\(\\?[:!=]|[\\(\\)\\^]|[^\\x5B\\x5C\\(\\)\\^]+)", "g")), a = d.length, k = [], e = 0, h = 0; e < a; ++e) {
var g = d[e];
if (g === "(") ++h;else if ("\\" === g.charAt(0)) if ((g = +g.substring(1)) && g <= h) k[g] = -1;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((a.tagName === "pre" || a.tagName === "code" || a.tagName === "xmp") && a.className && a.className.indexOf("prettyprint") >= 0) {
d = true;
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (p = m.a) {
c = m.b;
if ("XMP" === c.tagName) {
d = document.createElement("PRE");
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (h = 0; h < l; ++h) {
g = f[h];
if (e = a.match(g[1])) {
k = g[0];
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (K) {
d = a.innerHTML;
if ("XMP" === a.tagName) d = y(d);else {
a = a;
if ("PRE" === a.tagName) a = true;else if (ka.test(d)) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
var out=' '; var data = it.data; out+=' '; var customFieldsNames = it.allCustomFieldsNames; out+=' ';if(data.list && data.list.length){out+=' <h2>Snapshots for '+( data.group_name )+'</h2> <table class="snapshots-table"> <thead> <tr> <th>ID</th> <th>Duration (ms)</th> <th>SQL Count</th> ';var arr1=customFieldsNames;if(arr1){var name,i1=-1,l1=arr1.length-1;while(i1<l1){name=arr1[i1+=1];out+=' <th>'+( name )+'</th> ';} } out+=' <th>Age</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> ';var arr2=data.list;if(arr2){var row,i2=-1,l2=arr2.length-1;while(i2<l2){row=arr2[i2+=1];out+=' <tr> <td><a href="'+( row.url )+'"> '+( row.id )+' </a></td> <td>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(row.duration) )+'</td> <td>'+( row.sql_count )+'</td> ';var arr3=customFieldsNames;if(arr3){var name,i3=-1,l3=arr3.length-1;while(i3<l3){name=arr3[i3+=1];out+=' <td>'+( row.custom_fields[name] || "" )+'</td> ';} } out+=' <td> ';if(row.timestamp){out+=' '+( MiniProfiler.timestampToRelative(row.timestamp) )+' ';}out+=' </td> </tr> ';} } out+=' </tbody> </table> ';}else{out+=' <h2>No snapshots for '+( data.group_name )+'</h2> ';}return out;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if ("\\" === g.charAt(0)) if ((g = +g.substring(1)) && g <= h) d[e] = "\\" + k[h];
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!ba.test(m)) if (ca.test(m)) {
f.push(m.substring(9, m.length - 3));
n += m.length - 12;
} else if (da.test(m)) {
f.push("\n");
Function anonymous
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
MiniProfiler.templates["snapshotsGroupsList"] = function anonymous(it
) {
var out=' ';if(it.list && it.list.length){out+=' <table class="snapshots-table"> <thead> <tr> <th>Requests Group</th> <th>Worst Time (ms)</th> <th>Best Time (ms)</th> <th>No. of Snapshots</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> ';var arr1=it.list;if(arr1){var row,i1=-1,l1=arr1.length-1;while(i1<l1){row=arr1[i1+=1];out+=' <tr> <td class="request-group"><a href="'+( row.url )+'">'+( row.name )+'</a></td> <td>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(row.worst_score) )+'</td> <td>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(row.best_score) )+'</td> <td>'+( row.snapshots_count )+'</td> </tr> ';} } out+=' </tbody> </table> ';}else{out+=' <h2>No snapshots exist</h2> ';}return out;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (null === K) {
d = document.createElement("PRE");
d.appendChild(document.createTextNode('<!DOCTYPE foo PUBLIC "foo bar">\n<foo />'));
K = !/</.test(d.innerHTML);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (k < 0) a = p;else {
for (--k; (k = p.indexOf("&#", k + 1)) >= 0;) {
var e = p.indexOf(";", k);
if (e >= 0) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (var r = [], j = n; --j >= 0;) {
r[j] = l[j];
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (!(s < 65 || g > 122)) {
s < 65 || g > 90 || a.push([Math.max(65, g) | 32, Math.min(s, 90) | 32]);
s < 97 || g > 122 || a.push([Math.max(97, g) & -33, Math.min(s, 122) & -33]);
}
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (typeof prettyPrint === "undefined") {
// prettify.js
// http://code.google.com/p/google-code-prettify/
// prettier-ignore
window.PR_SHOULD_USE_CONTINUATION = true;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 8069.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var out=' <tr class="';if(it.timing.is_trivial){out+='profiler-trivial';}out+='" data-timing-id="'+( it.timing.id )+'"> <td class="profiler-label" title="';if(it.timing.name && it.timing.name.length > 45){out+=''+( it.timing.name );}out+='"> <span class="profiler-indent">'+( MiniProfiler.renderIndent(it.timing.depth) )+'</span> '+( it.timing.name.slice(0,45) );if(it.timing.name && it.timing.name.length > 45){out+='...';}out+=' </td> <td class="profiler-duration" title="duration of this step without any children\'s durations"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.duration_without_children_milliseconds) )+' </td> <td class="profiler-duration profiler-duration-with-children" title="duration of this step and its children"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.duration_milliseconds) )+' </td> <td class="profiler-duration time-from-start" title="time elapsed since profiling started"> <span class="profiler-unit">+</span>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.start_milliseconds) )+' </td> ';if(it.timing.has_sql_timings){out+=' <td class="profiler-duration ';if(it.timing.has_duplicate_sql_timings){out+='profiler-warning';}out+='" title="';if(it.timing.has_duplicate_sql_timings){out+='duplicate queries detected - ';}if(it.timing.executed_readers > 0 || it.timing.executed_scalars > 0 || it.timing.executed_non_queries > 0){out+=''+( it.timing.executed_readers )+' reader, '+( it.timing.executed_scalars )+' scalar, '+( it.timing.executed_non_queries )+' non-query statements executed';}out+='"> <a class="profiler-queries-show"> ';if(it.timing.has_duplicate_sql_timings){out+='<span class="profiler-nuclear">!</span>';}out+=' '+( it.timing.sql_timings.length )+' <span class="profiler-unit">sql</span> </a> </td> <td class="profiler-duration" title="aggregate duration of all queries in this step (excludes children)"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.sql_timings_duration_milliseconds) )+' </td> ';}else{out+=' <td colspan="2"></td> ';}out+=' ';var arr1=it.page.custom_timing_names;if(arr1){var value,i1=-1,l1=arr1.length-1;while(i1<l1){value=arr1[i1+=1];out+=' ';if(it.timing.custom_timings && it.timing.custom_timings[value]){out+=' <td class="profiler-duration" title="aggregate number of all '+( value.toLowerCase() )+' invocations in this step (excludes children)"> '+( it.timing.custom_timings[value].length )+' '+( value.toLowerCase() )+' </td> <td class="profiler-duration" title="aggregate duration of all '+( value.toLowerCase() )+' invocations in this step (excludes children)"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.custom_timing_stats[value].duration) )+' </td> ';}else{out+=' <td colspan="2"></td> ';}out+=' ';} } out+=' </tr> ';if(it.timing.has_children){out+=' ';var arr2=it.timing.children;if(arr2){var value,i2=-1,l2=arr2.length-1;while(i2<l2){value=arr2[i2+=1];out+=' '+( MiniProfiler.templates.timingTemplate({timing: value, page: it.page}) )+' ';} } out+=' ';}return out;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var out=' <a href="'+( MiniProfiler.shareUrl(it.page.id) )+'" class="profiler-share-profiler-results" target="_blank">share</a> <a href="'+( MiniProfiler.moreUrl(it.page.name) )+'" class="profiler-more-actions">more</a> ';if(it.page.has_flamegraph){out+=' <a href="'+( MiniProfiler.flamegraphUrl(it.page.id) )+'" class="profiler-show-flamegraph" target="_blank">flamegraph</a> ';}out+=' ';if(it.custom_link){out+=' <a href="'+( it.custom_link )+'" class="profiler-custom-link" target="_blank">'+( it.custom_link_name )+'</a> ';}out+=' ';if(it.page.has_trivial_timings){out+=' <a class="profiler-toggle-trivial" data-show-on-load="'+( it.page.has_all_trivial_timings )+'" title="toggles any rows with < '+( it.page.trivial_duration_threshold_milliseconds )+' ms"> show trivial </a> ';}return out;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var out=' ';if(it.list && it.list.length){out+=' <table class="snapshots-table"> <thead> <tr> <th>Requests Group</th> <th>Worst Time (ms)</th> <th>Best Time (ms)</th> <th>No. of Snapshots</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> ';var arr1=it.list;if(arr1){var row,i1=-1,l1=arr1.length-1;while(i1<l1){row=arr1[i1+=1];out+=' <tr> <td class="request-group"><a href="'+( row.url )+'">'+( row.name )+'</a></td> <td>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(row.worst_score) )+'</td> <td>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(row.best_score) )+'</td> <td>'+( row.snapshots_count )+'</td> </tr> ';} } out+=' </tbody> </table> ';}else{out+=' <h2>No snapshots exist</h2> ';}return out;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var out=' '; var data = it.data; out+=' '; var customFieldsNames = it.allCustomFieldsNames; out+=' ';if(data.list && data.list.length){out+=' <h2>Snapshots for '+( data.group_name )+'</h2> <table class="snapshots-table"> <thead> <tr> <th>ID</th> <th>Duration (ms)</th> <th>SQL Count</th> ';var arr1=customFieldsNames;if(arr1){var name,i1=-1,l1=arr1.length-1;while(i1<l1){name=arr1[i1+=1];out+=' <th>'+( name )+'</th> ';} } out+=' <th>Age</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> ';var arr2=data.list;if(arr2){var row,i2=-1,l2=arr2.length-1;while(i2<l2){row=arr2[i2+=1];out+=' <tr> <td><a href="'+( row.url )+'"> '+( row.id )+' </a></td> <td>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(row.duration) )+'</td> <td>'+( row.sql_count )+'</td> ';var arr3=customFieldsNames;if(arr3){var name,i3=-1,l3=arr3.length-1;while(i3<l3){name=arr3[i3+=1];out+=' <td>'+( row.custom_fields[name] || "" )+'</td> ';} } out+=' <td> ';if(row.timestamp){out+=' '+( MiniProfiler.timestampToRelative(row.timestamp) )+' ';}out+=' </td> </tr> ';} } out+=' </tbody> </table> ';}else{out+=' <h2>No snapshots for '+( data.group_name )+'</h2> ';}return out;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76