File directives.js
has 468 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* INSPINIA - Responsive Admin Theme
*
* Main directives.js file
* Define directives for used plugin
Function captcha
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function captcha() {
return {
restrict: 'AE',
replace: true,
name: 'captcha',
Function vectorMap
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function vectorMap() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope: {
myMapData: '=',
Function dropZone
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function dropZone() {
return {
restrict: 'C',
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
Function iboxToolsFullScreen
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function iboxToolsFullScreen($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope: true,
templateUrl: 'views/common/ibox_tools_full_screen.html',
Function link
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
var config = {
maxFilesize: 100,
paramName: "uploadfile",
Function icheck
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function icheck($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
require: 'ngModel',
link: function($scope, element, $attrs, ngModel) {
Function link
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
var map = element.vectorMap({
map: 'world_mill_en',
backgroundColor: "transparent",
regionStyle: {
Function link
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
// 生成随机字符串作为验证码
function generateCode() {
var chars = '0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXTZabcdefghiklmnopqrstuvwxyz';
var codeLength = 5;
Function controller
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
controller: function ($scope, $element) {
// Function for collapse ibox
$scope.showhide = function () {
var ibox = $element.closest('div.ibox');
var icon = $element.find('i:first');
Function listener
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var listener = function(event, toState, toParams, fromState, fromParams) {
Function minimalizaSidebar
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function minimalizaSidebar($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
template: '<a class="navbar-minimalize minimalize-styl-2 btn btn-primary " href="" ng-click="minimalize()"><i class="fa fa-bars"></i></a>',
controller: function ($scope, $element) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$scope.showhide = function () {
var ibox = $element.closest('div.ibox');
var icon = $element.find('i:first');
var content = ibox.find('div.ibox-content');
content.slideToggle(200);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 159.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$scope.showhide = function () {
var ibox = $element.closest('div.ibox');
var icon = $element.find('i:first');
var content = ibox.find('div.ibox-content');
content.slideToggle(200);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 159.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function chatSlimScroll($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
link: function(scope, element) {
$timeout(function(){
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function fullScroll($timeout){
return {
restrict: 'A',
link: function(scope, element) {
$timeout(function(){
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76