Function SyntaxHighlighter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 380 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
if (!window.SyntaxHighlighter) var SyntaxHighlighter = function() {
// Shortcut object which will be assigned to the SyntaxHighlighter variable.
// This is a shorthand for local reference in order to avoid long namespace
// references to SyntaxHighlighter.whatever...
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function SyntaxHighlighter
has 1012 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
if (!window.SyntaxHighlighter) var SyntaxHighlighter = function() {
// Shortcut object which will be assigned to the SyntaxHighlighter variable.
// This is a shorthand for local reference in order to avoid long namespace
// references to SyntaxHighlighter.whatever...
File !script.js
has 1320 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* SyntaxHighlighter
* http://alexgorbatchev.com/
*
* SyntaxHighlighter is donationware. If you are using it, please donate.
Function matchRecursive
has a Cognitive Complexity of 74 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
XRegExp.matchRecursive = function (str, left, right, flags, options) {
var options = options || {},
escapeChar = options.escapeChar,
vN = options.valueNames,
flags = flags || "",
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function copyToClipboard
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
copyToClipboard : function(highlighter)
{
var flashDiv, flashSwf,
highlighterId = highlighter.id
;
Function matchRecursive
has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
XRegExp.matchRecursive = function (str, left, right, flags, options) {
var options = options || {},
escapeChar = options.escapeChar,
vN = options.valueNames,
flags = flags || "",
Function highlight
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
highlight: function(code, params)
{
// using variables for shortcuts because JS compressor will shorten local variable names
var conf = sh.config,
vars = sh.vars,
Function highlight
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
highlight : function(globalParams, element)
{
function toArray(source)
{
var result = [];
Function create
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.create = function()
{
var config = sh.config;
// disable functionality if running locally
Function HtmlScript
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sh.HtmlScript = function(scriptBrushName)
{
var brushClass = sh.utils.findBrush(scriptBrushName),
scriptBrush,
xmlBrush = new sh.brushes.Xml(),
Function createDisplayLines
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
createDisplayLines : function(code)
{
var lines = code.split(/\n/g),
firstLine = parseInt(this.getParam('first-line')),
padLength = this.getParam('pad-line-numbers'),
Function createButton
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
createButton : function(label, highlighterId, commandName)
{
var a = document.createElement('a'),
style = a.style,
config = sh.config,
Function measureSpace
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
measureSpace : function()
{
var container = document.createElement('div'),
span,
result = 0,
Function Xml
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
SyntaxHighlighter.brushes.Xml = function()
{
function process(match, regexInfo)
{
var constructor = SyntaxHighlighter.Match,
Function printSource
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
printSource : function(highlighter)
{
this.create = function()
{
return sh.config.strings.print;
Function process
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function process(match, info)
{
var code = match.code,
matches = [],
regexList = scriptBrush.regexList,
Function parseParams
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseParams: function(str)
{
var match,
result = {},
arrayRegex = new XRegExp("^\\[(?<values>(.*?))\\]$"),
Function processSmartTabs
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
processSmartTabs : function(code, tabSize)
{
var lines = code.split('\n'),
tab = '\t',
spaces = ''
Function decorate
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
decorate: function(str, css)
{
if (str == null || str.length == 0 || str == '\n')
return str;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (!window.SyntaxHighlighter) var SyntaxHighlighter = function() {
// Shortcut object which will be assigned to the SyntaxHighlighter variable.
// This is a shorthand for local reference in order to avoid long namespace
// references to SyntaxHighlighter.whatever...
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (vN) {
if (vN[0] && outerStart > lastOuterEnd)
output.push([vN[0], str.slice(lastOuterEnd, outerStart), lastOuterEnd, outerStart]);
if (vN[1]) output.push([vN[1], str.slice(outerStart, innerStart), outerStart, innerStart]);
if (vN[2]) output.push([vN[2], str.slice(innerStart, delimStart), innerStart, delimStart]);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (match[3])
hasNamedCapture = true;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (match[4]) {
index = indexOf(captureNames, match[4]);
// keep backreferences separate from subsequent literal numbers
// preserve backreferences to named groups that are undefined at this point as literal strings
output.push(index > -1 ?
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (name) match[name] = match[i];
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (arguments[i] === undefined) match[i] = undefined;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!global)
break;
Function popup
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
popup: function(url, name, width, height, options)
Function matchRecursive
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
XRegExp.matchRecursive = function (str, left, right, flags, options) {
Function executeCommand
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
executeCommand : function(sender, event, highlighterId, commandName, args)
Function Xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
SyntaxHighlighter.brushes.Xml = function()
{
function process(match, regexInfo)
{
var constructor = SyntaxHighlighter.Match,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return 0;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function params(list)
{
var result = '';
for (var name in list)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function attributes(list)
{
var result = '';
for (var name in list)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76