Showing 52 of 207 total issues
Function createDelete
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
createDelete(id: IriString): string {
const generator = new SparqlGenerator();
const identifierMember = RDFSerializer.getUriMetadata(this.dataType);
const query: SparqlQuery = {
type: 'update',
Function convertSingleValue
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
convertSingleValue(
sourceObject: any,
typeDescriptor: TypeDescriptor,
knownTypes: Map<string, Serializable<any>>,
memberName = 'object',
Function externals
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
externals: function (_, request, callback) {
const knownExternals = {
'@openhps/core': {
module: "./openhps-core.es" + (env.prod ? ".min" : "") + ".js",
commonjs: '@openhps/core',
Function deserializer
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deserializer: (object: any) => {
if (!object) {
return undefined;
}
Function deserializeMap
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deserializeMap(
sourceObject: Quad_Object[],
typeDescriptor: MapTypeDescriptor,
knownTypes: Map<string, Serializable<any>>,
memberName: string,
Function generateComparisonSelector
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected generateComparisonSelector<T>(
selector: string,
subquery: QuerySelector<T>,
predicate: IriString,
dataType: Serializable<any>,
Function deserializeObject
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deserializeObject<T>(
sourceObject: Thing,
typeDescriptor: TypeDescriptor,
knownTypes: Map<string, Serializable<any>>,
_: string,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createDeleteAll
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
createDeleteAll(query: FilterQuery<T>): string {
const generator = new SparqlGenerator();
const sparqlQuery: SparqlQuery = {
type: 'update',
prefixes: {
Function generateArraySelector
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected generateArraySelector<T>(
selector: string,
subquery: QuerySelector<T>,
predicate: IriString,
dataType: Serializable<any>,
Function fetchRemoteData
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function fetchRemoteData(url: string, namespace: string): Promise<Quad[]> {
const response = await axios.get(url, {
headers: {
'Accept': 'text/turtle, application/rdf+xml, text/html',
},
Function deserializePredicates
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function deserializePredicates(predicates: any) {
return Object.keys(predicates)
.map((predicate: any) => {
return {
[predicate]: predicates[predicate].map((item: any) => {
Function add
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add(
predicate: IriString,
object: Quad_Object | Thing | number | string | IriString | object,
languageOrDatatype?: string | IriString,
): RDFBuilder {
Function serializer
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
serializer: (node: Node<any, any>, baseUri: IriString) => {
if (!(node instanceof ProcessingNode)) {
return undefined;
}
Function objectPatterns
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
).map((predicate) => {
const patterns: Pattern[] = [];
const selectorPatterns = this.generateSelector(query, predicate, dataType, member, subject);
if (selectorPatterns.length > 0) {
patterns.push(...selectorPatterns);
Function deserializer
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deserializer: (thing: Thing) => {
let yaw = 0;
let roll = 0;
let pitch = 0;
let unit: AngleUnit;
Function loadClasses
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected static loadClasses(module: NodeModule = require.main): void {
if (module === undefined) {
// Use cache instead
Object.values(require.cache).map((m) => this.loadClasses(m));
return;
Function serializer
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
serializer: (pos: GeographicalPosition) => {
if (pos.altitude) {
return {
predicates: {
[ogc.asWKT]: [
Function regexPatterns
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(predicate) => {
return [
{
type: 'bgp',
triples: [
Function deserializer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deserializer: (thing: Thing) => {
let yaw = 0;
let roll = 0;
let pitch = 0;
let unit: AngleUnit;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function serializer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
serializer: (rdf: RDFMetadata) => {
if (!rdf) {
return undefined;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"