Pi2-FGABreja/FGABrejaWeb

View on GitHub
FGABreja/static/js/date_picker/picker.js

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 mo
Test Coverage

Function PickerConstructor has 394 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function PickerConstructor( ELEMENT, NAME, COMPONENT, OPTIONS ) {

    // If there’s no element, return the picker constructor.
    if ( !ELEMENT ) return PickerConstructor

Severity: Major
Found in FGABreja/static/js/date_picker/picker.js - About 1 day to fix

    File picker.js has 539 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    /*!
     * pickadate.js v3.5.0, 2014/04/13
     * By Amsul, http://amsul.ca
     * Hosted on http://amsul.github.io/pickadate.js
     * Licensed under MIT
    Severity: Major
    Found in FGABreja/static/js/date_picker/picker.js - About 1 day to fix

      Function prepareElementRoot has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          function prepareElementRoot() {
      
              P.$root.
      
                  on({
      Severity: Minor
      Found in FGABreja/static/js/date_picker/picker.js - About 2 hrs to fix

        Function open has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                    open: function( dontGiveFocus ) {
        
                        // If it’s already open, do nothing.
                        if ( STATE.open ) return P
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in FGABreja/static/js/date_picker/picker.js - About 1 hr to fix

          Function start has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      start: function() {
          
                          // If it’s already started, do nothing.
                          if ( STATE && STATE.start ) return P
          
          
          Severity: Minor
          Found in FGABreja/static/js/date_picker/picker.js - About 1 hr to fix

            Function prepareElementHidden has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                function prepareElementHidden() {
            
                    var name
            
                    if ( SETTINGS.hiddenName === true ) {
            Severity: Minor
            Found in FGABreja/static/js/date_picker/picker.js - About 1 hr to fix

              Avoid too many return statements within this function.
              Open

                                  return P.component.get( thing )
              Severity: Major
              Found in FGABreja/static/js/date_picker/picker.js - About 30 mins to fix

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                (function ( factory ) {
                
                    // AMD.
                    if ( typeof define == 'function' && define.amd )
                        define( 'picker', ['jquery'], factory )
                Severity: Major
                Found in FGABreja/static/js/date_picker/picker.js and 1 other location - About 1 mo to fix
                FGABreja/static/js/bin/materialize.js on lines 3615..4728

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 6216.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                There are no issues that match your filters.

                Category
                Status