File cookies.js
has 382 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import { Meteor } from 'meteor/meteor';
let fetch;
let WebApp;
Function serialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const serialize = (key, val, opt = {}) => {
let name;
if (!fieldContentRegExp.test(key)) {
name = escape(key);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function serialize
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const serialize = (key, val, opt = {}) => {
let name;
if (!fieldContentRegExp.test(key)) {
name = escape(key);
Function constructor
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor(opts = {}) {
opts.TTL = helpers.isNumber(opts.TTL) ? opts.TTL : false;
opts.runOnServer = opts.runOnServer !== false ? true : false;
opts.allowQueryStringCookies = opts.allowQueryStringCookies !== true ? false : true;
Function constructor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor(opts = {}) {
opts.TTL = helpers.isNumber(opts.TTL) ? opts.TTL : false;
opts.runOnServer = opts.runOnServer !== false ? true : false;
opts.allowQueryStringCookies = opts.allowQueryStringCookies !== true ? false : true;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function send
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send(cb = NoOp) {
if (Meteor.isServer) {
cb(new Meteor.Error(400, "Can't run `.send()` on server, it's Client only method!"));
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function send
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send(cb = NoOp) {
if (Meteor.isServer) {
cb(new Meteor.Error(400, "Can't run `.send()` on server, it's Client only method!"));
}
Function deserialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const deserialize = (string) => {
if (typeof string !== 'string') {
return string;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (urlRE.test(req._parsedUrl.path)) {
const matchedCordovaOrigin =
!!req.headers.origin && this.allowedCordovaOrigins && this.allowedCordovaOrigins.test(req.headers.origin);
const matchedOrigin = matchedCordovaOrigin || (!!req.headers.origin && this.originRE.test(req.headers.origin));
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (matchedCordovaOrigin && opts.allowQueryStringCookies && req.query.___cookies___) {
cookiesObject = parse(decodeURIComponent(req.query.___cookies___));
} else if (req.headers.cookie) {
cookiesObject = parse(req.headers.cookie);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (cookiesKeys.length) {
for (let i = 0; i < cookiesKeys.length; i++) {
const { cookieString } = serialize(cookiesKeys[i], cookiesObject[cookiesKeys[i]]);
if (!cookiesArray.includes(cookieString)) {
cookiesArray.push(cookieString);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (matchedOrigin) {
res.setHeader('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', 'true');
res.setHeader('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', req.headers.origin);
}
Function remove
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove(key, path = '/', domain = '') {
if (key && this.cookies.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
const { cookieString } = serialize(key, '', {
domain,
path,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function set
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
set(key, value, opts = {}) {
if (key && !helpers.isUndefined(value)) {
if (helpers.isNumber(this.TTL) && opts.expires === undefined) {
opts.expires = new Date(+new Date() + this.TTL);
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return string;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return string;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return JSON.parse(string);
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (opt.path && typeof opt.path === 'string') {
if (!fieldContentRegExp.test(opt.path)) {
throw new Meteor.Error(404, 'option path is invalid');
}
pairs.push(`Path=${opt.path}`);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (opt.domain && typeof opt.domain === 'string') {
if (!fieldContentRegExp.test(opt.domain)) {
throw new Meteor.Error(404, 'option domain is invalid');
}
pairs.push(`Domain=${opt.domain}`);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const rootUrl = Meteor.isServer
? process.env.ROOT_URL
: window.__meteor_runtime_config__.ROOT_URL || window.__meteor_runtime_config__.meteorEnv.ROOT_URL || false;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const mobileRootUrl = Meteor.isServer
? process.env.MOBILE_ROOT_URL
: window.__meteor_runtime_config__.MOBILE_ROOT_URL || window.__meteor_runtime_config__.meteorEnv.MOBILE_ROOT_URL || false;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76