Showing 9 of 13 total issues
Method plot
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def plot(term = nil, multiplot_part: false, **options)
fail ArgumentError, 'Empty plots are not supported!' if @datasets.empty?
inner_opts = if multiplot_part
@options.merge(options).reject { |key, _| [:term, :output].include?(key) }
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method plot
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def plot(term = nil, multiplot_part: false, **options)
plot_options = mix_options(options) do |plot_opts, mp_opts|
plot_opts.merge(multiplot: mp_opts.to_h)
end
terminal = term || (plot_options[:output] ? Terminal.new : own_terminal)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method provide_with_datetime_format
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def provide_with_datetime_format(data, using)
return unless defined?(Daru)
return unless data.is_a?(Daru::DataFrame) || data.is_a?(Daru::Vector)
return unless data.index.first.is_a?(DateTime)
return if using[0..1] != '1:'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method gnuplot_fit
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def gnuplot_fit(function, data, options, initials, term_options)
Method handle_stderr
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_stderr(stream)
@err_array = []
# synchronize access to @err_array
@semaphore = Mutex.new
Thread.new do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_gnuplot_points
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_gnuplot_points
result = ''
each_row_with_index do |row, index|
quoted = (index.is_a?(String) || index.is_a?(Symbol)) && index.length > 0
result += quoted ? "\"#{index}\" " : "#{index} "
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method dataset_from_any
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dataset_from_any(source)
ds = case source
# when initialized with dataframe (it passes here several vectors)
when (defined?(Daru) ? Daru::Vector : nil)
Dataset.new(source)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_gnuplot_points
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_gnuplot_points
result = ''
each_with_index do |value, index|
quoted = (index.is_a?(String) || index.is_a?(Symbol)) && index.length > 0
result += quoted ? "\"#{index}\" " : "#{index} "
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update(data = nil, **options)
if data && @type == :datablock
new_datablock = @data.update(data)
if new_datablock == @data
update_options(options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"