Showing 130 of 196 total issues
Method matches? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def matches?(actual)
@actual = actual
raise needs_expected unless defined? @expected
raise needs_subtractable unless @actual.respond_to? :-
res = (@actual - @expected).abs <= @tolerance- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method adjugate! has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def adjugate!
raise(StorageTypeError, "adjugate only works on dense matrices currently") unless self.dense?
raise(ShapeError, "Cannot calculate adjugate of a non-square matrix") unless self.dim == 2 && self.shape[0] == self.shape[1]
raise(DataTypeError, "Cannot calculate adjugate of an integer matrix in-place") if self.integer_dtype?
d = self.det- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method of has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def of(expected)
@expected = expected
@unit = ''
if expected.is_a?(NMatrix)
@tolerance = if @delta.is_a?(NMatrix)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method positive_definite? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def positive_definite?
raise(ShapeError, "positive definite calculated only for square matrices") unless
self.dim == 2 && self.shape[0] == self.shape[1]
cond = 0
while cond != self.cols- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method invert! has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def invert!
raise(StorageTypeError, "invert only works on dense matrices currently") unless self.dense?
raise(ShapeError, "Cannot invert non-square matrix") unless self.dim == 2 && self.shape[0] == self.shape[1]
raise(DataTypeError, "Cannot invert an integer matrix in-place") if self.integer_dtype?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method exact_inverse! has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def exact_inverse!
raise(ShapeError, "Cannot invert non-square matrix") unless self.dim == 2 && self.shape[0] == self.shape[1]
raise(DataTypeError, "Cannot invert an integer matrix in-place") if self.integer_dtype?
#No internal implementation of getri, so use this other function
n = self.shape[0]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method laswp! has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def laswp!(ary, opts={})
raise(StorageTypeError, "ATLAS functions only work on dense matrices") unless self.dense?
opts = { convention: :intuitive }.merge(opts)
if opts[:convention] == :intuitive- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rank has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rank(shape_idx, rank_idx, meth = :copy)
if shape_idx > (self.dim-1)
raise(RangeError, "#rank call was out of bounds")
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method factorize_lu has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def factorize_lu with_permutation_matrix=nil
raise(NotImplementedError, "only implemented for dense storage") unless self.stype == :dense
raise(NotImplementedError, "matrix is not 2-dimensional") unless self.dimensions == 2
t = self.clone- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method asum has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def asum incx=1, n=nil
if self.shape == [1]
return self[0].abs unless self.complex_dtype?
return self[0].real.abs + self[0].imag.abs
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"