Showing 927 of 12,579 total issues
Method geographic_name_classification
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def geographic_name_classification
return @geographic_name_classification if @geographic_name_classification
case object.class.base_class.name
when 'AssertedDistribution'
@geographic_name_classification ||= object.geographic_area.geographic_name_classification
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method load_interface
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.load_interface(settings)
if settings
invalid = settings.keys - [:sandbox_mode]
raise Error, "#{invalid} are not valid settings for interface" unless invalid.empty?
if settings[:sandbox_mode] == true
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method eliminated_taxa
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def eliminated_taxa
h = {}
row_hash.each do |r_key, r_value|
obj = r_value[:object_at_rank].class.to_s + '|' + r_value[:object_at_rank].id.to_s
if r_value[:status] == 'eliminated' && !remaining.include?(r_value[:object_at_rank].class.to_s + '|' + r_value[:object_at_rank].id.to_s)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method collection_object_scientific_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.collection_object_scientific_name(collection_object)
return nil if collection_object.nil?
if a = collection_object.taxon_determinations.order(:position)&.first
if a.otu.taxon_name
a.otu.taxon_name.cached
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method selected_descriptors_hash_initiate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def selected_descriptors_hash_initiate
# "123:1|3||125:3|5||135:2"
h = {}
return h if selected_descriptors.blank?
a = selected_descriptors.include?('||') ? selected_descriptors.to_s.split('||') : [selected_descriptors]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def data
r = raw_data
d = {} # country => [state => [county]]
items.each do |i|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method hunt_dates
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.hunt_dates(label, filters = REGEXP_DATES.keys)
trials = {}
filters.each_with_index {|kee, dex|
trials[kee] = {}
matches = label.to_enum(:scan, REGEXP_DATES[kee][:reg]).map {Regexp.last_match}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method descriptors_with_keywords
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def descriptors_with_keywords
if observation_matrix_id.to_i == 0 && !otu_filter.blank?
d = observation_depictions_from_otu_filter.pluck(:descriptor_id).uniq
ds = Descriptor.where("descriptors.type = 'Descriptor::Media' AND descriptors.id IN (?)", d).not_weight_zero
elsif keyword_ids
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method unambiguous_at?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def unambiguous_at?(rank)
return protonym_result[rank].first if protonym_result[rank].size == 1
if protonym_result[rank].size == 2
n1 = protonym_result[rank].first
n2 = protonym_result[rank].last
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compare
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.compare(object, opts = {} )
r = {
object: object,
comparing_current: false,
version_a: opts[:version_a].to_i,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method selected_descriptors_hash_initiate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def selected_descriptors_hash_initiate
h = {}
return h if selected_descriptors.blank?
a = selected_descriptors.include?('||') ? selected_descriptors.to_s.split('||') : [selected_descriptors]
a.each do |i|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method name_status
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.name_status(taxonworks_object, colrapi_result)
o = taxonworks_object
r = {
taxonworks_name: collection_object_scientific_name(o),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method total_batch_sessions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.total_batch_sessions(sessions)
return 0 if sessions.nil?
i = 0
sessions.each do |s|
next if !s[:batch]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting. Open
if a = c.ancestor_at_rank(:kingdom)
@taxonomy['kingdom'] = a.name
else
# TODO: re-add when dwc_fields merged
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.
Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting. Open
rescue
errors.add(:identifier, "Badly formed URI #{identifier} detected.")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.
Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting. Open
if serial < 3000
century = '18'
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.
Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting. Open
unless URI.scheme_list.keys.include?(scheme)
errors.add(:identifier, "#{scheme} is not in the URI schemes list.")
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.
Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting. Open
if check_byte == 11
check_byte = 0
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.
Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting. Open
if serial >= 8000
century = '20'
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.
Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting. Open
if serial < 6000
century = '18'
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.