TechLadies/home-web

View on GitHub
app/assets/javascripts/jquery.tablesort.js

Summary

Maintainability
A
2 hrs
Test Coverage

Function sort has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    sort: function(th, direction) {
      var start = new Date(),
        self = this,
        table = this.$table,
        //body = table.find('tbody').length > 0 ? table.find('tbody') : table,
Severity: Major
Found in app/assets/javascripts/jquery.tablesort.js - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method 'sort' has a complexity of 8.
    Open

        sort: function(th, direction) {

    Limit Cyclomatic Complexity (complexity)

    Cyclomatic complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. This rule allows setting a cyclomatic complexity threshold.

    function a(x) {
        if (true) {
            return x; // 1st path
        } else if (false) {
            return x+1; // 2nd path
        } else {
            return 4; // 3rd path
        }
    }

    Rule Details

    This rule is aimed at reducing code complexity by capping the amount of cyclomatic complexity allowed in a program. As such, it will warn when the cyclomatic complexity crosses the configured threshold (default is 20).

    Examples of incorrect code for a maximum of 2:

    /*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
    
    function a(x) {
        if (true) {
            return x;
        } else if (false) {
            return x+1;
        } else {
            return 4; // 3rd path
        }
    }

    Examples of correct code for a maximum of 2:

    /*eslint complexity: ["error", 2]*/
    
    function a(x) {
        if (true) {
            return x;
        } else {
            return 4;
        }
    }

    Options

    Optionally, you may specify a max object property:

    "complexity": ["error", 2]

    is equivalent to

    "complexity": ["error", { "max": 2 }]

    Deprecated: the object property maximum is deprecated. Please use the property max instead.

    When Not To Use It

    If you can't determine an appropriate complexity limit for your code, then it's best to disable this rule.

    Further Reading

    Related Rules

    • [max-depth](max-depth.md)
    • [max-len](max-len.md)
    • [max-nested-callbacks](max-nested-callbacks.md)
    • [max-params](max-params.md)
    • [max-statements](max-statements.md) Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/

    Move the invocation into the parens that contain the function.
    Open

    (function($) {

    Require IIFEs to be Wrapped (wrap-iife)

    You can immediately invoke function expressions, but not function declarations. A common technique to create an immediately-invoked function expression (IIFE) is to wrap a function declaration in parentheses. The opening parentheses causes the contained function to be parsed as an expression, rather than a declaration.

    // function expression could be unwrapped
    var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}();
    
    // function declaration must be wrapped
    function () { /* side effects */ }(); // SyntaxError

    Rule Details

    This rule requires all immediately-invoked function expressions to be wrapped in parentheses.

    Options

    This rule has two options, a string option and an object option.

    String option:

    • "outside" enforces always wrapping the call expression. The default is "outside".
    • "inside" enforces always wrapping the function expression.
    • "any" enforces always wrapping, but allows either style.

    Object option:

    • "functionPrototypeMethods": true additionally enforces wrapping function expressions invoked using .call and .apply. The default is false.

    outside

    Examples of incorrect code for the default "outside" option:

    /*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "outside"]*/
    
    var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped
    var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression

    Examples of correct code for the default "outside" option:

    /*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "outside"]*/
    
    var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression

    inside

    Examples of incorrect code for the "inside" option:

    /*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "inside"]*/
    
    var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped
    var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression

    Examples of correct code for the "inside" option:

    /*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "inside"]*/
    
    var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression

    any

    Examples of incorrect code for the "any" option:

    /*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "any"]*/
    
    var x = function () { return { y: 1 };}(); // unwrapped

    Examples of correct code for the "any" option:

    /*eslint wrap-iife: ["error", "any"]*/
    
    var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };}()); // wrapped call expression
    var x = (function () { return { y: 1 };})(); // wrapped function expression

    functionPrototypeMethods

    Examples of incorrect code for this rule with the "inside", { "functionPrototypeMethods": true } options:

    /* eslint wrap-iife: [2, "inside", { functionPrototypeMethods: true }] */
    
    var x = function(){ foo(); }()
    var x = (function(){ foo(); }())
    var x = function(){ foo(); }.call(bar)
    var x = (function(){ foo(); }.call(bar))

    Examples of correct code for this rule with the "inside", { "functionPrototypeMethods": true } options:

    /* eslint wrap-iife: [2, "inside", { functionPrototypeMethods: true }] */
    
    var x = (function(){ foo(); })()
    var x = (function(){ foo(); }).call(bar)

    Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/

    Expected '===' and instead saw '=='.
    Open

          direction = this.direction == 'asc' ? 1 : -1;

    Require === and !== (eqeqeq)

    It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators === and !== instead of their regular counterparts == and !=.

    The reason for this is that == and != do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm. For instance, the following statements are all considered true:

    • [] == false
    • [] == ![]
    • 3 == "03"

    If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b the actual problem is very difficult to spot.

    Rule Details

    This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.

    Examples of incorrect code for this rule:

    /*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
    
    if (x == 42) { }
    
    if ("" == text) { }
    
    if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }

    The --fix option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.

    Options

    always

    The "always" option (default) enforces the use of === and !== in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null [see below]).

    Examples of incorrect code for the "always" option:

    /*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
    
    a == b
    foo == true
    bananas != 1
    value == undefined
    typeof foo == 'undefined'
    'hello' != 'world'
    0 == 0
    true == true
    foo == null

    Examples of correct code for the "always" option:

    /*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
    
    a === b
    foo === true
    bananas !== 1
    value === undefined
    typeof foo === 'undefined'
    'hello' !== 'world'
    0 === 0
    true === true
    foo === null

    This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:

    • "null": Customize how this rule treats null literals. Possible values:
      • always (default) - Always use === or !==.
      • never - Never use === or !== with null.
      • ignore - Do not apply this rule to null.

    smart

    The "smart" option enforces the use of === and !== except for these cases:

    • Comparing two literal values
    • Evaluating the value of typeof
    • Comparing against null

    Examples of incorrect code for the "smart" option:

    /*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
    
    // comparing two variables requires ===
    a == b
    
    // only one side is a literal
    foo == true
    bananas != 1
    
    // comparing to undefined requires ===
    value == undefined

    Examples of correct code for the "smart" option:

    /*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
    
    typeof foo == 'undefined'
    'hello' != 'world'
    0 == 0
    true == true
    foo == null

    allow-null

    Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null literal.

    ["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]

    When Not To Use It

    If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/

    Expected '!==' and instead saw '!='.
    Open

            return ($(this).data().sortValue != null ? $(this).data().sortValue : $(this).text());

    Require === and !== (eqeqeq)

    It is considered good practice to use the type-safe equality operators === and !== instead of their regular counterparts == and !=.

    The reason for this is that == and != do type coercion which follows the rather obscure Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm. For instance, the following statements are all considered true:

    • [] == false
    • [] == ![]
    • 3 == "03"

    If one of those occurs in an innocent-looking statement such as a == b the actual problem is very difficult to spot.

    Rule Details

    This rule is aimed at eliminating the type-unsafe equality operators.

    Examples of incorrect code for this rule:

    /*eslint eqeqeq: "error"*/
    
    if (x == 42) { }
    
    if ("" == text) { }
    
    if (obj.getStuff() != undefined) { }

    The --fix option on the command line automatically fixes some problems reported by this rule. A problem is only fixed if one of the operands is a typeof expression, or if both operands are literals with the same type.

    Options

    always

    The "always" option (default) enforces the use of === and !== in every situation (except when you opt-in to more specific handling of null [see below]).

    Examples of incorrect code for the "always" option:

    /*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
    
    a == b
    foo == true
    bananas != 1
    value == undefined
    typeof foo == 'undefined'
    'hello' != 'world'
    0 == 0
    true == true
    foo == null

    Examples of correct code for the "always" option:

    /*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "always"]*/
    
    a === b
    foo === true
    bananas !== 1
    value === undefined
    typeof foo === 'undefined'
    'hello' !== 'world'
    0 === 0
    true === true
    foo === null

    This rule optionally takes a second argument, which should be an object with the following supported properties:

    • "null": Customize how this rule treats null literals. Possible values:
      • always (default) - Always use === or !==.
      • never - Never use === or !== with null.
      • ignore - Do not apply this rule to null.

    smart

    The "smart" option enforces the use of === and !== except for these cases:

    • Comparing two literal values
    • Evaluating the value of typeof
    • Comparing against null

    Examples of incorrect code for the "smart" option:

    /*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
    
    // comparing two variables requires ===
    a == b
    
    // only one side is a literal
    foo == true
    bananas != 1
    
    // comparing to undefined requires ===
    value == undefined

    Examples of correct code for the "smart" option:

    /*eslint eqeqeq: ["error", "smart"]*/
    
    typeof foo == 'undefined'
    'hello' != 'world'
    0 == 0
    true == true
    foo == null

    allow-null

    Deprecated: Instead of using this option use "always" and pass a "null" option property with value "ignore". This will tell eslint to always enforce strict equality except when comparing with the null literal.

    ["error", "always", {"null": "ignore"}]

    When Not To Use It

    If you don't want to enforce a style for using equality operators, then it's safe to disable this rule. Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/

    Use ‘===’ to compare with ‘null’.
    Open

            return ($(this).data().sortValue != null ? $(this).data().sortValue : $(this).text());

    Disallow Null Comparisons (no-eq-null)

    Comparing to null without a type-checking operator (== or !=), can have unintended results as the comparison will evaluate to true when comparing to not just a null, but also an undefined value.

    if (foo == null) {
      bar();
    }

    Rule Details

    The no-eq-null rule aims reduce potential bug and unwanted behavior by ensuring that comparisons to null only match null, and not also undefined. As such it will flag comparisons to null when using == and !=.

    Examples of incorrect code for this rule:

    /*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
    
    if (foo == null) {
      bar();
    }
    
    while (qux != null) {
      baz();
    }

    Examples of correct code for this rule:

    /*eslint no-eq-null: "error"*/
    
    if (foo === null) {
      bar();
    }
    
    while (qux !== null) {
      baz();
    }

    Source: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status