Sign upLogin

ValeriaVG/nomocms

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 5 of 7 total issues

Function makeRoutesMiddleware has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  <C extends Ctx>(routes: Record<string, Route<C>>): Middleware =>
    async (ctx, res, next) => {
      const routePath = createRouter<{ req: IncomingMessage }>(routes);
      const req = ctx.req;
      const url = new URL(req.url, "http://127.0.0.1");
Severity: Minor
Found in api/http/handler.ts - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function sendResponse has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

const sendResponse = (
  res: ServerResponse,
  body: Record<string, any> | Array<any> | string | Buffer | Readable
) => {
  if (!body) return res.end();
Severity: Minor
Found in api/http/handler.ts - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function tuple has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  <A extends Typed, B extends Typed[]>(
    ...types: [A, ...B]
  ): Typed<[Infer<A>, ...InferTuple<B>]> =>
    (x) => {
      if (!Array.isArray(x)) {
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/typed/typed.ts - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function array has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  <T>(type: Typed<T>): Typed<T[]> =>
    (x) => {
      if (!Array.isArray(x)) {
        return failure(toError(toMessage("array", getTypeOf(x))));
      }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/typed/typed.ts - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function intersection has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  <A extends Typed<PlainObject>, B extends Typed<PlainObject>[]>(
    ...types: [A, ...B]
  ): Typed<Infer<A> & UnionToIntersection<InferTuple<B>[number]>> =>
    (x): Result<Infer<A> & UnionToIntersection<InferTuple<B>[number]>> => {
      const errors: Err[] = [];
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/typed/typed.ts - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language