Function init
has 171 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function init(domainManager) {
if (!domainManager.hasDomain("extensionManager")) {
domainManager.registerDomain("extensionManager", {major: 0, minor: 1});
}
domainManager.registerCommand(
File ExtensionManagerDomain.js
has 418 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* Copyright (c) 2013 - present Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights reserved.
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
Function _cmdInstall
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _cmdInstall(packagePath, destinationDirectory, options, callback, pCallback, _doUpdate) {
if (!options || !options.disabledDirectory || !options.apiVersion || !options.systemExtensionDirectory) {
callback(new Error(Errors.MISSING_REQUIRED_OPTIONS), null);
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _cmdInstall
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _cmdInstall(packagePath, destinationDirectory, options, callback, pCallback, _doUpdate) {
if (!options || !options.disabledDirectory || !options.apiVersion || !options.systemExtensionDirectory) {
callback(new Error(Errors.MISSING_REQUIRED_OPTIONS), null);
return;
}
Function validateCallback
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function validateCallback(err, validationResult) {
validationResult.localPath = packagePath;
// This is a wrapper for the callback that will delete the temporary
// directory to which the package was unzipped.
Function _cmdDownloadFile
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _cmdDownloadFile(downloadId, url, proxy, callback, pCallback) {
// Backwards compatibility check, added in 0.37
if (typeof proxy === "function") {
callback = proxy;
proxy = undefined;
Function _cmdInstall
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _cmdInstall(packagePath, destinationDirectory, options, callback, pCallback, _doUpdate) {
Function _cmdDownloadFile
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _cmdDownloadFile(downloadId, url, proxy, callback, pCallback) {
Function _cmdUpdate
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _cmdUpdate(packagePath, destinationDirectory, options, callback, pCallback) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
domainManager.registerCommand(
"extensionManager",
"update",
_cmdUpdate,
true,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 172.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
domainManager.registerCommand(
"extensionManager",
"install",
_cmdInstall,
true,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 172.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var Statuses = {
FAILED: "FAILED",
INSTALLED: "INSTALLED",
ALREADY_INSTALLED: "ALREADY_INSTALLED",
SAME_VERSION: "SAME_VERSION",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76