Showing 67 of 109 total issues
Function embedSWF
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
10),e[1]=parseInt(c.replace(/^.*\.(.*)\s.*$/,"$1"),10),e[2]=/[a-zA-Z]/.test(c)?parseInt(c.replace(/^.*[a-zA-Z]+(.*)$/,"$1"),10):0}else if(typeof v.ActiveXObject!=l)try{var f=new ActiveXObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash");if(f&&(c=f.GetVariable("$version")))k=!0,c=c.split(" ")[1].split(","),e=[parseInt(c[0],10),parseInt(c[1],10),parseInt(c[2],10)]}catch(h){}return{w3:a,pv:e,wk:b,ie:k,win:g,mac:d}}();return{embedSWF:function(a,b,d,i,k,e,c,f,h){var j={success:!1,id:b};if(g.w3&&!(g.wk&&g.wk<312)&&
Function testPlayerVersion
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function testPlayerVersion() {
var b = doc.getElementsByTagName("body")[0];
var o = createElement(OBJECT);
o.setAttribute("type", FLASH_MIME_TYPE);
var t = b.appendChild(o);
Function testPlayerVersion
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function testPlayerVersion() {
var b = doc.getElementsByTagName("body")[0];
var o = createElement(OBJECT);
o.setAttribute("type", FLASH_MIME_TYPE);
var t = b.appendChild(o);
Method fill_url
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fill_url(site, page_or_post)
url = REXML::Element.new "url"
loc = fill_location(page_or_post)
url.add_element(loc)
Method render
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render(context)
quote = paragraphize(super)
author = "<strong>#{@by.strip}</strong>" if @by
if @source
url = @source.match(/https?:\/\/(.+)/)[1].split('/')
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
var swfobject=function(){function s(a,b,d){var q,k=n(d);if(g.wk&&g.wk<312)return q;if(k){if(typeof a.id==l)a.id=d;if(g.ie&&g.win){var e="",c;for(c in a)if(a[c]!=Object.prototype[c])c.toLowerCase()=="data"?b.movie=a[c]:c.toLowerCase()=="styleclass"?e+=' class="'+a[c]+'"':c.toLowerCase()!="classid"&&(e+=" "+c+'="'+a[c]+'"');c="";for(var f in b)b[f]!=Object.prototype[f]&&(c+='<param name="'+f+'" value="'+b[f]+'" />');k.outerHTML='<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"'+e+">"+c+
"</object>";q=n(a.id)}else{f=i.createElement(o);f.setAttribute("type",m);for(var h in a)a[h]!=Object.prototype[h]&&(h.toLowerCase()=="styleclass"?f.setAttribute("class",a[h]):h.toLowerCase()!="classid"&&f.setAttribute(h,a[h]));for(e in b)b[e]!=Object.prototype[e]&&e.toLowerCase()!="movie"&&(a=f,c=e,h=b[e],d=i.createElement("param"),d.setAttribute("name",c),d.setAttribute("value",h),a.appendChild(d));k.parentNode.replaceChild(f,k);q=f}}return q}function n(a){var b=null;try{b=i.getElementById(a)}catch(d){}return b}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
var swfobject=function(){function s(a,b,d){var q,k=n(d);if(g.wk&&g.wk<312)return q;if(k){if(typeof a.id==l)a.id=d;if(g.ie&&g.win){var e="",c;for(c in a)if(a[c]!=Object.prototype[c])c.toLowerCase()=="data"?b.movie=a[c]:c.toLowerCase()=="styleclass"?e+=' class="'+a[c]+'"':c.toLowerCase()!="classid"&&(e+=" "+c+'="'+a[c]+'"');c="";for(var f in b)b[f]!=Object.prototype[f]&&(c+='<param name="'+f+'" value="'+b[f]+'" />');k.outerHTML='<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"'+e+">"+c+
"</object>";q=n(a.id)}else{f=i.createElement(o);f.setAttribute("type",m);for(var h in a)a[h]!=Object.prototype[h]&&(h.toLowerCase()=="styleclass"?f.setAttribute("class",a[h]):h.toLowerCase()!="classid"&&f.setAttribute(h,a[h]));for(e in b)b[e]!=Object.prototype[e]&&e.toLowerCase()!="movie"&&(a=f,c=e,h=b[e],d=i.createElement("param"),d.setAttribute("name",c),d.setAttribute("value",h),a.appendChild(d));k.parentNode.replaceChild(f,k);q=f}}return q}function n(a){var b=null;try{b=i.getElementById(a)}catch(d){}return b}
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(tag_name, markup, tokens)
attributes = ['class', 'src', 'width', 'height', 'title']
if markup =~ /(?<class>\S.*\s+)?(?<src>(?:https?:\/\/|\/|\S+\/)\S+)(?:\s+(?<width>\d+))?(?:\s+(?<height>\d+))?(?<title>\s+.+)?/i
@img = attributes.reduce({}) { |img, attr| img[attr] = $~[attr].strip if $~[attr]; img }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method render
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render(context)
includes_dir = File.join(context.registers[:site].source, '_includes')
if File.symlink?(includes_dir)
return "Includes directory '#{includes_dir}' cannot be a symlink"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method render
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render(context)
code_dir = (context.registers[:site].config['code_dir'].sub(/^\//,'') || 'downloads/code')
code_path = (Pathname.new(context.registers[:site].source) + code_dir).expand_path
file = code_path + @file
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fill_url
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fill_url(site, page_or_post)
url = REXML::Element.new "url"
loc = fill_location(page_or_post)
url.add_element(loc)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(tokens)
@nodelist ||= []
@nodelist.clear
while token = tokens.shift
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(tag_name, markup, tokens)
if /(?<fiddle>\w+\/?\d?)(?:\s+(?<sequence>[\w,]+))?(?:\s+(?<skin>\w+))?(?:\s+(?<height>\w+))?(?:\s+(?<width>\w+))?/ =~ markup
@fiddle = fiddle
@sequence = (sequence unless sequence == 'default') || 'js,resources,html,css,result'
@skin = (skin unless skin == 'default') || 'light'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(config, page, all_posts, index_dir, pagination_dir, num_pages = nil)
@page = page
@per_page = config['paginate'].to_i
@page_dir = pagination_dir + 'page/'
@total_pages = num_pages || Pager.calculate_pages(all_posts, @per_page)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (m.toLowerCase() == "styleclass") { // 'class' is an ECMA4 reserved keyword
o.setAttribute("class", attObj[m]);
}
else if (m.toLowerCase() != "classid") { // filter out IE specific attribute
o.setAttribute(m, attObj[m]);
Method pygments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pygments(code, lang)
if defined?(PYGMENTS_CACHE_DIR)
path = File.join(PYGMENTS_CACHE_DIR, "#{lang}-#{Digest::MD5.hexdigest(code)}.html")
if File.exist?(path)
highlighted_code = File.read(path)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method render
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render(context)
file_dir = (context.registers[:site].source || 'source')
file_path = Pathname.new(file_dir).expand_path
file = file_path + @file
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (m.toLowerCase() == "styleclass") { // 'class' is an ECMA4 reserved keyword
o.setAttribute("class", attObj[m]);
}
else if (m.toLowerCase() != "classid") { // filter out IE specific attribute
o.setAttribute(m, attObj[m]);
Method get_gist_from_web
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_gist_from_web(gist, file)
gist_url = get_gist_url_for(gist, file)
data = get_web_content(gist_url)
locations = Array.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (i.toLowerCase() == "data") {
parObj.movie = attObj[i];
}
else if (i.toLowerCase() == "styleclass") { // 'class' is an ECMA4 reserved keyword
att += ' class="' + attObj[i] + '"';