Showing 17 of 65 total issues
Method Type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.Type type, **params
case Snake(type)
when 'string'
if Falsey?(params[:strip])
:str?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method SnakeSafe
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.SnakeSafe(whatever, existing = [], update_existing: true, short: false, symbolize: false)
result = Snake(whatever, short: short)
str = loop do
break result unless existing.include? result
suffix = result[/(?<=_)\d+(?=\z)/]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method patch_message_set
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.patch_message_set(set)
return nil if set.empty?
fail TypeError, "Expected: ::Dry::Validation::MessageSet; got: #{set.class}" unless set.is_a?(::Dry::Validation::MessageSet)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method prepended
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.prepended base
fail ArgumentError, "Can not prepend #{self.class} to #{base.class}: base class must be a ::Mutations::Command descendant." unless base < ::Mutations::Command
base.extend(DSL::Module) unless base.ancestors.include?(DSL::Module)
base.extend(Module.new do
def exceptions_as_errors(value)
Method Type
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.Type type, **params
case Snake(type)
when 'string'
if Falsey?(params[:strip])
:str?
Method Either
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.Either input
case input
when Class then input.prepend Either unless input.ancestors.include?(Either)
when Module then input.include Either unless input.ancestors.include?(Either)
else input.singleton_class.prepend Either unless input.singleton_class.ancestors.include?(Either)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fix_accessors!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fix_accessors!
schema.rules.keys.each do |method|
next if respond_to?(name = method)
singleton_class.tap do |c|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method derived_schema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def derived_schema input_processor:, type:, **options, &block
this = is_a?(Class) ? self : self.class
parent_with_schema = this.ancestors.drop(1).detect do |klazz|
next if [this, ::Mutations::Command, ::Dry::Mutations::Extensions::Command].include?(klazz)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method array
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def array name, **params, &cb
current = @current # closure scope
nested = begin
Nested.!(current, &cb)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Schema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.Schema(input_processor: nil, type: :schema, **options, &block)
type = :schema unless type && ::Dry::Mutations.const_defined?(type.to_s.capitalize)
parent = ::Dry::Mutations.const_get(type.to_s.capitalize)
::Dry::Validation.Schema(parent, **options) do
configure { config.input_processor = input_processor } if input_processor
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method prepended
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.prepended base
fail ArgumentError, "Can not prepend #{self.class} to #{base.class}: base class must be a ::Mutations::Command descendant." unless base < ::Mutations::Command
base.extend(DSL::Module) unless base.ancestors.include?(DSL::Module)
base.extend(Module.new do
def exceptions_as_errors(value)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method schema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def schema *args, input_processor: nil, type: :form, **options, &block
case args.count
when 0, 1
schema, = args
@schema ||= patched_schema(schema) \
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method RawInputs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.RawInputs *args
args.inject(Utils.Hash({})) do |h, arg|
h.merge! case arg
when Hash then arg
when ::Dry::Monads::Either::Right then arg.value
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method finalizer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def finalizer(type, outcome)
fin = self.class.instance_variable_get :@finalizers
# rubocop:disable Lint/AssignmentInCondition
return nil unless fin.is_a?(Hash) && finalizer = fin[type]
# rubocop:enable Lint/AssignmentInCondition
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Outcome
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.Outcome input
case input
when ::Mutations::Outcome then input
when ::Dry::Monads::Either::Left
::Mutations::Outcome.new(false, nil, input.value, nil).tap do |outcome|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method dig
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dig(predicate, input = schema)
case input.rules
when Hash # the whole schema
input.rules.map do |k, v|
pred = predicates(v).detect do |p|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extended
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.extended base
fail Errors::TypeError.new("Extended class [#{base}] should not respond to :call, it is defined by this extension.") if base.respond_to?(:call)
base.send :define_method, :initialize do |*input|
@input = Utils.RawInputs(*input)
end unless base.instance_methods(false).include?(:initialize)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"