Showing 9 of 42 total issues
Method hook
has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def hook
status = {}
λ = (hash = to_hash).delete(:lambdas)
p = Module.new do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method hook
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def hook
status = {}
λ = (hash = to_hash).delete(:lambdas)
p = Module.new do
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize *args, **params
@λ = { before: nil, after: nil, on_hook: nil, on_error: nil }
@klazz, @method, @receiver = case args.size
when 1
case args.first
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method bottleneck
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def bottleneck(method: nil, receiver: nil, result: nil, **params)
return unless (receiver_class = receiver.class.ancestors.detect do |c|
@hash[c.name] && @hash[c.name][method]
end)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method attach
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def attach(to, before: nil, after: nil, exclude: nil)
fail ArgumentError, "Trying to attach nothing to #{klazz}##{to}. I need a block!" unless block_given?
cb = Proc.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method load_stuff
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_stuff hos
case hos
when NilClass then Hashie::Mash.new # aka skip
when Hash then Hashie::Mash.new(hos)
when String
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method bulk
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def bulk(hos)
Kungfuig.load_stuff(hos).map do |klazz, hash|
next if hash.empty?
[klazz, H.new.remap_hash_for_easy_iteration(hash).map do |handler, methods|
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method aspect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def aspect meth, after = true
fail ArgumentError.new "Aspect must have a codeblock" unless block_given?
fail NoMethodError.new "Aspect must be attached to existing method" unless instance_methods.include? meth.to_sym
Kungfuig::Prepender.new(self, meth).public_send((after ? :after : :before), &Proc.new).hook!
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method option
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def option *keys
key = keys.map(&:to_s).join('.').gsub(/::/, '.').split('.')
MX.synchronize {
# options.foo!.bar!.baz!
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"