Sign upLogin

aviator/aviator

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 49 of 74 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          service_specs = session_data[:body][:token][:catalog].select{|s| s[:type].match("#{ service }(v\d+)?") }
          raise MultipleServiceApisError.new(service, service_specs, request_name) unless service_specs.length <= 1
          raise Aviator::Service::MissingServiceEndpointError.new(service.to_s, request_name) unless service_specs.length > 0
          version = service_specs[0][:endpoints][0][:url].match(/(v\d+)\.?\d*/)
          version ? version[1].to_sym : :v1
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/provider.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/provider.rb on lines 167..173

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 63.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          service_specs = session_data[:body][:access][:serviceCatalog].select{|s| s[:type].match("#{ service }(v\d+)?") }
          raise MultipleServiceApisError.new(service, service_specs, request_name) unless service_specs.length <= 1
          raise Aviator::Service::MissingServiceEndpointError.new(service.to_s, request_name) unless service_specs.length > 0
          version = service_specs[0][:endpoints][0][:publicURL].match(/(v\d+)\.?\d*/)
          version ? version[1].to_sym : :v1
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/provider.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/provider.rb on lines 174..179

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 63.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def url
      str  = "#{ base_url }/volumes"
      str += "/detail" if params[:details]

      filters = []
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/volume/requests/v1/public/list_volumes.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/list_servers.rb on lines 40..53

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def url
      str  = "#{ base_url }/servers"
      str += "/detail" if params[:details]

      filters = []
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/list_servers.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/volume/requests/v1/public/list_volumes.rb on lines 30..43

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :add_role_to_user_on_tenant, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :admin, :base] do

    meta :service, :identity

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/identity/requests/v2/admin/add_role_to_user_on_tenant.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/identity/requests/v2/admin/delete_role_from_user_on_tenant.rb on lines 3..29

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 61.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :delete_role_from_user_on_tenant, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :admin, :base] do

    meta :service, :identity
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/identity/requests/v2/admin/delete_role_from_user_on_tenant.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/identity/requests/v2/admin/add_role_to_user_on_tenant.rb on lines 3..28

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 61.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :set_image_metadata, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/set_image_metadata.rb and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/set_server_metadata.rb on lines 3..33
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/update_image_metadata.rb on lines 3..33
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/update_server_metadata.rb on lines 3..33

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 52.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :set_server_metadata, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/set_server_metadata.rb and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/set_image_metadata.rb on lines 3..33
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/update_image_metadata.rb on lines 3..33
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/update_server_metadata.rb on lines 3..33

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 52.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :update_server_metadata, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/update_server_metadata.rb and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/set_image_metadata.rb on lines 3..33
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/set_server_metadata.rb on lines 3..33
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/update_image_metadata.rb on lines 3..33

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 52.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :update_image_metadata, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/update_image_metadata.rb and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/set_image_metadata.rb on lines 3..33
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/set_server_metadata.rb on lines 3..33
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/update_server_metadata.rb on lines 3..33

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 52.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :get_image_metadata_item, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/get_image_metadata_item.rb and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/delete_image_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/delete_server_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/get_server_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :delete_server_metadata_item, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/delete_server_metadata_item.rb and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/delete_image_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/get_image_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/get_server_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :delete_image_metadata_item, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/delete_image_metadata_item.rb and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/delete_server_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/get_image_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/get_server_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :get_server_metadata_item, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/get_server_metadata_item.rb and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/delete_image_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/delete_server_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/get_image_metadata_item.rb on lines 3..26

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :start_server, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/start_server.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/stop_server.rb on lines 3..25

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :unlock_server, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :admin, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/unlock_server.rb and 7 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/confirm_server_resize.rb on lines 3..31
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/lock_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/migrate_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/pause_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/resume_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/suspend_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/unpause_server.rb on lines 3..29

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :lock_server, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :admin, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/lock_server.rb and 7 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/confirm_server_resize.rb on lines 3..31
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/migrate_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/unlock_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/pause_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/resume_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/suspend_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/unpause_server.rb on lines 3..29

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :pause_server, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/pause_server.rb and 7 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/confirm_server_resize.rb on lines 3..31
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/lock_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/migrate_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/unlock_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/resume_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/suspend_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/unpause_server.rb on lines 3..29

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :stop_server, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/stop_server.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/start_server.rb on lines 3..25

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  define_request :suspend_server, :inherit => [:openstack, :common, :v2, :public, :base] do

    meta :service, :compute

    link 'documentation',
Severity: Major
Found in lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/suspend_server.rb and 7 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/confirm_server_resize.rb on lines 3..31
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/lock_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/migrate_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/admin/unlock_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/pause_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/resume_server.rb on lines 3..29
lib/aviator/openstack/compute/requests/v2/public/unpause_server.rb on lines 3..29

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language