File expression.js
has 1967 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// @flow
// A recursive descent parser operates by defining functions for all
// syntactic elements, and recursively calling those, each function
// advancing the input stream and returning an AST node. Precedence
ExpressionParser
has 76 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default class ExpressionParser extends LValParser {
// Forward-declaration: defined in statement.js
/*::
+parseBlock: (
allowDirectives?: boolean,
Function parseExprAtom
has 239 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseExprAtom(refExpressionErrors?: ?ExpressionErrors): N.Expression {
// If a division operator appears in an expression position, the
// tokenizer got confused, and we force it to read a regexp instead.
if (this.state.type === tt.slash) this.readRegexp();
Function parseExprAtom
has a Cognitive Complexity of 44 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseExprAtom(refExpressionErrors?: ?ExpressionErrors): N.Expression {
// If a division operator appears in an expression position, the
// tokenizer got confused, and we force it to read a regexp instead.
if (this.state.type === tt.slash) this.readRegexp();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseExprOp
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseExprOp(
left: N.Expression,
leftStartPos: number,
leftStartLoc: Position,
minPrec: number,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseSubscript
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseSubscript(
base: N.Expression,
startPos: number,
startLoc: Position,
noCalls: ?boolean,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseSubscript
has 106 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseSubscript(
base: N.Expression,
startPos: number,
startLoc: Position,
noCalls: ?boolean,
Function parseParenAndDistinguishExpression
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseParenAndDistinguishExpression(canBeArrow: boolean): N.Expression {
const startPos = this.state.start;
const startLoc = this.state.startLoc;
let val;
Function parseParenAndDistinguishExpression
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseParenAndDistinguishExpression(canBeArrow: boolean): N.Expression {
const startPos = this.state.start;
const startLoc = this.state.startLoc;
let val;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseMaybeAssign
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseMaybeAssign(
noIn?: ?boolean,
refExpressionErrors?: ?ExpressionErrors,
afterLeftParse?: Function,
refNeedsArrowPos?: ?Pos,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseCallExpressionArguments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseCallExpressionArguments(
close: TokenType,
possibleAsyncArrow: boolean,
dynamicImport?: boolean,
allowPlaceholder?: boolean,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseExprOp
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseExprOp(
left: N.Expression,
leftStartPos: number,
leftStartLoc: Position,
minPrec: number,
Function finishCallExpression
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
finishCallExpression<T: N.CallExpression | N.OptionalCallExpression>(
node: T,
optional: boolean,
): N.Expression {
if (node.callee.type === "Import") {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseMaybeUnary
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseMaybeUnary(refExpressionErrors: ?ExpressionErrors): N.Expression {
if (this.isContextual("await") && this.isAwaitAllowed()) {
return this.parseAwait();
} else if (this.state.type.prefix) {
const node = this.startNode();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseMaybeAssign
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseMaybeAssign(
noIn?: ?boolean,
refExpressionErrors?: ?ExpressionErrors,
afterLeftParse?: Function,
refNeedsArrowPos?: ?Pos,
Function parseObjectMember
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseObjectMember(
isPattern: boolean,
refExpressionErrors?: ?ExpressionErrors,
): N.ObjectMember | N.SpreadElement | N.RestElement {
let decorators = [];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function checkReservedWord
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkReservedWord(
word: string,
startLoc: number,
checkKeywords: boolean,
isBinding: boolean,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseObjectMember
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseObjectMember(
isPattern: boolean,
refExpressionErrors?: ?ExpressionErrors,
): N.ObjectMember | N.SpreadElement | N.RestElement {
let decorators = [];
Function parseFunctionBody
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseFunctionBody(
node: N.Function,
allowExpression: ?boolean,
isMethod?: boolean = false,
): void {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseFunctionBody
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseFunctionBody(
node: N.Function,
allowExpression: ?boolean,
isMethod?: boolean = false,
): void {
Function parseMaybeUnary
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseMaybeUnary(refExpressionErrors: ?ExpressionErrors): N.Expression {
if (this.isContextual("await") && this.isAwaitAllowed()) {
return this.parseAwait();
} else if (this.state.type.prefix) {
const node = this.startNode();
Function parseCallExpressionArguments
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseCallExpressionArguments(
close: TokenType,
possibleAsyncArrow: boolean,
dynamicImport?: boolean,
allowPlaceholder?: boolean,
Function checkDuplicatedProto
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkDuplicatedProto(
prop: N.ObjectMember | N.SpreadElement,
protoRef: { used: boolean },
refExpressionErrors: ?ExpressionErrors,
): void {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
this.hasPrecedingLineBreak() ||
// All the following expressions are ambiguous:
// await + 0, await - 0, await ( 0 ), await [ 0 ], await / 0 /u, await ``
this.match(tt.plusMin) ||
Function checkReservedWord
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkReservedWord(
word: string,
startLoc: number,
checkKeywords: boolean,
isBinding: boolean,
Function parseObj
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseObj<T: N.ObjectPattern | N.ObjectExpression>(
close: TokenType,
isPattern: boolean,
isRecord?: ?boolean,
refExpressionErrors?: ?ExpressionErrors,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseObjectProperty
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseObjectProperty(
prop: N.ObjectProperty,
startPos: ?number,
startLoc: ?Position,
isPattern: boolean,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseObj
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseObj<T: N.ObjectPattern | N.ObjectExpression>(
close: TokenType,
isPattern: boolean,
isRecord?: ?boolean,
refExpressionErrors?: ?ExpressionErrors,
Function parseExprList
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseExprList(
close: TokenType,
allowEmpty?: boolean,
refExpressionErrors?: ?ExpressionErrors,
nodeForExtra?: ?N.Node,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseAwait
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseAwait(): N.AwaitExpression {
const node = this.startNode();
this.next();
Function parseObjectProperty
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseObjectProperty(
prop: N.ObjectProperty,
startPos: ?number,
startLoc: ?Position,
isPattern: boolean,
Function parseNew
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseNew(): N.NewExpression | N.MetaProperty {
const node = this.startNode();
let meta = this.startNode();
this.next();
Function parseExprListItem
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseExprListItem(
allowEmpty: ?boolean,
refExpressionErrors?: ?ExpressionErrors,
refNeedsArrowPos: ?Pos,
allowPlaceholder: ?boolean,
Function parseNew
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseNew(): N.NewExpression | N.MetaProperty {
const node = this.startNode();
let meta = this.startNode();
this.next();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseAwait
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseAwait(): N.AwaitExpression {
const node = this.startNode();
this.next();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseIdentifierName
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseIdentifierName(pos: number, liberal?: boolean): string {
let name: string;
if (this.match(tt.name)) {
name = this.state.value;
Function body
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(hasStrictModeDirective: boolean) => {
const nonSimple = !this.isSimpleParamList(node.params);
if (hasStrictModeDirective && nonSimple) {
// This logic is here to align the error location with the ESTree plugin.
Function parseIdentifierName
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseIdentifierName(pos: number, liberal?: boolean): string {
let name: string;
if (this.match(tt.name)) {
name = this.state.value;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseObjectMethod
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseObjectMethod(
prop: N.ObjectMethod,
isGenerator: boolean,
isAsync: boolean,
isPattern: boolean,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseYield
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseYield(noIn?: ?boolean): N.YieldExpression {
const node = this.startNode();
if (this.state.inParameters) {
this.raise(node.start, Errors.YieldInParameter);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return base;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ret;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.finishNode(node, "BindExpression");
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return id;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.finishNode(node, "PipelinePrimaryTopicReference");
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.parseTaggedTemplateExpression(
startPos,
startLoc,
base,
state,
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return node;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return node;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.finishNode(node, "NullLiteral");
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.finishNode(node, "TupleExpression");
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.finishNode(node, "ArrayExpression");
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.parseFunction(node, undefined, true);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return node;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return node;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ret;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.parseClass(node, false);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return node;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.finishNode(node, "DoExpression");
Function parseMetaProperty
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseMetaProperty(
node: N.MetaProperty,
meta: N.Identifier,
propertyName: string,
): N.MetaProperty {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parsePropertyName
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parsePropertyName(
prop: N.ObjectOrClassMember | N.ClassMember | N.TsNamedTypeElementBase,
isPrivateNameAllowed: boolean,
): N.Expression | N.Identifier {
if (this.eat(tt.bracketL)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function checkGetterSetterParams
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkGetterSetterParams(method: N.ObjectMethod | N.ClassMethod): void {
const paramCount = this.getGetterSetterExpectedParamCount(method);
const start = method.start;
if (method.params.length !== paramCount) {
if (method.kind === "get") {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseExprListItem
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseExprListItem(
allowEmpty: ?boolean,
refExpressionErrors?: ?ExpressionErrors,
refNeedsArrowPos: ?Pos,
allowPlaceholder: ?boolean,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
withTopicPermittingContext<T>(callback: () => T): T {
const outerContextTopicState = this.state.topicContext;
this.state.topicContext = {
// Enable the use of the primary topic reference.
maxNumOfResolvableTopics: 1,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
withTopicForbiddingContext<T>(callback: () => T): T {
const outerContextTopicState = this.state.topicContext;
this.state.topicContext = {
// Disable the use of the primary topic reference.
maxNumOfResolvableTopics: 0,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.state.inParameters) {
this.raise(node.start, Errors.AwaitExpressionFormalParameter);
} else if (this.state.awaitPos === -1) {
this.state.awaitPos = node.start;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.state.inParameters) {
this.raise(node.start, Errors.YieldInParameter);
} else if (this.state.yieldPos === -1) {
this.state.yieldPos = node.start;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
withSoloAwaitPermittingContext<T>(callback: () => T): T {
const outerContextSoloAwaitState = this.state.soloAwait;
this.state.soloAwait = true;
try {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (isPattern) {
this.next();
// Don't use parseRestBinding() as we only allow Identifier here.
prop.argument = this.parseIdentifier();
this.checkCommaAfterRest(charCodes.rightCurlyBrace);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (method.params.length !== paramCount) {
if (method.kind === "get") {
this.raise(start, Errors.BadGetterArity);
} else {
this.raise(start, Errors.BadSetterArity);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
!this.match(tt.parenL) &&
!this.match(tt.bracketL) &&
!this.match(tt.dot)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.match(tt.num) || this.match(tt.string) || this.match(tt.bigint)
? this.parseExprAtom()
: this.parseMaybePrivateName(isPrivateNameAllowed);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76