Showing 6 of 6 total issues
Method gc_stats
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.gc_stats
collected = nil
puts "Respond to? #{ObjectSpace.respond_to? :live_objects}"
if ObjectSpace.respond_to? :live_objects
live = ObjectSpace.live_objects
Method gc_stats
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.gc_stats
collected = nil
puts "Respond to? #{ObjectSpace.respond_to? :live_objects}"
if ObjectSpace.respond_to? :live_objects
live = ObjectSpace.live_objects
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.call(env)
if !@@gc_stats_enabled
GC.enable_stats if GC.respond_to? :enable_stats # for REE
GC::Profiler.enable if defined? GC::Profiler # for 1.9.3+
@@gc_stats_enabled = true
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_os
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.add_os(c, s, options = {})
print_objects = options["print_objects"]
small = options["small"]
min = options["min"]
show_fields = options["show_fields"]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method memcheck
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.memcheck(top, klass = Object, mode = :normal)
top ||= 50
os = Hash.new(0)
ObjectSpace.each_object(klass) do |o|
begin;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_os
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.add_os(c, s, options = {})
print_objects = options["print_objects"]
small = options["small"]
min = options["min"]
show_fields = options["show_fields"]