Showing 115 of 121 total issues
Method to_latex_code
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_latex_code
if get_setting(:latex_use_listings)
@doc.latex_require_package('listings')
s = "\\lstset{columns=fixed,frame=shadowbox}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method read_inline_html
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_inline_html(src, con)
h = HTMLHelper.new
begin
# This is our current buffer in the context
next_stuff = src.current_remaining_buffer
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method read_simple
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_simple(src, escaped, exit_on_chars=nil, exit_on_strings=nil, warn=true)
Method read_indented_content
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_indented_content(src, indentation, break_list, item_type, ial_offset=0)
Method md_ref_def
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def md_ref_def(ref_id, url, title=nil, meta={}, al=nil)
Method span_descendents
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def span_descendents(e)
descendents = []
e.each_element do |c|
name = c.respond_to?(:name) ? c.name : nil
if name && HTML_INLINE_ELEMS.include?(c.name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method close_script_style
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def close_script_style
tag = @tag_stack.last
# See http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#C_4 for character sequences not allowed within an element body.
if @already =~ /<|&|\]\]>|--/
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_html_equation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_html_equation
mathml = get_setting(:html_math_output_mathml) && render_mathml(:equation, self.math)
png = get_setting(:html_math_output_png) && render_png(:equation, self.math)
div = xelem('div')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convert_to_mathml_blahtex
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convert_to_mathml_blahtex(kind, tex)
result = run_blahtex(tex, %w[--mathml])
doc = REXML::Document.new(result)
mathml = doc.get_elements('//markup').to_a.first
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extract_chunks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_chunks(is, start_reg, end_reg)
all = []
current = nil; current_start = nil
line = 1
is.each_line do |l|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :olist if self =~ /\A[ ]{0,3}\d+\.\s+.*/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :raw_html if self =~ %r{\A[ ]{0,3}</?\s*\w+}
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :code if number_of_leading_spaces >= 4
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :quote if self =~ /\A>/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :text if self =~ /\A[ ]{0,3}#{EMailAddress}/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :ulist if self =~ /\A[ ]{0,3}([\*\-\+])\s+.*/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :hrule if self =~ /\A(\s*[\*\-_]\s*){3,}\z/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :raw_html if self =~ /\A[ ]{0,3}<\!\-\-/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :header1 if self =~ /\A(=)+/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :header2 if self =~ /\A([-\s])+\z/