Showing 13 of 13 total issues
Method well_formatted_reference
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def well_formatted_reference(options={})
verse_range_separator = options.fetch(:verse_range_separator, "–") # en-dash
chapter_range_separator = options.fetch(:chapter_range_separator, "—") # em-dash
verse_list_separator = options.fetch(:verse_list_separator, ", ")
chapter_list_separator = options.fetch(:chapter_list_separator, "; ")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_ranges
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_ranges(book, ranges)
default_chapter = nil
default_chapter = 1 unless book_has_chapters?(book)
default_verse = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Pericope
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Pericope
extend Pericope::Parsing
include Enumerable
attr_reader :book, :original_string, :ranges
Method well_formatted_reference
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def well_formatted_reference(options={})
verse_range_separator = options.fetch(:verse_range_separator, "–") # en-dash
chapter_range_separator = options.fetch(:chapter_range_separator, "—") # em-dash
verse_list_separator = options.fetch(:verse_list_separator, ", ")
chapter_list_separator = options.fetch(:chapter_list_separator, "; ")
Method parse_ranges
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_ranges(book, ranges)
default_chapter = nil
default_chapter = 1 unless book_has_chapters?(book)
default_verse = nil
Method split
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def split(text)
segments = []
start = 0
match_all(text) do |attributes, match|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if !always_print_verse_range && range.begin.verse == 1 && range.begin.whole? && (range.end.verse > last_verse || range.end.whole? && range.end.verse == last_verse) && (touched_chapters - [range.begin.chapter]).none?
s << range.begin.chapter.to_s
s << "#{chapter_range_separator}#{range.end.chapter}" if range.end.chapter > range.begin.chapter
else
if range.begin.partial? && range.begin.verse == recent_verse
Method group_array_into_ranges
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def group_array_into_ranges(verses)
return [] if verses.nil? or verses.empty?
verses = verses.flatten.compact.sort.map { |verse| Verse.parse(verse) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method next
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def next
if partial? && (next_letter = letter.succ) <= Pericope.max_letter
return self.class.new(book, chapter, verse, next_letter)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_reference_fragment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_reference_fragment(input, default_chapter: nil, default_verse: nil)
chapter, verse, letter = input.match(Pericope.fragment_regexp).captures
chapter = default_chapter unless chapter
chapter, verse = [verse, nil] unless chapter
verse = default_verse unless verse
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(book, chapter, verse, letter=nil)
super
raise ArgumentError, "#{book} is not a valid book" if book < 1 || book > 66
raise ArgumentError, "#{chapter} is not a valid chapter" if chapter < 1 || chapter > Pericope.get_max_chapter(book)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method intersects?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def intersects?(other)
return false unless other.is_a?(Pericope)
return false unless book == other.book
ranges.each do |self_range|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method each
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def each
return to_enum unless block_given?
if self.begin == self.end
yield self.begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"