Showing 7 of 23 total issues
Method as_mpns_xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def as_mpns_xml
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new
xml.instruct!
if data[:type] != :raw
xml.tag!('wp:Notification', 'xmlns:wp' => 'WPNotification') do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method push
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def push(notifications)
conn = APNSConnection.open @certificate, @sandbox, @pass, @options
binaries = notifications.each_with_object([]) do |notif, binaries|
notif.each_message(binaries.count) do |msg|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method push
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def push(notifications)
conn = APNSConnection.open @certificate, @sandbox, @pass, @options
binaries = notifications.each_with_object([]) do |notif, binaries|
notif.each_message(binaries.count) do |msg|
Method as_wns_xml
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def as_wns_xml
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new
xml.instruct!
if data[:type] != :raw
case data[:type]
Method as_mpns_xml
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def as_mpns_xml
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new
xml.instruct!
if data[:type] != :raw
xml.tag!('wp:Notification', 'xmlns:wp' => 'WPNotification') do
Method build_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_hash(xml, options)
return unless options
options.each do |k, v|
xml.tag!(k.to_s) { v.is_a?(Hash) ? build_hash(xml, v) : xml.text!(v.to_s) }
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method as_wns_xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def as_wns_xml
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new
xml.instruct!
if data[:type] != :raw
case data[:type]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"