Showing 132 of 167 total issues
Method radial_gradient
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def radial_gradient(position_or_angle, shape_and_size, *color_stops)
# Have to deal with variable length/meaning arguments.
if color_stop?(shape_and_size)
color_stops.unshift(shape_and_size)
shape_and_size = nil
Method examine
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def examine(io)
class << io
unless method_defined?(:readbyte)
def readbyte
getc
Method to_sass_plugin_options
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_sass_plugin_options
locations = []
locations << [sass_path, css_path] if sass_path && css_path
Compass::Frameworks::ALL.each do |framework|
locations << [framework.stylesheets_directory, File.join(css_path || css_dir || ".", framework.name)]
Method write_file
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write_file(file_name, contents, options = nil, binary = false)
options ||= self.options if self.respond_to?(:options)
skip_write = false
contents = process_erb(contents, options[:erb]) if options[:erb]
if File.exists?(file_name)
Method search_index
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def search_index
id = 0;
idx = {
"approximate" => {},
"terms" => {},
Method compile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compile(sass_filename, css_filename, sourcemap_filename = nil)
css_content, sourcemap = logger.red do
timed(lambda {|r| r[0]}) do
engine = engine(sass_filename, css_filename, sourcemap_filename)
if sourcemap_filename && options[:sourcemap]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method url_join
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def url_join(*args)
args.inject("") do |m, a|
m << "/" unless m.end_with?('/') || a.start_with?('/') if m.length > 0
m.gsub!(%r{/+$}, '') if a.start_with?('/')
m << a
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method expand_url_path
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def expand_url_path(url)
# We remove the leading path otherwise we think there's an extra segment that can be removed
prefix = "/" if url.start_with?("/")
segments = url.gsub(%r{//+}, '/').split("/")
segments.shift if prefix
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method headers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def headers(from = nil, to = nil)
if from && !to
if from.is_a?(Sass::Script::Value::String) && from.value == "all"
from = number(1)
to = number(6)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method list_of_color_stops?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_of_color_stops?(arg)
if arg.respond_to?(:value)
arg.value.is_a?(Array) && arg.value.all?{|a| color_stop?(a)} ? arg.value : nil
elsif arg.is_a?(Array)
arg.all?{|a| color_stop?(a)} ? arg : nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method debug
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def debug
normalized_attrs = {}
(ATTRIBUTES + ARRAY_ATTRIBUTES).each do |prop|
values = []
chain.each do |instance|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method execute
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def execute
if options[:custom]
version = ""
version << "#{Compass.version[:major]}" if options[:major]
version << ".#{Compass.version[:minor]}" if options[:minor]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method radial_gradient
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def radial_gradient(position_or_angle, shape_and_size, *color_stops)
# Have to deal with variable length/meaning arguments.
if color_stop?(shape_and_size)
color_stops.unshift(shape_and_size)
shape_and_size = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method prefixed_usage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def prefixed_usage(prefix, capability, capability_options_list)
assert_valid_prefix prefix
assert_valid_capability capability
usage = 0
browsers_with_prefix(prefix).each do |browser|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method serialize_to_config
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def serialize_to_config(prop)
if v = @data.raw(prop)
"#{prop} = #{v.inspect}"
else
s = ""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_configuration_property
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_configuration_property(name, comment = nil, &default)
ATTRIBUTES << name
if comment.is_a?(String)
unless comment[0..0] == "#"
comment = "# #{comment}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compass_extensions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compass_extensions
exts = Sass::Util.ordered_hash(identifier("compass") => quoted_string(Compass::Core::VERSION))
if defined?(Compass::Frameworks::ALL)
Compass::Frameworks::ALL.each do |framework|
next if framework.name == "compass"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convert_angle_from_offical
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convert_angle_from_offical(deg)
if deg.is_a?(Sass::Script::Value::Number)
return number((deg.value.to_f - 450).abs % 360, 'deg')
else
args = deg.value
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method new
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.new(*args)
instance = super
instance.extend(Compass::ImportOnce::Engine)
if i = instance.options[:importer]
i.extend(Compass::ImportOnce::Importer) unless i.is_a?(Compass::ImportOnce::Importer)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method all_mixins
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def all_mixins
@items.inject([]) do |all_mixins, item|
next all_mixins unless item.identifier =~ %r{/reference}
next all_mixins unless item[:stylesheet]
all_mixins += mixins(item).map{|m| [item, m] }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"