Showing 21 of 21 total issues
Method plus
has a Cognitive Complexity of 38 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def plus(path1, path2) # -> path # :nodoc:
prefix2 = path2
index_list2 = []
basename_list2 = []
while r2 = chop_basename(prefix2)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method relative_path_from
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def relative_path_from(base_directory)
dest_directory = self.cleanpath.to_s
base_directory = base_directory.cleanpath.to_s
dest_prefix = dest_directory
dest_names = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (source, options, context) {
/*
Workaround to make IO work,
webpack polyfill global "process" module by default,
while Opal::IO rely on it to deterimine in node environment or not
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(source) {
var result = {}
const filename = this.resourcePath
const globalOptions = this.options.opal || {}
Method basename
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def basename(name, suffix=nil)
%x{
var p, q, e, f = 0, n = -1, tmp, pointerMath, origName;
if (name === nil) {
Method encode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.encode(ary)
result = []
ary.each do |n|
vlq = n < 0 ? ((-n) << 1) + 1 : n << 1
loop do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method join
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def join(*args)
return self if args.empty?
result = args.pop
result = Pathname.new(result) unless Pathname === result
return result if result.absolute?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extname
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extname(path)
raise TypeError, 'no implicit conversion of nil into String' if path.nil?
path = path.to_path if path.respond_to?(:to_path)
raise TypeError, "no implicit conversion of #{path.class} into String" unless path.is_a?(String)
filename = basename(path)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method plus
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def plus(path1, path2) # -> path # :nodoc:
prefix2 = path2
index_list2 = []
basename_list2 = []
while r2 = chop_basename(prefix2)
Function exports
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (source, options, context) {
/*
Workaround to make IO work,
webpack polyfill global "process" module by default,
while Opal::IO rely on it to deterimine in node environment or not
Method relative_path_from
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def relative_path_from(base_directory)
dest_directory = self.cleanpath.to_s
base_directory = base_directory.cleanpath.to_s
dest_prefix = dest_directory
dest_names = []
Function createBundledCompiler
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createBundledCompiler(filename) {
const env = process.env
console.log(`Bundle derived compiler ${filename} doesn't exist. Creating!`)
const compilerPath = path.resolve(__dirname, 'compiler.rb')
// our patches live in lib / same directory as this file
Method dirname
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dirname(path)
%x{
if (path === nil) {
#{raise TypeError, 'no implicit conversion of nil into String'}
}
Function exports
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var cache = module.exports = function(params, callback) {
// Spread params into named variables
// Forgive user whenever possible
var source = params.source;
var options = params.options || {};
Function read
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var read = function(filename, callback) {
return fs.readFile(filename, function(err, data) {
if (err) { return callback(err); }
return zlib.gunzip(data, function(err, content) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method expand_path
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def expand_path(path, basedir = nil)
path = [basedir, path].compact.join(SEPARATOR)
parts = path.split(SEPARATOR)
new_parts = []
parts[0] = Dir.home if parts.first == '~'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(path)
if Pathname === path
@path = path.path.to_s
elsif path.respond_to?(:to_path)
@path = path.to_path
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(compiler, source, resourcePath, rawResult, generatedSource) {
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(source) {
var result = {}
const filename = this.resourcePath
const globalOptions = this.options.opal || {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getRubyOutput
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getRubyOutput(mriRequires) {
const stubCode = opalVersion.indexOf('0.9') == -1 ? 'Opal::Config.stubbed_files' : 'Opal::Processor.stubbed_files'
const flatRequires = mriRequires.map(req => `require '${req}'`).join(';')
const mriPathsVariable = env.RAILS_ENV ? 'Rails.application.assets.paths' : 'Opal.paths'
const rubyCode = `${flatRequires}; puts({loadPath: ${mriPathsVariable}, stubs: ${stubCode}.to_a}.to_json)`
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"