Showing 548 of 1,705 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_data_type("vim.host.NetworkPolicy.NicFailureCriteria", "HostNicFailureCriteria", "vmodl.DynamicData", "vim.version.version1", [["checkSpeed", "string", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["speed", "int", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["checkDuplex", "boolean", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["fullDuplex", "boolean", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["checkErrorPercent", "boolean", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["percentage", "int", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["checkBeacon", "boolean", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_data_type("vim.dvs.VmwareDistributedVirtualSwitch.FailureCriteria", "DVSFailureCriteria", "vim.InheritablePolicy", "vim.version.version5", [["checkSpeed", "vim.StringPolicy", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["speed", "vim.IntPolicy", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["checkDuplex", "vim.BoolPolicy", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["fullDuplex", "vim.BoolPolicy", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["checkErrorPercent", "vim.BoolPolicy", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["percentage", "vim.IntPolicy", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["checkBeacon", "vim.BoolPolicy", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_data_type("vim.cluster.VmToolsMonitoringSettings", "ClusterVmToolsMonitoringSettings", "vmodl.DynamicData", "vim.version.version5", [["enabled", "boolean", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["vmMonitoring", "string", "vim.version.version6", {:optional => true}], ["clusterSettings", "boolean", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["failureInterval", "int", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["minUpTime", "int", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["maxFailures", "int", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["maxFailureWindow", "int", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_data_type("vim.cluster.RuleInfo", "ClusterRuleInfo", "vmodl.DynamicData", "vim.version.version1", [["key", "int", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["status", "vim.ManagedEntity.Status", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["enabled", "boolean", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["name", "string", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["mandatory", "boolean", "vim.version.version6", {:optional => true}], ["userCreated", "boolean", "vim.version.version6", {:optional => true}], ["inCompliance", "boolean", "vim.version.version6", {:optional => true}]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_data_type("vim.vm.DefaultPowerOpInfo", "VirtualMachineDefaultPowerOpInfo", "vmodl.DynamicData", "vim.version.version1", [["powerOffType", "string", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["suspendType", "string", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["resetType", "string", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["defaultPowerOffType", "string", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["defaultSuspendType", "string", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["defaultResetType", "string", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["standbyAction", "string", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_data_type("vim.vm.RelocateSpec", "VirtualMachineRelocateSpec", "vmodl.DynamicData", "vim.version.version1", [["datastore", "vim.Datastore", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["diskMoveType", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["pool", "vim.ResourcePool", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["host", "vim.HostSystem", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["disk", "vim.vm.RelocateSpec.DiskLocator[]", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["transform", "vim.vm.RelocateSpec.Transformation", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["files", "vim.vm.FileInfo", "vim.version.dev", {:optional => true}]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when 'hp'
raise 'HP options are missing' unless options.has_key?(:hp)
raise "Invalid HP options, Hash expected, #{options[:hp].class} given" unless options[:hp].is_a?(Hash)
raise 'HP access key is missing' unless options[:hp].has_key?(:hp_access_key)
raise 'HP secret key is missing' unless options[:hp].has_key?(:hp_secret_key)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_data_type("vim.dvs.PortCriteria", "DistributedVirtualSwitchPortCriteria", "vmodl.DynamicData", "vim.version.version5", [["connected", "boolean", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["active", "boolean", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["uplinkPort", "boolean", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["scope", "vim.ManagedEntity", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["portgroupKey", "string[]", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["inside", "boolean", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["portKey", "string[]", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_data_type("vim.dvs.ProductSpec", "DistributedVirtualSwitchProductSpec", "vmodl.DynamicData", "vim.version.version5", [["name", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["vendor", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["version", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["build", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["forwardingClass", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["bundleId", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["bundleUrl", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_snapshot(snapshot_id)
with_thread_name("delete_snapshot(#{snapshot_id})") do
@logger.info("Deleting snapshot `#{snapshot_id}'...")
snapshot = with_openstack { @openstack.snapshots.get(snapshot_id) }
if snapshot- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_data_type("vim.vApp.IpPool.IpPoolConfigInfo", "IpPoolIpPoolConfigInfo", "vmodl.DynamicData", "vim.version.version5", [["subnetAddress", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["netmask", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["gateway", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["range", "string", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["dns", "string[]", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["dhcpServerAvailable", "boolean", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["ipPoolEnabled", "boolean", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_data_type("vim.dvs.DistributedVirtualPort.Setting", "DVPortSetting", "vmodl.DynamicData", "vim.version.version5", [["blocked", "vim.BoolPolicy", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["vmDirectPathGen2Allowed", "vim.BoolPolicy", "vim.version.version6", {:optional => true}], ["inShapingPolicy", "vim.dvs.DistributedVirtualPort.TrafficShapingPolicy", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["outShapingPolicy", "vim.dvs.DistributedVirtualPort.TrafficShapingPolicy", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["overlayParameter", "vim.dvs.DistributedVirtualPort.OverlayParameterPolicy", "vim.version.dev", {:optional => true}], ["vendorSpecificConfig", "vim.dvs.DistributedVirtualPort.VendorSpecificConfig", "vim.version.version5", {:optional => true}], ["networkResourcePoolKey", "vim.StringPolicy", "vim.version.version7", {:optional => true}]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_disk(disk_id)
with_thread_name("delete_disk(#{disk_id})") do
@logger.info("Deleting volume `#{disk_id}'...")
volume = with_openstack { @openstack.volumes.get(disk_id) }
if volume- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when 'openstack'
raise 'OpenStack options are missing' unless options.has_key?(:openstack)
raise "Invalid OpenStack options, Hash expected, #{options[:openstack].class} given" unless options[:openstack].is_a?(Hash)
raise 'OpenStack authorization URL is missing' unless options[:openstack].has_key?(:openstack_auth_url)
raise 'OpenStack user name is missing' unless options[:openstack].has_key?(:openstack_username)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (ms concreteMetadataService) GetInstanceID() (string, error) {
url := fmt.Sprintf("%s/latest/meta-data/instance-id", ms.metadataHost)
resp, err := http.Get(url)
if err != nil {
return "", bosherr.WrapError(err, "Getting instance id from url")- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 144.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (ms concreteMetadataService) GetPublicKey() (string, error) {
url := fmt.Sprintf("%s/latest/meta-data/public-keys/0/openssh-key", ms.metadataHost)
resp, err := http.Get(url)
if err != nil {
return "", bosherr.WrapError(err, "Getting open ssh key")- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 144.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_managed_type("vim.TaskHistoryCollector", "TaskHistoryCollector", "vim.HistoryCollector", "vim.version.version1", [["latestPage", "vim.TaskInfo[]", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}, nil]], [["readNext", "ReadNextTasks", "vim.version.version1", [["maxCount", "int", "vim.version.version1", {}, nil]], [{:optional => true}, "vim.TaskInfo[]", "vim.TaskInfo[]"], nil, nil], ["readPrev", "ReadPreviousTasks", "vim.version.version1", [["maxCount", "int", "vim.version.version1", {}, nil]], [{:optional => true}, "vim.TaskInfo[]", "vim.TaskInfo[]"], nil, nil]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_managed_type("vim.event.EventHistoryCollector", "EventHistoryCollector", "vim.HistoryCollector", "vim.version.version1", [["latestPage", "vim.event.Event[]", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}, nil]], [["readNext", "ReadNextEvents", "vim.version.version1", [["maxCount", "int", "vim.version.version1", {}, nil]], [{:optional => true}, "vim.event.Event[]", "vim.event.Event[]"], nil, nil], ["readPrev", "ReadPreviousEvents", "vim.version.version1", [["maxCount", "int", "vim.version.version1", {}, nil]], [{:optional => true}, "vim.event.Event[]", "vim.event.Event[]"], nil, nil]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func ext۰syscall۰Read(fn *ssa.Function, args []value) value {
// func Read(fd int, p []byte) (n int, err error)
fd := args[0].(int)
p := args[1].([]value)
b := make([]byte, len(p))- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 139.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
create_data_type("vim.PerformanceManager.QuerySpec", "PerfQuerySpec", "vmodl.DynamicData", "vim.version.version1", [["entity", "vmodl.ManagedObject", "vim.version.version1"], ["startTime", "vmodl.DateTime", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["endTime", "vmodl.DateTime", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["maxSample", "int", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["metricId", "vim.PerformanceManager.MetricId[]", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["intervalId", "int", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}], ["format", "string", "vim.version.version1", {:optional => true}]])- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76