Showing 209 of 252 total issues
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( elem && elem.parentNode ) {
// Handle the case where IE, Opera, and Webkit return items
// by name instead of ID
if ( elem.id === m ) {
results.push( elem );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( ( ofType ? node.nodeName.toLowerCase() === name : node.nodeType === 1 ) && ++diff ) {
// Cache the index of each encountered element
if ( useCache ) {
(node[ expando ] || (node[ expando ] = {}))[ type ] = [ dirruns, diff ];
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if ( cache[1] === true ) {
return true;
}
Function Test
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
var Test = function(name, testName, expected, testEnvironmentArg, async, callback) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if(typeof options['onProgress'] === 'function'){
options['onProgress'](0);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
if (element.data('params')) data = data + "&" + element.data('params');
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
Open
if ( !jQuery.support.opacity ) {
jQuery.cssHooks.opacity = {
get: function( elem, computed ) {
// IE uses filters for opacity
return ropacity.test( (computed && elem.currentStyle ? elem.currentStyle.filter : elem.style.filter) || "" ) ?
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
Open
if ( support.matchesSelector && documentIsHTML &&
( !rbuggyMatches || !rbuggyMatches.test( expr ) ) &&
( !rbuggyQSA || !rbuggyQSA.test( expr ) ) ) {
try {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
Open
if ( matcher[ expando ] ) {
// Find the next relative operator (if any) for proper handling
j = ++i;
for ( ; j < len; j++ ) {
if ( Expr.relative[ tokens[j].type ] ) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
Open
if ( (!id || !cache[id] || (!pvt && !cache[id].data)) && data === undefined && typeof name === "string" ) {
return;
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
Open
if ( s.crossDomain == null ) {
parts = rurl.exec( s.url.toLowerCase() );
s.crossDomain = !!( parts &&
( parts[ 1 ] !== ajaxLocParts[ 1 ] || parts[ 2 ] !== ajaxLocParts[ 2 ] ||
( parts[ 3 ] || ( parts[ 1 ] === "http:" ? "80" : "443" ) ) !==
Function on
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
on: function( types, selector, data, fn, /*INTERNAL*/ one ) {
Function augmentWidthOrHeight
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
function augmentWidthOrHeight( elem, name, extra, isBorderBox, styles ) {
Function Tween
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
function Tween( elem, options, prop, end, easing ) {
Function add
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data, selector ) {
Function CHILD
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
"CHILD": function( type, what, argument, first, last ) {
Function remove
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
remove: function( elem, types, handler, selector, mappedTypes ) {
Function superMatcher
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
superMatcher = function( seed, context, xml, results, expandContext ) {
Function condense
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
function condense( unmatched, map, filter, context, xml ) {
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def create
Room.with_room(params[:room_id], current_user) do |room|
render_room_not_found(params[:room_id]) and return unless room
files = (params["files"] || {}).values
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"