Function buffer has a Cognitive Complexity of 733 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],"buffer":[function(require,module,exports){
/*!
* The buffer module from node.js, for the browser.
*
* @author Feross Aboukhadijeh <https://feross.org>- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function buffer has 1322 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],"buffer":[function(require,module,exports){
/*!
* The buffer module from node.js, for the browser.
*
* @author Feross Aboukhadijeh <https://feross.org>File buffer.js has 1518 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require=(function(){function r(e,n,t){function o(i,f){if(!n[i]){if(!e[i]){var c="function"==typeof require&&require;if(!f&&c)return c(i,!0);if(u)return u(i,!0);var a=new Error("Cannot find module '"+i+"'");throw a.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",a}var p=n[i]={exports:{}};e[i][0].call(p.exports,function(r){var n=e[i][1][r];return o(n||r)},p,p.exports,r,e,n,t)}return n[i].exports}for(var u="function"==typeof require&&require,i=0;i<t.length;i++)o(t[i]);return o}return r})()({1:[function(require,module,exports){
'use strict'
exports.byteLength = byteLength
exports.toByteArray = toByteArrayFunction 2 has a Cognitive Complexity of 57 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],2:[function(require,module,exports){
exports.read = function (buffer, offset, isLE, mLen, nBytes) {
var e, m
var eLen = (nBytes * 8) - mLen - 1
var eMax = (1 << eLen) - 1- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function 1 has 117 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require=(function(){function r(e,n,t){function o(i,f){if(!n[i]){if(!e[i]){var c="function"==typeof require&&require;if(!f&&c)return c(i,!0);if(u)return u(i,!0);var a=new Error("Cannot find module '"+i+"'");throw a.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",a}var p=n[i]={exports:{}};e[i][0].call(p.exports,function(r){var n=e[i][1][r];return o(n||r)},p,p.exports,r,e,n,t)}return n[i].exports}for(var u="function"==typeof require&&require,i=0;i<t.length;i++)o(t[i]);return o}return r})()({1:[function(require,module,exports){
'use strict'
exports.byteLength = byteLength
exports.toByteArray = toByteArrayFunction 1 has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require=(function(){function r(e,n,t){function o(i,f){if(!n[i]){if(!e[i]){var c="function"==typeof require&&require;if(!f&&c)return c(i,!0);if(u)return u(i,!0);var a=new Error("Cannot find module '"+i+"'");throw a.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",a}var p=n[i]={exports:{}};e[i][0].call(p.exports,function(r){var n=e[i][1][r];return o(n||r)},p,p.exports,r,e,n,t)}return n[i].exports}for(var u="function"==typeof require&&require,i=0;i<t.length;i++)o(t[i]);return o}return r})()({1:[function(require,module,exports){
'use strict'
exports.byteLength = byteLength
exports.toByteArray = toByteArray- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function 2 has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],2:[function(require,module,exports){
exports.read = function (buffer, offset, isLE, mLen, nBytes) {
var e, m
var eLen = (nBytes * 8) - mLen - 1
var eMax = (1 << eLen) - 1Function utf8Slice has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function utf8Slice (buf, start, end) {
end = Math.min(buf.length, end)
var res = []
var i = startFunction utf8ToBytes has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function utf8ToBytes (string, units) {
units = units || Infinity
var codePoint
var length = string.length
var leadSurrogate = nullFunction write has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Buffer.prototype.write = function write (string, offset, length, encoding) {
// Buffer#write(string)
if (offset === undefined) {
encoding = 'utf8'
length = this.lengthFunction arrayIndexOf has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function arrayIndexOf (arr, val, byteOffset, encoding, dir) {
var indexSize = 1
var arrLength = arr.length
var valLength = val.length
Function fill has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Buffer.prototype.fill = function fill (val, start, end, encoding) {
// Handle string cases:
if (typeof val === 'string') {
if (typeof start === 'string') {
encoding = startFunction compare has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Buffer.prototype.compare = function compare (target, start, end, thisStart, thisEnd) {
if (!Buffer.isBuffer(target)) {
throw new TypeError('Argument must be a Buffer')
}
Function slowToString has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function slowToString (encoding, start, end) {
var loweredCase = false
// No need to verify that "this.length <= MAX_UINT32" since it's a read-only
// property of a typed array.Function write has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.write = function (buffer, value, offset, isLE, mLen, nBytes) {
var e, m, c
var eLen = (nBytes * 8) - mLen - 1
var eMax = (1 << eLen) - 1
var eBias = eMax >> 1Function bidirectionalIndexOf has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function bidirectionalIndexOf (buffer, val, byteOffset, encoding, dir) {
// Empty buffer means no match
if (buffer.length === 0) return -1
// Normalize byteOffsetFunction byteLength has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function byteLength (string, encoding) {
if (Buffer.isBuffer(string)) {
return string.length
}
if (isArrayBufferView(string) || isArrayBuffer(string)) {Function toByteArray has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function toByteArray (b64) {
var tmp
var lens = getLens(b64)
var validLen = lens[0]
var placeHoldersLen = lens[1]Function copy has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Buffer.prototype.copy = function copy (target, targetStart, start, end) {
if (!start) start = 0
if (!end && end !== 0) end = this.length
if (targetStart >= target.length) targetStart = target.length
if (!targetStart) targetStart = 0Function fromByteArray has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function fromByteArray (uint8) {
var tmp
var len = uint8.length
var extraBytes = len % 3 // if we have 1 byte left, pad 2 bytes
var parts = []Function read has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.read = function (buffer, offset, isLE, mLen, nBytes) {
var e, m
var eLen = (nBytes * 8) - mLen - 1
var eMax = (1 << eLen) - 1
var eBias = eMax >> 1Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (tempCodePoint > 0x7F) {
codePoint = tempCodePoint
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((units -= 3) > -1) bytes.push(0xEF, 0xBF, 0xBD)Function write has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.write = function (buffer, value, offset, isLE, mLen, nBytes) {Function checkInt has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function checkInt (buf, value, offset, ext, max, min) {Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((units -= 3) < 0) breakAvoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (i + 1 === length) {
// unpaired lead
if ((units -= 3) > -1) bytes.push(0xEF, 0xBF, 0xBD)
continue
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (tempCodePoint > 0xFFFF && tempCodePoint < 0x110000) {
codePoint = tempCodePoint
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (tempCodePoint > 0x7FF && (tempCodePoint < 0xD800 || tempCodePoint > 0xDFFF)) {
codePoint = tempCodePoint
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (codePoint < 0x110000) {
if ((units -= 4) < 0) break
bytes.push(
codePoint >> 0x12 | 0xF0,
codePoint >> 0xC & 0x3F | 0x80,Function checkIEEE754 has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function checkIEEE754 (buf, value, offset, ext, max, min) {Function writeFloat has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function writeFloat (buf, value, offset, littleEndian, noAssert) {Function arrayIndexOf has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function arrayIndexOf (arr, val, byteOffset, encoding, dir) {Function read has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.read = function (buffer, offset, isLE, mLen, nBytes) {Function writeDouble has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function writeDouble (buf, value, offset, littleEndian, noAssert) {Function bidirectionalIndexOf has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function bidirectionalIndexOf (buffer, val, byteOffset, encoding, dir) {Function compare has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Buffer.prototype.compare = function compare (target, start, end, thisStart, thisEnd) {Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return fromArrayLike(obj.data)Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return 0Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return Uint8Array.prototype.indexOf.call(buffer, val, byteOffset)Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
if (y < x) return 1Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return Uint8Array.prototype.lastIndexOf.call(buffer, val, byteOffset)Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return arrayIndexOf(buffer, val, byteOffset, encoding, dir)Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return arrayIndexOf(buffer, [ val ], byteOffset, encoding, dir)Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
if (x < y) return -1Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],"buffer":[function(require,module,exports){
/*!
* The buffer module from node.js, for the browser.
*
* @author Feross Aboukhadijeh <https://feross.org>- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 13926.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
require=(function(){function r(e,n,t){function o(i,f){if(!n[i]){if(!e[i]){var c="function"==typeof require&&require;if(!f&&c)return c(i,!0);if(u)return u(i,!0);var a=new Error("Cannot find module '"+i+"'");throw a.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",a}var p=n[i]={exports:{}};e[i][0].call(p.exports,function(r){var n=e[i][1][r];return o(n||r)},p,p.exports,r,e,n,t)}return n[i].exports}for(var u="function"==typeof require&&require,i=0;i<t.length;i++)o(t[i]);return o}return r})()({1:[function(require,module,exports){
'use strict'
exports.byteLength = byteLength
exports.toByteArray = toByteArray- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1382.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],2:[function(require,module,exports){
exports.read = function (buffer, offset, isLE, mLen, nBytes) {
var e, m
var eLen = (nBytes * 8) - mLen - 1
var eMax = (1 << eLen) - 1- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1115.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76