File jquery.js
has 4932 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery JavaScript Library v1.4.4
* http://jquery.com/
*
* Copyright 2010, John Resig
Function jQuery
has 548 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var jQuery = (function() {
// Define a local copy of jQuery
var jQuery = function( selector, context ) {
// The jQuery object is actually just the init constructor 'enhanced'
Function ajax
has 193 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( origSettings ) {
var s = jQuery.extend(true, {}, jQuery.ajaxSettings, origSettings),
jsonp, status, data, type = s.type.toUpperCase(), noContent = rnoContent.test(type);
s.url = s.url.replace( rhash, "" );
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( event.pageX == null && event.clientX != null ) {
var doc = document.documentElement,
body = document.body;
event.pageX = event.clientX + (doc && doc.scrollLeft || body && body.scrollLeft || 0) - (doc && doc.clientLeft || body && body.clientLeft || 0);
Function Sizzle
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var Sizzle = function( selector, context, results, seed ) {
results = results || [];
context = context || document;
var origContext = context;
Function remove
has 92 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function( elem, types, handler, pos ) {
// don't do events on text and comment nodes
if ( elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8 ) {
return;
}
Function add
has 83 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data ) {
if ( elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8 ) {
return;
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( "getBoundingClientRect" in document.documentElement ) {
jQuery.fn.offset = function( options ) {
var elem = this[0], box;
if ( options ) {
Function trigger
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
trigger: function( event, data, elem /*, bubbling */ ) {
// Event object or event type
var type = event.type || event,
bubbling = arguments[3];
Function animate
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
animate: function( prop, speed, easing, callback ) {
var optall = jQuery.speed(speed, easing, callback);
if ( jQuery.isEmptyObject( prop ) ) {
return this.each( optall.complete );
Function val
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
val: function( value ) {
if ( !arguments.length ) {
var elem = this[0];
if ( elem ) {
Function filter
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Sizzle.filter = function( expr, set, inplace, not ) {
var match, anyFound,
old = expr,
result = [],
curLoop = set,
Function init
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function( selector, context ) {
var match, elem, ret, doc;
// Handle $(""), $(null), or $(undefined)
if ( !selector ) {
Function liveHandler
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function liveHandler( event ) {
var stop, maxLevel, related, match, handleObj, elem, j, i, l, data, close, namespace, ret,
elems = [],
selectors = [],
events = jQuery.data( this, this.nodeType ? "events" : "__events__" );
Function clean
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clean: function( elems, context, fragment, scripts ) {
context = context || document;
// !context.createElement fails in IE with an error but returns typeof 'object'
if ( typeof context.createElement === "undefined" ) {
Function attr
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
attr: function( elem, name, value, pass ) {
// don't set attributes on text and comment nodes
if ( !elem || elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8 ) {
return undefined;
}
Function offset
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn.offset = function( options ) {
var elem = this[0];
if ( options ) {
return this.each(function( i ) {
Function domManip
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
domManip: function( args, table, callback ) {
var results, first, fragment, parent,
value = args[0],
scripts = [];
Function closest
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
closest: function( selectors, context ) {
var ret = [], i, l, cur = this[0];
if ( jQuery.isArray( selectors ) ) {
var match, selector,
Function CHILD
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
CHILD: function( elem, match ) {
var type = match[1],
node = elem;
switch ( type ) {
Function onreadystatechange
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var onreadystatechange = xhr.onreadystatechange = function( isTimeout ) {
// The request was aborted
if ( !xhr || xhr.readyState === 0 || isTimeout === "abort" ) {
// Opera doesn't call onreadystatechange before this point
// so we simulate the call
Function name
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn[ name ] = function( types, data, fn, origSelector /* Internal Use Only */ ) {
var type, i = 0, match, namespaces, preType,
selector = origSelector || this.selector,
context = origSelector ? this : jQuery( this.context );
Function handle
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
handle: function( event ) {
var all, handlers, namespaces, namespace_re, events,
namespace_sort = [],
args = jQuery.makeArray( arguments );
Function step
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
step: function( gotoEnd ) {
var t = jQuery.now(), done = true;
if ( gotoEnd || t >= this.options.duration + this.startTime ) {
this.now = this.end;
Function load
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
load: function( url, params, callback ) {
if ( typeof url !== "string" && _load ) {
return _load.apply( this, arguments );
// Don't do a request if no elements are being requested
Function extend
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.extend = jQuery.fn.extend = function() {
var options, name, src, copy, copyIsArray, clone,
target = arguments[0] || {},
i = 1,
length = arguments.length,
Function data
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
data: function( key, value ) {
var data = null;
if ( typeof key === "undefined" ) {
if ( this.length ) {
Function fix
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
fix: function( event ) {
if ( event[ jQuery.expando ] ) {
return event;
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( match[1] === "nth" ) {
// parse equations like 'even', 'odd', '5', '2n', '3n+2', '4n-1', '-n+6'
var test = /(-?)(\d*)n((?:\+|-)?\d*)/.exec(
match[2] === "even" && "2n" || match[2] === "odd" && "2n+1" ||
!/\D/.test( match[2] ) && "0n+" + match[2] || match[2]);
Function data
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
data: function( elem, name, data ) {
if ( !jQuery.acceptData( elem ) ) {
return;
}
Function dirCheck
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function dirCheck( dir, cur, doneName, checkSet, nodeCheck, isXML ) {
for ( var i = 0, l = checkSet.length; i < l; i++ ) {
var elem = checkSet[i];
if ( elem ) {
Function removeData
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
removeData: function( elem, name ) {
if ( !jQuery.acceptData( elem ) ) {
return;
}
Function each
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
each: function( object, callback, args ) {
var name, i = 0,
length = object.length,
isObj = length === undefined || jQuery.isFunction(object);
Function setOffset
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setOffset: function( elem, options, i ) {
var position = jQuery.css( elem, "position" );
// set position first, in-case top/left are set even on static elem
if ( position === "static" ) {
Function offset
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn.offset = function( options ) {
var elem = this[0], box;
if ( options ) {
return this.each(function( i ) {
Function ATTR
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ATTR: function( elem, match ) {
var name = match[1],
result = Expr.attrHandle[ name ] ?
Expr.attrHandle[ name ]( elem ) :
elem[ name ] != null ?
Function cleanData
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
cleanData: function( elems ) {
var data, id, cache = jQuery.cache,
special = jQuery.event.special,
deleteExpando = jQuery.support.deleteExpando;
Function addClass
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
addClass: function( value ) {
if ( jQuery.isFunction(value) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
var self = jQuery(this);
self.addClass( value.call(this, i, self.attr("class")) );
Function html
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
html: function( value ) {
if ( value === undefined ) {
return this[0] && this[0].nodeType === 1 ?
this[0].innerHTML.replace(rinlinejQuery, "") :
null;
Function >
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
">": function( checkSet, part ) {
var elem,
isPartStr = typeof part === "string",
i = 0,
l = checkSet.length;
Function type
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn[ type ] = function( size ) {
// Get window width or height
var elem = this[0];
if ( !elem ) {
return size == null ? null : this;
Function toggleClass
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
toggleClass: function( value, stateVal ) {
var type = typeof value,
isBool = typeof stateVal === "boolean";
if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( args.length === 1 && typeof args[0] === "string" && args[0].length < 512 && doc === document &&
!rnocache.test( args[0] ) && (jQuery.support.checkClone || !rchecked.test( args[0] )) ) {
cacheable = true;
cacheresults = jQuery.fragments[ args[0] ];
Function dirCheck
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function dirCheck( dir, cur, doneName, checkSet, nodeCheck, isXML ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if ( copy !== undefined ) {
target[ name ] = copy;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( option.selected && (jQuery.support.optDisabled ? !option.disabled : option.getAttribute("disabled") === null) &&
(!option.parentNode.disabled || !jQuery.nodeName( option.parentNode, "optgroup" )) ) {
// Get the specific value for the option
value = jQuery(option).val();
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !inplace ) {
curLoop = result;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !isXML ) {
elem.sizcache = doneName;
elem.sizset = i;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( copyIsArray ) {
copyIsArray = false;
clone = src && jQuery.isArray(src) ? src : [];
} else {
Function CLASS
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
CLASS: function( match, curLoop, inplace, result, not, isXML ) {
Function dirNodeCheck
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function dirNodeCheck( dir, cur, doneName, checkSet, nodeCheck, isXML ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( var c = 0, cl = classNames.length; c < cl; c++ ) {
if ( className.indexOf( " " + classNames[c] + " " ) < 0 ) {
setClass += " " + classNames[c];
}
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( ret === false ) {
event.preventDefault();
event.stopPropagation();
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( special[ type ] ) {
jQuery.event.remove( elem, type );
} else {
jQuery.removeEvent( elem, type, data.handle );
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( var c = 0, cl = classNames.length; c < cl; c++ ) {
className = className.replace(" " + classNames[c] + " ", " ");
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !match ) {
anyFound = found = true;
} else if ( match === true ) {
continue;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( typeof cur !== "string" ) {
if ( elem === cur ) {
match = true;
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( ret[r] === ret[n] ) {
ret.splice(n--, 1);
break;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( match.jquery ? match.index(cur) > -1 : jQuery(cur).is(match) ) {
ret.push({ selector: selector, elem: cur, level: level });
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( display === "inline" ) {
this.style.display = "inline-block";
} else {
this.style.display = "inline";
Function ATTR
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ATTR: function( match, curLoop, inplace, result, not, isXML ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( jQuery.nodeName( tbody[ j ], "tbody" ) && !tbody[ j ].childNodes.length ) {
tbody[ j ].parentNode.removeChild( tbody[ j ] );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( pos == null ) {
eventType.splice( j--, 1 );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( special.remove ) {
special.remove.call( elem, handleObj );
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( !anyFound ) {
return [];
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( jQuery.isPlainObject( context ) ) {
selector = [ document.createElement( ret[1] ) ];
jQuery.fn.attr.call( selector, context, true );
} else {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( var i = 0; (item = curLoop[i]) != null; i++ ) {
if ( item ) {
found = filter( item, match, i, curLoop );
var pass = not ^ !!found;
Function access
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
access: function( elems, key, value, exec, fn, pass ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( elem.id !== match[2] ) {
return rootjQuery.find( selector );
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( !seed && parts.length > 1 && context.nodeType === 9 && !contextXML &&
Expr.match.ID.test(parts[0]) && !Expr.match.ID.test(parts[parts.length - 1]) ) {
ret = Sizzle.find( parts.shift(), context, contextXML );
context = ret.expr ?
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( jQuery.expr && jQuery.expr.filters ) {
jQuery.expr.filters.hidden = function( elem ) {
var width = elem.offsetWidth,
height = elem.offsetHeight;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( (!special._default || special._default.call( elem, event ) === false) &&
!isClick && !(target && target.nodeName && jQuery.noData[target.nodeName.toLowerCase()]) ) {
try {
if ( target[ targetType ] ) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
} else if ( typeof value === "string" && !rnocache.test( value ) &&
(jQuery.support.leadingWhitespace || !rleadingWhitespace.test( value )) &&
!wrapMap[ (rtagName.exec( value ) || ["", ""])[1].toLowerCase() ] ) {
value = value.replace(rxhtmlTag, "<$1></$2>");
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( (e.keyCode === 13 && elem.nodeName.toLowerCase() !== "textarea") ||
(e.keyCode === 32 && (type === "checkbox" || type === "radio")) ||
type === "select-multiple" ) {
return testChange.call( this, e );
}
Function PSEUDO
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
PSEUDO: function( match, curLoop, inplace, result, not ) {
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return jQuery.makeArray( selector, this );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return undefined;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return elem[ name ];
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return siblingCheck( ap[i], bp[i] );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return jQuery.merge( this, selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return { top: top, left: left };
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return attr === null ? undefined : attr;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return jQuery.isNaN( ret ) ? orig : ret;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return elem.getAttribute("value") === null ? "on" : elem.value;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return i === al ?
siblingCheck( a, bp[i], -1 ) :
siblingCheck( ap[i], b, 1 );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return diff === 0;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return (context || rootjQuery).find( selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return (elem.value || "").replace(rreturn, "");
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ( diff % first === 0 && diff / first >= 0 );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return undefined;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.css( type, typeof size === "string" ? size : size + "px" );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return rootjQuery.find( selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return jQuery( context ).find( selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return rootjQuery.ready( selector );
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return elem.style.cssText;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.each(function(i) {
var self = jQuery(this), val = value;
if ( this.nodeType !== 1 ) {
return;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"": function(checkSet, part, isXML){
var nodeCheck,
doneName = done++,
checkFn = dirCheck;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"~": function( checkSet, part, isXML ) {
var nodeCheck,
doneName = done++,
checkFn = dirCheck;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction(value) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
var self = jQuery(this);
self.removeClass( value.call(this, i, self.attr("class")) );
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction(value) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
var self = jQuery(this);
self.addClass( value.call(this, i, self.attr("class")) );
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction(text) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
var self = jQuery( this );
self.text( text.call(this, i, self.text()) );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
event.pageY = event.clientY + (doc && doc.scrollTop || body && body.scrollTop || 0) - (doc && doc.clientTop || body && body.clientTop || 0);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( size ) ) {
return this.each(function( i ) {
var self = jQuery( this );
self[ type ]( size.call( this, i, self[ type ]() ) );
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
event.pageX = event.clientX + (doc && doc.scrollLeft || body && body.scrollLeft || 0) - (doc && doc.clientLeft || body && body.clientLeft || 0);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( html ) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
jQuery(this).wrapInner( html.call(this, i) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( jQuery.isFunction( html ) ) {
return this.each(function(i) {
jQuery(this).wrapAll( html.call(this, i) );
});
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76