Showing 26 of 28 total issues
Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return[:type7, value.delete($1 + "."), "", $1, "."]Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return[:type6, value.delete("(" + $1 + ")"), "(", $1, ")"]Method optsjason has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.optsjason opt, config, args
config[:output][:jason] = false
opt.on( '-j', '--to-json', 'Parse the Legal Markdown file and produce a JSON document.' ) do
config[:output][:jason] = true- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_the_parsers has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_the_parsers
if @content[/\{\{/] && @headers
self.extend LegalToMarkdown::Mixins
@mixins = true
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method romans_setup has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def romans_setup( array_to_sub )
if @r_l || @r_u
array_to_sub[3] = RomanNumerals.to_roman_upper(array_to_sub[3]) if @r_u
array_to_sub[3] = RomanNumerals.to_roman_lower(array_to_sub[3]) if @r_l
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_selector_above has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_selector_above( selector )
if @deep_leaders
selector_above = "l" + (selector[1].to_i-1).to_s + "."
selector_above = "l1." if selector_above == "l0."
else- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"