Showing 366 of 552 total issues
Function start_
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.start_ = function() {
var data = this.file_;
// Functions can return references of all other types.
if (typeof data == 'function') {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function hslToRgb
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
hslToRgb(h, s, l) {
let r; let g; let b;
if (s === 0) {
r = g = b = l; // achromatic
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function refresh
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
let refresh = debounce(() => {
if (isBuilding) {
log('Watcher: A build is already in progress, deferring change detection...');
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createDragInterface_
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.createDragInterface_ = function() {
var context = {
// Tracks whether the mouse is down right now
isZooming: false,
isPanning: false, // is this drag part of a pan?
Function footnoteTail
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function footnoteTail(state) {
let i; let l; let j; let t; let lastParagraph; let list; let token; let tokens; let current; let currentLabel;
let insideRef = false;
let refTokens = {};
Function binarySearch
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.binarySearch = function(val, arry, abs, low, high) {
if (low === null || low === undefined ||
high === null || high === undefined) {
low = 0;
high = arry.length - 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getScript
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getScript(source, callback) {
//check whether the script is not already there
if (Array.from(document.getElementsByTagName('script')).filter(x=> x.getAttribute('src') === source).length > 0) {
console.warn('AnimateAdobe.getScript() WARNING, script is already added into DOM:', source);
//do callback?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getScript
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getScript(source, callback) {
//check whether the script is not already there
if (Array.from(document.getElementsByTagName('script')).filter(x=> x.getAttribute('src') === source).length > 0) {
console.warn('AnimateAdobe.getScript() WARNING, script is already added into DOM:', source);
//do callback?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function doUnzoom_
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.doUnzoom_ = function() {
var dirty = false, dirtyX = false, dirtyY = false;
if (this.dateWindow_ !== null) {
dirty = true;
dirtyX = true;
Function step
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
step(e) {
//this = window.thisfmi;
//primitive semaphore, only one instance can perform this call
if (!this.doingstep) {
//console.log('fmu step()');
Function configure
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function configure(config) {
config.globalResources([
PLATFORM.moduleName('./elements/checkbox'),
PLATFORM.moduleName('./elements/buttonparams'),
PLATFORM.moduleName('./elements/receptacle.html'),
Function updateSelection_
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.updateSelection_ = function(opt_animFraction) {
var defaultPrevented = this.cascadeEvents_('select', {
selectedX: this.lastx_,
selectedPoints: this.selPoints_
});
Function instantiate
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
instantiate() {
console.log('fmi instantiate()');
//first define FMI API function names;
const sReset = 'fmi2Reset';
const sInstantiate = 'fmi2Instantiate';
Function footnoteDef
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function footnoteDef(state, startLine, endLine, silent) {
let oldBMark; let oldTShift; let oldSCount; let oldParentType; let pos; let label; let token;
let initial; let offset; let ch; let posAfterColon;
let start = state.bMarks[startLine] + state.tShift[startLine];
let max = state.eMarks[startLine];
Function moveTouch
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Interaction.moveTouch = function(event, g, context) {
var i, touches = [];
for (i = 0; i < event.touches.length; i++) {
var t = event.touches[i];
touches.push({
Function bind
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
bind() {
super.bind();
let datasets = [];
let mydata1 = this.initialdata.split(';');
//initialize x and y, x is first dataset, y is al the rest
Function strftime
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Date.ext={};Date.ext.util={};Date.ext.util.xPad=function(x,pad,r){if(typeof (r)=="undefined"){r=10}for(;parseInt(x,10)<r&&r>1;r/=10){x=pad.toString()+x}return x.toString()};Date.prototype.locale="en-GB";if(document.getElementsByTagName("html")&&document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0].lang){Date.prototype.locale=document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0].lang}Date.ext.locales={};Date.ext.locales.en={a:["Sun","Mon","Tue","Wed","Thu","Fri","Sat"],A:["Sunday","Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday"],b:["Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec"],B:["January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"],c:"%a %d %b %Y %T %Z",p:["AM","PM"],P:["am","pm"],x:"%d/%m/%y",X:"%T"};Date.ext.locales["en-US"]=Date.ext.locales.en;Date.ext.locales["en-US"].c="%a %d %b %Y %r %Z";Date.ext.locales["en-US"].x="%D";Date.ext.locales["en-US"].X="%r";Date.ext.locales["en-GB"]=Date.ext.locales.en;Date.ext.locales["en-AU"]=Date.ext.locales["en-GB"];Date.ext.formats={a:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].a[d.getDay()]},A:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].A[d.getDay()]},b:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].b[d.getMonth()]},B:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].B[d.getMonth()]},c:"toLocaleString",C:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(d.getFullYear()/100,10),0)},d:["getDate","0"],e:["getDate"," "],g:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(Date.ext.util.G(d)/100,10),0)},G:function(d){var y=d.getFullYear();var V=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.V(d),10);var W=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.W(d),10);if(W>V){y++}else{if(W===0&&V>=52){y--}}return y},H:["getHours","0"],I:function(d){var I=d.getHours()%12;return Date.ext.util.xPad(I===0?12:I,0)},j:function(d){var ms=d-new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/1/1 GMT");ms+=d.getTimezoneOffset()*60000;var doy=parseInt(ms/60000/60/24,10)+1;return Date.ext.util.xPad(doy,0,100)},m:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d.getMonth()+1,0)},M:["getMinutes","0"],p:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].p[d.getHours()>=12?1:0]},P:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].P[d.getHours()>=12?1:0]},S:["getSeconds","0"],u:function(d){var dow=d.getDay();return dow===0?7:dow},U:function(d){var doy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.j(d),10);var rdow=6-d.getDay();var woy=parseInt((doy+rdow)/7,10);return Date.ext.util.xPad(woy,0)},V:function(d){var woy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.W(d),10);var dow1_1=(new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/1/1")).getDay();var idow=woy+(dow1_1>4||dow1_1<=1?0:1);if(idow==53&&(new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/12/31")).getDay()<4){idow=1}else{if(idow===0){idow=Date.ext.formats.V(new Date(""+(d.getFullYear()-1)+"/12/31"))}}return Date.ext.util.xPad(idow,0)},w:"getDay",W:function(d){var doy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.j(d),10);var rdow=7-Date.ext.formats.u(d);var woy=parseInt((doy+rdow)/7,10);return Date.ext.util.xPad(woy,0,10)},y:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d.getFullYear()%100,0)},Y:"getFullYear",z:function(d){var o=d.getTimezoneOffset();var H=Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(Math.abs(o/60),10),0);var M=Date.ext.util.xPad(o%60,0);return(o>0?"-":"+")+H+M},Z:function(d){return d.toString().replace(/^.*\(([^)]+)\)$/,"$1")},"%":function(d){return"%"}};Date.ext.aggregates={c:"locale",D:"%m/%d/%y",h:"%b",n:"\n",r:"%I:%M:%S %p",R:"%H:%M",t:"\t",T:"%H:%M:%S",x:"locale",X:"locale"};Date.ext.aggregates.z=Date.ext.formats.z(new Date());Date.ext.aggregates.Z=Date.ext.formats.Z(new Date());Date.ext.unsupported={};Date.prototype.strftime=function(fmt){if(!(this.locale in Date.ext.locales)){if(this.locale.replace(/-[a-zA-Z]+$/,"") in Date.ext.locales){this.locale=this.locale.replace(/-[a-zA-Z]+$/,"")}else{this.locale="en-GB"}}var d=this;while(fmt.match(/%[cDhnrRtTxXzZ]/)){fmt=fmt.replace(/%([cDhnrRtTxXzZ])/g,function(m0,m1){var f=Date.ext.aggregates[m1];return(f=="locale"?Date.ext.locales[d.locale][m1]:f)})}var str=fmt.replace(/%([aAbBCdegGHIjmMpPSuUVwWyY%])/g,function(m0,m1){var f=Date.ext.formats[m1];if(typeof (f)=="string"){return d[f]()}else{if(typeof (f)=="function"){return f.call(d,d)}else{if(typeof (f)=="object"&&typeof (f[0])=="string"){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d[f[0]](),f[1])}else{return m1}}}});d=null;return str};
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function discoverChildren
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
discoverChildren(root, prefix, suffix) {
let discovered = [];
//console.log('discovering', prefix);
if (root.children) {
//depth first
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function convertf2a
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
convertf2a(x) {
//do conversion if operation is defined
if (this.operation) x = this.operation(x);
if (this.autofmin) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function valueChanged
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
valueChanged(newValue, oldValue) {
//if (oldValue !== newValue)
if (this.ids) {
//semaphore only one change in time is allowed
if (!window.rangebinding) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"