File dygraph.js has 5651 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*! @license Copyright 2011 Dan Vanderkam (danvdk@gmail.com) MIT-licensed (http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT) */
/**
* @license
* Copyright 2011 Dan Vanderkam (danvdk@gmail.com)
* MIT-licensed (http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)Function _renderLineChart has a Cognitive Complexity of 121 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._renderLineChart = function() {
// TODO(danvk): use this.attr_ for many of these.
var ctx = this.elementContext;
var fillAlpha = this.attr_('fillAlpha');
var errorBars = this.attr_("errorBars") || this.attr_("customBars");- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function rollingAverage has a Cognitive Complexity of 95 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.rollingAverage = function(originalData, rollPeriod) {
if (originalData.length < 2)
return originalData;
rollPeriod = Math.min(rollPeriod, originalData.length);
var rollingData = [];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function numericTicks has a Cognitive Complexity of 92 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.numericTicks = function (a, b, pixels, opts, dygraph, vals) {
//console.log("nt a " + a + " b " + b + " vals " + vals);
var pixels_per_tick = opts('pixelsPerLabel');
var ticks = [];
var i, j, tickV, nTicks;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Legend has a Cognitive Complexity of 92 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Plugins.Legend = (function() {
/*
Current bits of jankiness:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function gatherDatasets_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 84 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.gatherDatasets_ = function(rolledSeries, dateWindow) {
var boundaryIds = [];
var cumulative_y = []; // For stacked series.
var datasets = [];
var extremes = {}; // series name -> [low, high]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _renderAxis has a Cognitive Complexity of 73 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._renderAxis = function() {
if (!this.attr_('drawXAxis') && !this.attr_('drawYAxis')) return;
// Round pixels to half-integer boundaries for crisper drawing.
function halfUp(x) { return Math.round(x) + 0.5; }- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function computeYAxisRanges_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 71 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.computeYAxisRanges_ = function (extremes) {
// Build a map from axis number -> [list of series names]
var seriesForAxis = [], series;
for (series in this.seriesToAxisMap_) {
if (!this.seriesToAxisMap_.hasOwnProperty(series)) continue;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function computeCombinedSeriesAndLimits_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 65 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphRangeSelector.prototype.computeCombinedSeriesAndLimits_ = function() {
var data = this.dygraph_.rawData_;
var logscale = this.attr_('logscale');
// Create a combined series (average of all series values).- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseCSV_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 64 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.parseCSV_ = function(data) {
var ret = [];
var lines = data.split("\n");
var vals, j;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseDataTable_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 61 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.parseDataTable_ = function(data) {
var shortTextForAnnotationNum = function(num) {
// converts [0-9]+ [A-Z][a-z]*
// example: 0=A, 1=B, 25=Z, 26=Aa, 27=Ab
// and continues like.. Ba Bb .. Za .. Zz..Aaa...Zzz Aaaa Zzzz- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function initInteraction_ has 227 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphRangeSelector.prototype.initInteraction_ = function() {
var self = this;
var topElem = this.isIE_ ? document : window;
var xLast = 0;
var handle = null;Function RGBColor has 218 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function RGBColor(color_string)
{
this.ok = false;
// strip any leading #Function Legend has 181 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Plugins.Legend = (function() {
/*
Current bits of jankiness:Function _renderLineChart has 162 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._renderLineChart = function() {
// TODO(danvk): use this.attr_ for many of these.
var ctx = this.elementContext;
var fillAlpha = this.attr_('fillAlpha');
var errorBars = this.attr_("errorBars") || this.attr_("customBars");Function computeYAxes_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.computeYAxes_ = function() {
// Preserve valueWindow settings if they exist, and if the user hasn't
// specified a new valueRange.
var i, valueWindows, seriesName, axis, index, opts, v;
if (this.axes_ !== undefined && this.user_attrs_.hasOwnProperty("valueRange") === false) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _drawSeries has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._drawSeries = function(
ctx, iter, strokeWidth, pointSize, drawPoints, drawGapPoints,
stepPlot, strategy) {
var prevCanvasX = null;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getDateAxis has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.getDateAxis = function(start_time, end_time, granularity, opts, dg) {
var formatter = opts("axisLabelFormatter");
var ticks = [];
var t;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _renderAxis has 135 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._renderAxis = function() {
if (!this.attr_('drawXAxis') && !this.attr_('drawYAxis')) return;
// Round pixels to half-integer boundaries for crisper drawing.
function halfUp(x) { return Math.round(x) + 0.5; }Function numericTicks has 123 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.numericTicks = function (a, b, pixels, opts, dygraph, vals) {
//console.log("nt a " + a + " b " + b + " vals " + vals);
var pixels_per_tick = opts('pixelsPerLabel');
var ticks = [];
var i, j, tickV, nTicks;Function _renderAnnotations has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._renderAnnotations = function() {
var annotationStyle = {
"position": "absolute",
"fontSize": this.attr_('axisLabelFontSize') + "px",
"zIndex": 10,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function rollingAverage has 115 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.rollingAverage = function(originalData, rollPeriod) {
if (originalData.length < 2)
return originalData;
rollPeriod = Math.min(rollPeriod, originalData.length);
var rollingData = [];Function extremeValues_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.extremeValues_ = function(series) {
var minY = null, maxY = null, j, y;
var bars = this.attr_("errorBars") || this.attr_("customBars");
if (bars) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseDataTable_ has 109 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.parseDataTable_ = function(data) {
var shortTextForAnnotationNum = function(num) {
// converts [0-9]+ [A-Z][a-z]*
// example: 0=A, 1=B, 25=Z, 26=Aa, 27=Ab
// and continues like.. Ba Bb .. Za .. Zz..Aaa...Zzz Aaaa ZzzzFunction parseCSV_ has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.parseCSV_ = function(data) {
var ret = [];
var lines = data.split("\n");
var vals, j;
Function doUnzoom_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.doUnzoom_ = function() {
var dirty = false, dirtyX = false, dirtyY = false;
if (this.dateWindow_ !== null) {
dirty = true;
dirtyX = true;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _evaluateLimits has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype._evaluateLimits = function () {
//TODO(tomaton): fix xrange when last x value is not the highest in case of x = sin(y) x is from 0 to 1 and back to 0
//and range for x is 0 to 1
this.minxval = this.maxxval = null;
if (this.dateWindow_) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function isPixelChangingOptionList has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.isPixelChangingOptionList = function(labels, attrs) {
// A whitelist of options that do not change pixel positions.
var pixelSafeOptions = {
'annotationClickHandler': true,
'annotationDblClickHandler': true,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function computeCombinedSeriesAndLimits_ has 96 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphRangeSelector.prototype.computeCombinedSeriesAndLimits_ = function() {
var data = this.dygraph_.rawData_;
var logscale = this.attr_('logscale');
// Create a combined series (average of all series values).Function _renderChartLabels has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._renderChartLabels = function() {
var div, class_div;
// Generate divs for the chart title, xlabel and ylabel.
// Space for these divs has already been taken away from the charting area inFunction updateSelection_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.updateSelection_ = function(opt_animFraction) {
var defaultPrevented = this.cascadeEvents_('select', {
selectedX: this.lastx_,
selectedPoints: this.selPoints_
});- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setSelection has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.setSelection = function(row, opt_seriesName) {
// Extract the points we've selected
this.selPoints_ = [];
var pos = 0;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.__init__ = function (div, file, attrs) {
// Hack for IE: if we're using excanvas and the document hasn't finished
// loading yet (and hence may not have initialized whatever it needs to
// initialize), then keep calling this routine periodically until it has.
if (/MSIE/.test(navigator.userAgent) && !window.opera &&- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function findStackedPoint has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.findStackedPoint = function(domX, domY) {
var row = this.findClosestRow(domX);
var boundary = this.getLeftBoundary_();
var rowIdx = row - boundary;
var points = this.layout_.points;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function gatherDatasets_ has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.gatherDatasets_ = function(rolledSeries, dateWindow) {
var boundaryIds = [];
var cumulative_y = []; // For stacked series.
var datasets = [];
var extremes = {}; // series name -> [low, high]Function _renderAnnotations has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._renderAnnotations = function() {
var annotationStyle = {
"position": "absolute",
"fontSize": this.attr_('axisLabelFontSize') + "px",
"zIndex": 10,Function __init__ has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.__init__ = function (div, file, attrs) {
// Hack for IE: if we're using excanvas and the document hasn't finished
// loading yet (and hence may not have initialized whatever it needs to
// initialize), then keep calling this routine periodically until it has.
if (/MSIE/.test(navigator.userAgent) && !window.opera &&Function movePan has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Interaction.movePan = function(event, g, context) {
context.dragEndX = g.dragGetX_(event, context);
context.dragEndY = g.dragGetY_(event, context);
var minDate = context.initialLeftmostDate -- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function computeYAxisRanges_ has 80 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.computeYAxisRanges_ = function (extremes) {
// Build a map from axis number -> [list of series names]
var seriesForAxis = [], series;
for (series in this.seriesToAxisMap_) {
if (!this.seriesToAxisMap_.hasOwnProperty(series)) continue;Function isPixelChangingOptionList has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.isPixelChangingOptionList = function(labels, attrs) {
// A whitelist of options that do not change pixel positions.
var pixelSafeOptions = {
'annotationClickHandler': true,
'annotationDblClickHandler': true,Function computeYAxes_ has 78 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.computeYAxes_ = function() {
// Preserve valueWindow settings if they exist, and if the user hasn't
// specified a new valueRange.
var i, valueWindows, seriesName, axis, index, opts, v;
if (this.axes_ !== undefined && this.user_attrs_.hasOwnProperty("valueRange") === false) {Function updateDeep has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.updateDeep = function (self, o) {
// Taken from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/384286/javascript-isdom-how-do-you-check-if-a-javascript-object-is-a-dom-object
function isNode(o) {
return (
typeof Node === "object" ? o instanceof Node :- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function RGBColor has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function RGBColor(color_string)
{
this.ok = false;
// strip any leading #- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getDateAxis has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.getDateAxis = function(start_time, end_time, granularity, opts, dg) {
var formatter = opts("axisLabelFormatter");
var ticks = [];
var t;
Function start_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.start_ = function() {
var data = this.file_;
// Functions can return references of all other types.
if (typeof data == 'function') {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createDragInterface_ has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.createDragInterface_ = function() {
var context = {
// Tracks whether the mouse is down right now
isZooming: false,
isPanning: false, // is this drag part of a pan?Function binarySearch has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.binarySearch = function(val, arry, abs, low, high) {
if (low === null || low === undefined ||
high === null || high === undefined) {
low = 0;
high = arry.length - 1;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function doUnzoom_ has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.doUnzoom_ = function() {
var dirty = false, dirtyX = false, dirtyY = false;
if (this.dateWindow_ !== null) {
dirty = true;
dirtyX = true;Function updateSelection_ has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.updateSelection_ = function(opt_animFraction) {
var defaultPrevented = this.cascadeEvents_('select', {
selectedX: this.lastx_,
selectedPoints: this.selPoints_
});Function moveTouch has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Interaction.moveTouch = function(event, g, context) {
var i, touches = [];
for (i = 0; i < event.touches.length; i++) {
var t = event.touches[i];
touches.push({Function strftime has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Date.ext={};Date.ext.util={};Date.ext.util.xPad=function(x,pad,r){if(typeof (r)=="undefined"){r=10}for(;parseInt(x,10)<r&&r>1;r/=10){x=pad.toString()+x}return x.toString()};Date.prototype.locale="en-GB";if(document.getElementsByTagName("html")&&document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0].lang){Date.prototype.locale=document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0].lang}Date.ext.locales={};Date.ext.locales.en={a:["Sun","Mon","Tue","Wed","Thu","Fri","Sat"],A:["Sunday","Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday"],b:["Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec"],B:["January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"],c:"%a %d %b %Y %T %Z",p:["AM","PM"],P:["am","pm"],x:"%d/%m/%y",X:"%T"};Date.ext.locales["en-US"]=Date.ext.locales.en;Date.ext.locales["en-US"].c="%a %d %b %Y %r %Z";Date.ext.locales["en-US"].x="%D";Date.ext.locales["en-US"].X="%r";Date.ext.locales["en-GB"]=Date.ext.locales.en;Date.ext.locales["en-AU"]=Date.ext.locales["en-GB"];Date.ext.formats={a:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].a[d.getDay()]},A:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].A[d.getDay()]},b:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].b[d.getMonth()]},B:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].B[d.getMonth()]},c:"toLocaleString",C:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(d.getFullYear()/100,10),0)},d:["getDate","0"],e:["getDate"," "],g:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(Date.ext.util.G(d)/100,10),0)},G:function(d){var y=d.getFullYear();var V=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.V(d),10);var W=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.W(d),10);if(W>V){y++}else{if(W===0&&V>=52){y--}}return y},H:["getHours","0"],I:function(d){var I=d.getHours()%12;return Date.ext.util.xPad(I===0?12:I,0)},j:function(d){var ms=d-new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/1/1 GMT");ms+=d.getTimezoneOffset()*60000;var doy=parseInt(ms/60000/60/24,10)+1;return Date.ext.util.xPad(doy,0,100)},m:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d.getMonth()+1,0)},M:["getMinutes","0"],p:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].p[d.getHours()>=12?1:0]},P:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].P[d.getHours()>=12?1:0]},S:["getSeconds","0"],u:function(d){var dow=d.getDay();return dow===0?7:dow},U:function(d){var doy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.j(d),10);var rdow=6-d.getDay();var woy=parseInt((doy+rdow)/7,10);return Date.ext.util.xPad(woy,0)},V:function(d){var woy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.W(d),10);var dow1_1=(new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/1/1")).getDay();var idow=woy+(dow1_1>4||dow1_1<=1?0:1);if(idow==53&&(new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/12/31")).getDay()<4){idow=1}else{if(idow===0){idow=Date.ext.formats.V(new Date(""+(d.getFullYear()-1)+"/12/31"))}}return Date.ext.util.xPad(idow,0)},w:"getDay",W:function(d){var doy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.j(d),10);var rdow=7-Date.ext.formats.u(d);var woy=parseInt((doy+rdow)/7,10);return Date.ext.util.xPad(woy,0,10)},y:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d.getFullYear()%100,0)},Y:"getFullYear",z:function(d){var o=d.getTimezoneOffset();var H=Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(Math.abs(o/60),10),0);var M=Date.ext.util.xPad(o%60,0);return(o>0?"-":"+")+H+M},Z:function(d){return d.toString().replace(/^.*\(([^)]+)\)$/,"$1")},"%":function(d){return"%"}};Date.ext.aggregates={c:"locale",D:"%m/%d/%y",h:"%b",n:"\n",r:"%I:%M:%S %p",R:"%H:%M",t:"\t",T:"%H:%M:%S",x:"locale",X:"locale"};Date.ext.aggregates.z=Date.ext.formats.z(new Date());Date.ext.aggregates.Z=Date.ext.formats.Z(new Date());Date.ext.unsupported={};Date.prototype.strftime=function(fmt){if(!(this.locale in Date.ext.locales)){if(this.locale.replace(/-[a-zA-Z]+$/,"") in Date.ext.locales){this.locale=this.locale.replace(/-[a-zA-Z]+$/,"")}else{this.locale="en-GB"}}var d=this;while(fmt.match(/%[cDhnrRtTxXzZ]/)){fmt=fmt.replace(/%([cDhnrRtTxXzZ])/g,function(m0,m1){var f=Date.ext.aggregates[m1];return(f=="locale"?Date.ext.locales[d.locale][m1]:f)})}var str=fmt.replace(/%([aAbBCdegGHIjmMpPSuUVwWyY%])/g,function(m0,m1){var f=Date.ext.formats[m1];if(typeof (f)=="string"){return d[f]()}else{if(typeof (f)=="function"){return f.call(d,d)}else{if(typeof (f)=="object"&&typeof (f[0])=="string"){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d[f[0]](),f[1])}else{return m1}}}});d=null;return str};- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _createIEClipArea has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._createIEClipArea = function() {
var className = 'dygraph-clip-div';
var graphDiv = this.dygraph_.graphDiv;
// Remove old clip divs.Function updateOptions has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.updateOptions = function(input_attrs, block_redraw) {
if (typeof(block_redraw) == 'undefined') block_redraw = false;
// mapLegacyOptions_ drops the "file" parameter as a convenience to us.
var file = input_attrs.file;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseArray_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.parseArray_ = function(data) {
// Peek at the first x value to see if it's numeric.
if (data.length === 0) {
this.error("Can't plot empty data set");
return null;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _drawSeries has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._drawSeries = function(
ctx, iter, strokeWidth, pointSize, drawPoints, drawGapPoints,
stepPlot, strategy) {
var prevCanvasX = null;Function generateLegendHTML has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var generateLegendHTML = function(g, x, sel_points, oneEmWidth) {
// TODO(danvk): deprecate this option in place of {legend: 'never'}
if (g.getOption('showLabelsOnHighlight') !== true) return '';
// If no points are selected, we display a default legend. Traditionally,Function _renderChartLabels has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._renderChartLabels = function() {
var div, class_div;
// Generate divs for the chart title, xlabel and ylabel.
// Space for these divs has already been taken away from the charting area in- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function clear has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype.clear = function() {
var context;
if (this.isIE) {
// VML takes a while to start up, so we just poll every this.IEDelay
try {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setColors_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.setColors_ = function() {
var num = this.attr_("labels").length - 1;
this.colors_ = [];
var colors = this.attr_('colors');
var i;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createRotatedDiv has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createRotatedDiv(axis, classes, html) {
var box = {
left: 0,
top: that.area.y,
width: that.attr_('yLabelWidth'),Function startPan has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Interaction.startPan = function(event, g, context) {
var i, axis;
context.isPanning = true;
var xRange = g.xAxisRange();
context.dateRange = xRange[1] - xRange[0];Function render has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype.render = function() {
// Draw the new X/Y grid. Lines appear crisper when pixels are rounded to
// half-integers. This prevents them from drawing in two rows/cols.
var ctx = this.elementContext;
function halfUp(x) { return Math.round(x) + 0.5; }Function generateLegendDashHTML has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var generateLegendDashHTML = function(strokePattern, color, oneEmWidth) {
// IE 7,8 fail at these divs, so they get boring legend, have not tested 9.
var isIE = (/MSIE/.test(navigator.userAgent) && !window.opera);
if (isIE) return "—";
Function activate has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
legend.prototype.activate = function(g) {
var div;
var divWidth = g.getOption('labelsDivWidth');
var userLabelsDiv = g.getOption('labelsDiv');Function movePan has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Interaction.movePan = function(event, g, context) {
context.dragEndX = g.dragGetX_(event, context);
context.dragEndY = g.dragGetY_(event, context);
var minDate = context.initialLeftmostDate -Function parseArray_ has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.parseArray_ = function(data) {
// Peek at the first x value to see if it's numeric.
if (data.length === 0) {
this.error("Can't plot empty data set");
return null;Function findStackedPoint has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.findStackedPoint = function(domX, domY) {
var row = this.findClosestRow(domX);
var boundary = this.getLeftBoundary_();
var rowIdx = row - boundary;
var points = this.layout_.points;Function _dashedLine has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._dashedLine = function(ctx, x, y, x2, y2, pattern) {
// Original version http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4576724/dotted-stroke-in-canvas
// Modified by Russell Valentine to keep line history and continue the pattern
// where it left off.
var dx, dy, len, rot, patternIndex, segment;Function createDragInterface_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.createDragInterface_ = function() {
var context = {
// Tracks whether the mouse is down right now
isZooming: false,
isPanning: false, // is this drag part of a pan?- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function moveTouch has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Interaction.moveTouch = function(event, g, context) {
var i, touches = [];
for (i = 0; i < event.touches.length; i++) {
var t = event.touches[i];
touches.push({- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function drawMiniPlot_ has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphRangeSelector.prototype.drawMiniPlot_ = function() {
var fillStyle = this.attr_('rangeSelectorPlotFillColor');
var strokeStyle = this.attr_('rangeSelectorPlotStrokeColor');
if (!fillStyle && !strokeStyle) {
return;Function createInterface_ has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.createInterface_ = function() {
// Create the all-enclosing graph div
var enclosing = this.maindiv_;
this.graphDiv = document.createElement("div");Function binarySearch has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.binarySearch = function(val, arry, abs, low, high) {
if (low === null || low === undefined ||
high === null || high === undefined) {
low = 0;
high = arry.length - 1;Function drawInteractiveLayer_ has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphRangeSelector.prototype.drawInteractiveLayer_ = function() {
var ctx = this.fgcanvas_ctx_;
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, this.canvasRect_.w, this.canvasRect_.h);
var margin = 1;
var width = this.canvasRect_.w - margin;Function computePlotArea_ has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype.computePlotArea_ = function() {
var area = {
// TODO(danvk): per-axis setting.
x: 0,
y: 0Function setSelection has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.setSelection = function(row, opt_seriesName) {
// Extract the points we've selected
this.selPoints_ = [];
var pos = 0;
Function startTouch has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Interaction.startTouch = function(event, g, context) {
event.preventDefault(); // touch browsers are all nice.
var touches = [];
for (var i = 0; i < event.touches.length; i++) {
var t = event.touches[i];Function drawGraph_ has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.drawGraph_ = function() {
var start = new Date();
// This is used to set the second parameter to drawCallback, below.
var is_initial_draw = this.is_initial_draw_;Function dateParser has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.dateParser = function(dateStr) {
var dateStrSlashed;
var d;
// Let the system try the format first, with one caveat:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function computePlotArea_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype.computePlotArea_ = function() {
var area = {
// TODO(danvk): per-axis setting.
x: 0,
y: 0- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function addAnnotationRule has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.addAnnotationRule = function() {
if (Dygraph.addedAnnotationCSS) return;
var rule = "border: 1px solid black; " +
"background-color: white; " +- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function numDateTicks has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.numDateTicks = function(start_time, end_time, granularity) {
if (granularity < Dygraph.MONTHLY) {
// Generate one tick mark for every fixed interval of time.
var spacing = Dygraph.SHORT_SPACINGS[granularity];
return Math.floor(0.5 + 1.0 * (end_time - start_time) / spacing);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _dashedLine has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._dashedLine = function(ctx, x, y, x2, y2, pattern) {
// Original version http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4576724/dotted-stroke-in-canvas
// Modified by Russell Valentine to keep line history and continue the pattern
// where it left off.
var dx, dy, len, rot, patternIndex, segment;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function attr_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.attr_ = function(name, seriesName) {
var sources = [];
sources.push(this.attrs_);
if (this.user_attrs_) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function doAnimatedZoom has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.doAnimatedZoom = function(oldXRange, newXRange, oldYRanges, newYRanges, callback) {
var steps = this.attr_("animatedZooms") ? Dygraph.ANIMATION_STEPS : 1;
var windows = [];
var valueRanges = [];Function _evaluateLineCharts has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype._evaluateLineCharts = function() {
// An array to keep track of how many points will be drawn for each set.
// This will allow for the canvas renderer to not have to check every point
// for every data set since the points are added in order of the sets in
// datasets.Function log has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.log = function(severity, message) {
var st;
if (typeof(printStackTrace) != 'undefined') {
// Remove uninteresting bits: logging functions and paths.
st = printStackTrace({guess:false});Function clear has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype.clear = function() {
var context;
if (this.isIE) {
// VML takes a while to start up, so we just poll every this.IEDelay
try {Function _evaluateLimits has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype._evaluateLimits = function () {
//TODO(tomaton): fix xrange when last x value is not the highest in case of x = sin(y) x is from 0 to 1 and back to 0
//and range for x is 0 to 1
this.minxval = this.maxxval = null;
if (this.dateWindow_) {Function treatMouseOpAsClick has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Interaction.treatMouseOpAsClick = function(g, event, context) {
var clickCallback = g.attr_('clickCallback');
var pointClickCallback = g.attr_('pointClickCallback');
var selectedPoint = null;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mapLegacyOptions_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.mapLegacyOptions_ = function(attrs) {
var my_attrs = {};
for (var k in attrs) {
if (k == 'file') continue;
if (attrs.hasOwnProperty(k)) my_attrs[k] = attrs[k];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mouseMove_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.mouseMove_ = function(event) {
// This prevents JS errors when mousing over the canvas before data loads.
var points = this.layout_.points;
if (points === undefined) return;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function start_ has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.start_ = function() {
var data = this.file_;
// Functions can return references of all other types.
if (typeof data == 'function') {Function mouseMove_ has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.mouseMove_ = function(event) {
// This prevents JS errors when mousing over the canvas before data loads.
var points = this.layout_.points;
if (points === undefined) return;
Function resize has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.resize = function(width, height) {
if (this.resize_lock) {
return;
}
this.resize_lock = true;Function extremeValues_ has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.extremeValues_ = function(series) {
var minY = null, maxY = null, j, y;
var bars = this.attr_("errorBars") || this.attr_("customBars");
if (bars) {Function DygraphCanvasRenderer has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var DygraphCanvasRenderer = function(dygraph, element, elementContext, layout) {
this.dygraph_ = dygraph;
this.layout = layout;
this.element = element;Function updateOptions has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.updateOptions = function(input_attrs, block_redraw) {
if (typeof(block_redraw) == 'undefined') block_redraw = false;
// mapLegacyOptions_ drops the "file" parameter as a convenience to us.
var file = input_attrs.file;Function _drawStyledLine has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ctx, i, setName, color, strokeWidth, strokePattern, drawPoints,
drawPointCallback, pointSize) {Function _createIEClipArea has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._createIEClipArea = function() {
var className = 'dygraph-clip-div';
var graphDiv = this.dygraph_.graphDiv;
// Remove old clip divs.- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function doAnimatedZoom has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.doAnimatedZoom = function(oldXRange, newXRange, oldYRanges, newYRanges, callback) {
var steps = this.attr_("animatedZooms") ? Dygraph.ANIMATION_STEPS : 1;
var windows = [];
var valueRanges = [];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function drawZoomRect_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.drawZoomRect_ = function(direction, startX, endX, startY,
endY, prevDirection, prevEndX,
prevEndY) {
var ctx = this.canvas_ctx_;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function render has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype.render = function() {
// Draw the new X/Y grid. Lines appear crisper when pixels are rounded to
// half-integers. This prevents them from drawing in two rows/cols.
var ctx = this.elementContext;
function halfUp(x) { return Math.round(x) + 0.5; }- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function destroy has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.destroy = function() {
var removeRecursive = function(node) {
while (node.hasChildNodes()) {
removeRecursive(node.firstChild);
node.removeChild(node.firstChild);Function hsvToRGB has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.hsvToRGB = function (hue, saturation, value) {
var red;
var green;
var blue;
if (saturation === 0) {Function treatMouseOpAsClick has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Interaction.treatMouseOpAsClick = function(g, event, context) {
var clickCallback = g.attr_('clickCallback');
var pointClickCallback = g.attr_('pointClickCallback');
var selectedPoint = null;Function updateDeep has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.updateDeep = function (self, o) {
// Taken from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/384286/javascript-isdom-how-do-you-check-if-a-javascript-object-is-a-dom-object
function isNode(o) {
return (
typeof Node === "object" ? o instanceof Node :Function findClosestPoint has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.findClosestPoint = function(domX, domY) {
var minDist = Infinity;
var idx = -1;
var points = this.layout_.points;
var dist, dx, dy, point, closestPoint, closestSeries;Function createZoomHandles_ has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphRangeSelector.prototype.createZoomHandles_ = function() {
var img = new Image();
img.className = 'dygraph-rangesel-zoomhandle';
img.style.position = 'absolute';
img.style.zIndex = 10;Function DrawPolygon_ has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.DrawPolygon_ = function(sides, rotationRadians, ctx, cx, cy, color, radius, delta) {Function _drawSeries has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ctx, iter, strokeWidth, pointSize, drawPoints, drawGapPoints,
stepPlot, strategy) {Function drawZoomRect_ has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.drawZoomRect_ = function(direction, startX, endX, startY,
endY, prevDirection, prevEndX,
prevEndY) {Function setAnnotations has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype.setAnnotations = function(ann) {
// The Dygraph object's annotations aren't parsed. We parse them here and
// save a copy. If there is no parser, then the user must be using raw format.
this.annotations = [];
var parse = this.attr_('xValueParser') || function(x) { return x; };- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _evaluateLineTicks has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype._evaluateLineTicks = function() {
var i, tick, label, pos;
this.xticks = [];
for (i = 0; i < this.xTicks_.length; i++) {
tick = this.xTicks_[i];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function log has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.log = function(severity, message) {
var st;
if (typeof(printStackTrace) != 'undefined') {
// Remove uninteresting bits: logging functions and paths.
st = printStackTrace({guess:false});- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function findPosX has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.findPosX = function(obj) {
var curleft = 0;
if(obj.offsetParent) {
var copyObj = obj;
while(1) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function startPan has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.Interaction.startPan = function(event, g, context) {
var i, axis;
context.isPanning = true;
var xRange = g.xAxisRange();
context.dateRange = xRange[1] - xRange[0];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function cascadeEvents_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.cascadeEvents_ = function(name, extra_props) {
if (!name in this.eventListeners_) return true;
// QUESTION: can we use objects & prototypes to speed this up?
var e = {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function findClosestPoint has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.findClosestPoint = function(domX, domY) {
var minDist = Infinity;
var idx = -1;
var points = this.layout_.points;
var dist, dx, dy, point, closestPoint, closestSeries;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function evaluateWithError has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype.evaluateWithError = function() {
this.evaluate();
if (!(this.attr_('errorBars') || this.attr_('customBars'))) return;
// Copy over the error terms- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function EX has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
EX : function(g, name, ctx, cx, cy, color, radius) {Function CIRCLE has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
CIRCLE : function(g, name, ctx, cx, cy, color, radius) {Function DEFAULT has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DEFAULT : function(g, name, ctx, canvasx, canvasy, color, radius) {Function regularShape_ has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ctx, sides, radius, cx, cy, rotationRadians, delta) {Function PLUS has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
PLUS : function(g, name, ctx, cx, cy, color, radius) {Function findPosY has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.findPosY = function(obj) {
var curtop = 0;
if(obj.offsetParent) {
var copyObj = obj;
while(1) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function numericLinearTicks has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.numericLinearTicks = function (a, b, pixels, opts, dygraph, vals) {Function _evaluateLineCharts has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype._evaluateLineCharts = function() {
// An array to keep track of how many points will be drawn for each set.
// This will allow for the canvas renderer to not have to check every point
// for every data set since the points are added in order of the sets in
// datasets.- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _dashedLine has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._dashedLine = function(ctx, x, y, x2, y2, pattern) {Function resize has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.resize = function(width, height) {
if (this.resize_lock) {
return;
}
this.resize_lock = true;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function destroy has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.destroy = function() {
var removeRecursive = function(node) {
while (node.hasChildNodes()) {
removeRecursive(node.firstChild);
node.removeChild(node.firstChild);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function dateTicker has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.dateTicker = function (a, b, pixels, opts, dygraph, vals) {Function _drawPointsOnLine has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._drawPointsOnLine = function(ctx, pointsOnLine, drawPointCallback, setName, color, pointSize) {Function numericTicks has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.numericTicks = function (a, b, pixels, opts, dygraph, vals) {Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (typeof(self[k]) != 'object' || self[k] === null) {
self[k] = {};
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (num_ok) {
rollingData[i] = [originalData[i][0], sum / num_ok];
} else {
rollingData[i] = [originalData[i][0], null];
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (j = 1; j < inFields.length; j++) {
var val = inFields[j];
if (/^ *$/.test(val)) {
fields[j] = [null, null, null];
} else {Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (j = 1; j < inFields.length; j++) {
fields[j] = this.parseFloat_(inFields[j], i, line);
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!isNaN(prevX)) {
if (stepPlot) {
ctx.moveTo(prevX, newYs[0]);
} else {
ctx.moveTo(prevX, prevYs[0]);Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (point.name == setName) { // TODO(klausw): this is always true
if (!Dygraph.isOK(point.y)) {
prevX = NaN;
continue;
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (i = datasets.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (!datasets[i]) continue;
datasets[i][j][1] = NaN;
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (cumulative_y[x] > seriesExtremes[1]) {
seriesExtremes[1] = cumulative_y[x];
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (cumulative_y[x] < seriesExtremes[0]) {
seriesExtremes[0] = cumulative_y[x];
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (cumulative_y[x] === undefined) {
cumulative_y[x] = 0;
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (maxY < 0) maxAxisY = 0;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (num_ok) {
stddev = Math.sqrt(variance) / num_ok;
rollingData[i] = [originalData[i][0],
[sum / num_ok, sigma * stddev, sigma * stddev]];
} else {Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (attrs[property].hasOwnProperty(subProperty) && !pixelSafeOptions[subProperty]) {
requiresNewPoints = true;
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (lastDisplayed === null) {
lastDisplayed = {
tickValue: tickValue,
pixel_coord: pixel_coord
};Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (dx > 0) {
var r = (p1.canvasx - domX) / dx;
py += r * (p0.canvasy - p1.canvasy);
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (requiresNewPoints) {
break;
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (g == 7) { // one week
d.setDate(d.getDate() - d.getDay());
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (stepPlot) {
strategy.drawLine(prevCanvasX, prevCanvasY, point.canvasx, prevCanvasY);
prevCanvasX = point.canvasx;
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (stepPlot) {
newYs = [ point.y_bottom, point.y_top ];
prevY = point.y;
} else {
newYs = [ point.y_bottom, point.y_top ];Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (minY > 0) minAxisY = 0;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (var k = 0; k < annotationCols[col].length; k++) {
if (k) ann.text += "\n";
ann.text += data.getValue(i, annotationCols[col][k]);
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!Dygraph.isOK(point.y)) {
prevX = NaN;
continue;
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (j = Math.max(0, i - rollPeriod + 1); j < i + 1; j++) {
y = originalData[j][1];
if (y === null || isNaN(y)) continue;
num_ok++;
sum += originalData[j][1];Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (prev[1][1] !== null && !isNaN(prev[1][1])) {
low -= prev[1][0];
mid -= prev[1][1];
high -= prev[1][2];
count -= 1;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (actual_y === null) {
series[j] = [x, null];
continue;
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (k = 0; k < sum.length; k++) {
y = dataPoint[j][k];
if (y === null || isNaN(y)) continue;
sum[k] += y;
count[k]++;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (y === null || isNaN(y)) continue;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (spacing > pixels_per_tick) break;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (den) {
var p = value < 0 ? 0 : value, n = den;
var pm = sigma * Math.sqrt(p*(1-p)/n + sigma*sigma/(4*n*n));
var denom = 1 + sigma * sigma / den;
low = (p + sigma * sigma / (2 * den) - pm) / denom;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (j = Math.max(0, i - rollPeriod + 1); j < i + 1; j++) {
y = originalData[j][1][0];
if (y === null || isNaN(y)) continue;
num_ok++;
sum += originalData[j][1][0];Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
(typ != 'object' && !(typ == 'function' &&
typeof(o.item) == 'function')) ||
o === null ||
typeof(o.length) != 'number' ||Function getDateAxis has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.getDateAxis = function(start_time, end_time, granularity, opts, dg) {Function binarySearch has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.binarySearch = function(val, arry, abs, low, high) {Function nonTrivialStrategy has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var nonTrivialStrategy = function(renderer, ctx, color, strokeWidth, strokePattern) {Function doAnimatedZoom has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.doAnimatedZoom = function(oldXRange, newXRange, oldYRanges, newYRanges, callback) {Function V has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Date.ext={};Date.ext.util={};Date.ext.util.xPad=function(x,pad,r){if(typeof (r)=="undefined"){r=10}for(;parseInt(x,10)<r&&r>1;r/=10){x=pad.toString()+x}return x.toString()};Date.prototype.locale="en-GB";if(document.getElementsByTagName("html")&&document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0].lang){Date.prototype.locale=document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0].lang}Date.ext.locales={};Date.ext.locales.en={a:["Sun","Mon","Tue","Wed","Thu","Fri","Sat"],A:["Sunday","Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday"],b:["Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec"],B:["January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"],c:"%a %d %b %Y %T %Z",p:["AM","PM"],P:["am","pm"],x:"%d/%m/%y",X:"%T"};Date.ext.locales["en-US"]=Date.ext.locales.en;Date.ext.locales["en-US"].c="%a %d %b %Y %r %Z";Date.ext.locales["en-US"].x="%D";Date.ext.locales["en-US"].X="%r";Date.ext.locales["en-GB"]=Date.ext.locales.en;Date.ext.locales["en-AU"]=Date.ext.locales["en-GB"];Date.ext.formats={a:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].a[d.getDay()]},A:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].A[d.getDay()]},b:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].b[d.getMonth()]},B:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].B[d.getMonth()]},c:"toLocaleString",C:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(d.getFullYear()/100,10),0)},d:["getDate","0"],e:["getDate"," "],g:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(Date.ext.util.G(d)/100,10),0)},G:function(d){var y=d.getFullYear();var V=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.V(d),10);var W=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.W(d),10);if(W>V){y++}else{if(W===0&&V>=52){y--}}return y},H:["getHours","0"],I:function(d){var I=d.getHours()%12;return Date.ext.util.xPad(I===0?12:I,0)},j:function(d){var ms=d-new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/1/1 GMT");ms+=d.getTimezoneOffset()*60000;var doy=parseInt(ms/60000/60/24,10)+1;return Date.ext.util.xPad(doy,0,100)},m:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d.getMonth()+1,0)},M:["getMinutes","0"],p:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].p[d.getHours()>=12?1:0]},P:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].P[d.getHours()>=12?1:0]},S:["getSeconds","0"],u:function(d){var dow=d.getDay();return dow===0?7:dow},U:function(d){var doy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.j(d),10);var rdow=6-d.getDay();var woy=parseInt((doy+rdow)/7,10);return Date.ext.util.xPad(woy,0)},V:function(d){var woy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.W(d),10);var dow1_1=(new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/1/1")).getDay();var idow=woy+(dow1_1>4||dow1_1<=1?0:1);if(idow==53&&(new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/12/31")).getDay()<4){idow=1}else{if(idow===0){idow=Date.ext.formats.V(new Date(""+(d.getFullYear()-1)+"/12/31"))}}return Date.ext.util.xPad(idow,0)},w:"getDay",W:function(d){var doy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.j(d),10);var rdow=7-Date.ext.formats.u(d);var woy=parseInt((doy+rdow)/7,10);return Date.ext.util.xPad(woy,0,10)},y:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d.getFullYear()%100,0)},Y:"getFullYear",z:function(d){var o=d.getTimezoneOffset();var H=Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(Math.abs(o/60),10),0);var M=Date.ext.util.xPad(o%60,0);return(o>0?"-":"+")+H+M},Z:function(d){return d.toString().replace(/^.*\(([^)]+)\)$/,"$1")},"%":function(d){return"%"}};Date.ext.aggregates={c:"locale",D:"%m/%d/%y",h:"%b",n:"\n",r:"%I:%M:%S %p",R:"%H:%M",t:"\t",T:"%H:%M:%S",x:"locale",X:"locale"};Date.ext.aggregates.z=Date.ext.formats.z(new Date());Date.ext.aggregates.Z=Date.ext.formats.Z(new Date());Date.ext.unsupported={};Date.prototype.strftime=function(fmt){if(!(this.locale in Date.ext.locales)){if(this.locale.replace(/-[a-zA-Z]+$/,"") in Date.ext.locales){this.locale=this.locale.replace(/-[a-zA-Z]+$/,"")}else{this.locale="en-GB"}}var d=this;while(fmt.match(/%[cDhnrRtTxXzZ]/)){fmt=fmt.replace(/%([cDhnrRtTxXzZ])/g,function(m0,m1){var f=Date.ext.aggregates[m1];return(f=="locale"?Date.ext.locales[d.locale][m1]:f)})}var str=fmt.replace(/%([aAbBCdegGHIjmMpPSuUVwWyY%])/g,function(m0,m1){var f=Date.ext.formats[m1];if(typeof (f)=="string"){return d[f]()}else{if(typeof (f)=="function"){return f.call(d,d)}else{if(typeof (f)=="object"&&typeof (f[0])=="string"){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d[f[0]](),f[1])}else{return m1}}}});d=null;return str};- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function drawGraph_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.drawGraph_ = function() {
var start = new Date();
// This is used to set the second parameter to drawCallback, below.
var is_initial_draw = this.is_initial_draw_;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function update has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.update = function (self, o) {
if (typeof(o) != 'undefined' && o !== null) {
for (var k in o) {
if (o.hasOwnProperty(k)) {
self[k] = o[k];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function unstackPointAtIndex has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype.unstackPointAtIndex = function(idx) {
var point = this.points[idx];
// If the point is missing, no unstacking is necessary
if (!point.yval) {
return point;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function isValidPoint has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.isValidPoint = function(p, allowNaNY) {
if (!p) return false; // null or undefined object
if (p.yval === null) return false; // missing point
if (p.x === null || p.x === undefined) return false;
if (p.y === null || p.y === undefined) return false;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return mid;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return Dygraph.binarySearch(val, arry, abs, mid + 1, high);Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return self.attr_(opt);Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return data;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return parsedData;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
if (isNaN(p.x) || (!allowNaNY && isNaN(p.y))) return false;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return self.axes_[1][opt];Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return true;Function dateAxisFormatter has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.dateAxisFormatter = function(date, granularity) {
if (granularity >= Dygraph.DECADAL) {
return date.strftime('%Y');
} else if (granularity >= Dygraph.MONTHLY) {
return date.strftime('%b %y');- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function drawMiniPlot_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphRangeSelector.prototype.drawMiniPlot_ = function() {
var fillStyle = this.attr_('rangeSelectorPlotFillColor');
var strokeStyle = this.attr_('rangeSelectorPlotStrokeColor');
if (!fillStyle && !strokeStyle) {
return;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compareArrays has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.compareArrays = function(array1, array2) {
if (!Dygraph.isArrayLike(array1) || !Dygraph.isArrayLike(array2)) {
return false;
}
if (array1.length !== array2.length) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function isSupported has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.isSupported = function(canvasName) {
var canvas = null;
try {
if (typeof(canvasName) == 'undefined' || canvasName === null) {
canvas = document.createElement("canvas");- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _evaluateAnnotations has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype._evaluateAnnotations = function() {
// Add the annotations to the point to which they belong.
// Make a map from (setName, xval) to annotation for quick lookups.
var i;
var annotations = {};- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function animateSelection_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.animateSelection_ = function(direction) {
var totalSteps = 10;
var millis = 30;
if (this.fadeLevel === undefined) this.fadeLevel = 0;
if (this.animateId === undefined) this.animateId = 0;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function findMaxXindex has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.findMaxXindex = function (arr) {
if (this.maxXindex === null) {
this.maxXindex = 0;
var x2 = arr[0][0]
for (var maxi = 1; maxi < arr.length; maxi++){- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function findMinXindex has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.findMinXindex = function (arr) {
if (this.minXindex === null) {
this.minXindex = 0;
var x2 = arr[0][0]
for (var maxi = 1; maxi < arr.length; maxi++){- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function extractSeries_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.extractSeries_ = function(rawData, i, logScale) {
var series = [];
for (var j = 0; j < rawData.length; j++) {
var x = rawData[j][0];
var point = rawData[j][i];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function drawInteractiveLayer_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphRangeSelector.prototype.drawInteractiveLayer_ = function() {
var ctx = this.fgcanvas_ctx_;
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, this.canvasRect_.w, this.canvasRect_.h);
var margin = 1;
var width = this.canvasRect_.w - margin;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.findPosY = function(obj) {
var curtop = 0;
if(obj.offsetParent) {
var copyObj = obj;
while(1) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 155.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.findPosX = function(obj) {
var curleft = 0;
if(obj.offsetParent) {
var copyObj = obj;
while(1) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 155.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
onCanvasTouchEvent = function(e) {
if (e.type == 'touchstart' && e.targetTouches.length == 1) {
if (onPanStart(e.targetTouches[0])) {
Dygraph.cancelEvent(e);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 147.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
onZoomHandleTouchEvent = function(e) {
if (e.type == 'touchstart' && e.targetTouches.length == 1) {
if (onZoomStart(e.targetTouches[0])) {
Dygraph.cancelEvent(e);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 147.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.pageY = function(e) {
if (e.pageY) {
return (!e.pageY || e.pageY < 0) ? 0 : e.pageY;
} else {
var de = document;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 115.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.pageX = function(e) {
if (e.pageX) {
return (!e.pageX || e.pageX < 0) ? 0 : e.pageX;
} else {
var de = document;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 115.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.maxXindex === null) {
this.maxXindex = 0;
var x2 = arr[0][0]
for (var maxi = 1; maxi < arr.length; maxi++){
var elem = arr[maxi][0];- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.minXindex === null) {
this.minXindex = 0;
var x2 = arr[0][0]
for (var maxi = 1; maxi < arr.length; maxi++){
var elem = arr[maxi][0];- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (isDate) {
this.attrs_.xValueParser = Dygraph.dateParser;
this.attrs_.axes.x.valueFormatter = Dygraph.dateString_;
this.attrs_.axes.x.ticker = Dygraph.dateTicker;
this.attrs_.axes.x.axisLabelFormatter = Dygraph.dateAxisFormatter;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 104.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (indepType == 'date' || indepType == 'datetime') {
this.attrs_.xValueParser = Dygraph.dateParser;
this.attrs_.axes.x.valueFormatter = Dygraph.dateString_;
this.attrs_.axes.x.ticker = Dygraph.dateTicker;
this.attrs_.axes.x.axisLabelFormatter = Dygraph.dateAxisFormatter;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 104.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (context.touchDirections.x) {
g.dateWindow_ = [
c_init.dataX - swipe.dataX + (context.initialRange.x[0] - c_init.dataX) / xScale,
c_init.dataX - swipe.dataX + (context.initialRange.x[1] - c_init.dataX) / xScale
];- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else {
axis.valueWindow = [
c_init.dataY - swipe.dataY + (context.initialRange.y[0] - c_init.dataY) / yScale,
c_init.dataY - swipe.dataY + (context.initialRange.y[1] - c_init.dataY) / yScale
];- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
ctx.fillRect(this.layout_.getPlotArea().x, Math.min(startY, endY),
this.layout_.getPlotArea().w, Math.abs(endY - startY));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
ctx.clearRect(Math.min(startX, prevEndX), this.layout_.getPlotArea().y,
Math.abs(startX - prevEndX), this.layout_.getPlotArea().h);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
ctx.fillRect(Math.min(startX, endX), this.layout_.getPlotArea().y,
Math.abs(endX - startX), this.layout_.getPlotArea().h);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
ctx.clearRect(this.layout_.getPlotArea().x, Math.min(startY, prevEndY),
this.layout_.getPlotArea().w, Math.abs(startY - prevEndY));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (regionWidth < 2 && regionHeight < 2 &&
g.lastx_ !== undefined && g.lastx_ != -1) {
Dygraph.Interaction.treatMouseOpAsClick(g, event, context);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (regionWidth < 2 && regionHeight < 2 &&
g.lastx_ !== undefined && g.lastx_ != -1) {
Dygraph.Interaction.treatMouseOpAsClick(g, event, context);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (regionHeight >= 10 && context.dragDirection == Dygraph.VERTICAL) {
g.doZoomY_(Math.min(context.dragStartY, context.dragEndY),
Math.max(context.dragStartY, context.dragEndY));
context.cancelNextDblclick = true;
} else {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (regionWidth >= 10 && context.dragDirection == Dygraph.HORIZONTAL) {
g.doZoomX_(Math.min(context.dragStartX, context.dragEndX),
Math.max(context.dragStartX, context.dragEndX));
context.cancelNextDblclick = true;
} else if (regionHeight >= 10 && context.dragDirection == Dygraph.VERTICAL) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
mouseup: function(event, g, context) {
if (context.isZooming) {
Dygraph.endZoom(event, g, context);
} else if (context.isPanning) {
Dygraph.endPan(event, g, context);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
mousemove: function(event, g, context) {
if (context.isZooming) {
Dygraph.moveZoom(event, g, context);
} else if (context.isPanning) {
Dygraph.movePan(event, g, context);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.attr_('y2label') && this.dygraph_.numAxes() == 2) {
div = createRotatedDiv(2, 'dygraph-label dygraph-y2label',
this.attr_('y2label'));
this.container.appendChild(div);
this.chartLabels.y2label = div;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.attr_('ylabel')) {
div = createRotatedDiv(1, 'dygraph-label dygraph-ylabel',
this.attr_('ylabel'));
this.container.appendChild(div);
this.chartLabels.ylabel = div;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.r = (this.r < 0 || isNaN(this.r)) ? 0 : ((this.r > 255) ? 255 : this.r);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.g = (this.g < 0 || isNaN(this.g)) ? 0 : ((this.g > 255) ? 255 : this.g);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.b = (this.b < 0 || isNaN(this.b)) ? 0 : ((this.b > 255) ? 255 : this.b);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (outOfOrder) {
this.warn("DataTable is out of order; order it correctly to speed loading.");
ret.sort(function(a,b) { return a[0] - b[0]; });
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (outOfOrder) {
this.warn("CSV is out of order; order it correctly to speed loading.");
ret.sort(function(a,b) { return a[0] - b[0]; });
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
err_color = 'rgba(' + rgb.r + ',' + rgb.g + ',' + rgb.b + ',' +
fillAlpha + ')';- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
err_color = 'rgba(' + rgb.r + ',' + rgb.g + ',' + rgb.b + ',' +
fillAlpha + ')';- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (ret.length > 0 && row[0] < ret[ret.length - 1][0]) {
outOfOrder = true;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (ret.length > 0 && fields[0] < ret[ret.length - 1][0]) {
outOfOrder = true;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (abs > 0) {
// Accept if element > val, but also if prior element < val.
idx = mid - 1;
if (validIndex(idx) && arry[idx] < val) {
return mid;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (abs < 0) {
// Accept if element < val, but also if prior element > val.
idx = mid + 1;
if (validIndex(idx) && arry[idx] > val) {
return mid;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.startSegment = function() {
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.strokeStyle = color;
ctx.lineWidth = strokeWidth;
};- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.init = function() {
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.strokeStyle = color;
ctx.lineWidth = strokeWidth;
};- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var name in annotationStyle) {
if (annotationStyle.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
div.style[name] = annotationStyle[name];
}
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var name in labelStyle) {
if (labelStyle.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
div.style[name] = labelStyle[name];
}
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
ctx.rect(this.area.x, this.area.y, this.area.w, this.area.h);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
ctx.rect(this.area.x, this.area.y, this.area.w, this.area.h);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Date.ext={};Date.ext.util={};Date.ext.util.xPad=function(x,pad,r){if(typeof (r)=="undefined"){r=10}for(;parseInt(x,10)<r&&r>1;r/=10){x=pad.toString()+x}return x.toString()};Date.prototype.locale="en-GB";if(document.getElementsByTagName("html")&&document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0].lang){Date.prototype.locale=document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0].lang}Date.ext.locales={};Date.ext.locales.en={a:["Sun","Mon","Tue","Wed","Thu","Fri","Sat"],A:["Sunday","Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday"],b:["Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec"],B:["January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"],c:"%a %d %b %Y %T %Z",p:["AM","PM"],P:["am","pm"],x:"%d/%m/%y",X:"%T"};Date.ext.locales["en-US"]=Date.ext.locales.en;Date.ext.locales["en-US"].c="%a %d %b %Y %r %Z";Date.ext.locales["en-US"].x="%D";Date.ext.locales["en-US"].X="%r";Date.ext.locales["en-GB"]=Date.ext.locales.en;Date.ext.locales["en-AU"]=Date.ext.locales["en-GB"];Date.ext.formats={a:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].a[d.getDay()]},A:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].A[d.getDay()]},b:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].b[d.getMonth()]},B:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].B[d.getMonth()]},c:"toLocaleString",C:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(d.getFullYear()/100,10),0)},d:["getDate","0"],e:["getDate"," "],g:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(Date.ext.util.G(d)/100,10),0)},G:function(d){var y=d.getFullYear();var V=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.V(d),10);var W=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.W(d),10);if(W>V){y++}else{if(W===0&&V>=52){y--}}return y},H:["getHours","0"],I:function(d){var I=d.getHours()%12;return Date.ext.util.xPad(I===0?12:I,0)},j:function(d){var ms=d-new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/1/1 GMT");ms+=d.getTimezoneOffset()*60000;var doy=parseInt(ms/60000/60/24,10)+1;return Date.ext.util.xPad(doy,0,100)},m:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d.getMonth()+1,0)},M:["getMinutes","0"],p:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].p[d.getHours()>=12?1:0]},P:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].P[d.getHours()>=12?1:0]},S:["getSeconds","0"],u:function(d){var dow=d.getDay();return dow===0?7:dow},U:function(d){var doy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.j(d),10);var rdow=6-d.getDay();var woy=parseInt((doy+rdow)/7,10);return Date.ext.util.xPad(woy,0)},V:function(d){var woy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.W(d),10);var dow1_1=(new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/1/1")).getDay();var idow=woy+(dow1_1>4||dow1_1<=1?0:1);if(idow==53&&(new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/12/31")).getDay()<4){idow=1}else{if(idow===0){idow=Date.ext.formats.V(new Date(""+(d.getFullYear()-1)+"/12/31"))}}return Date.ext.util.xPad(idow,0)},w:"getDay",W:function(d){var doy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.j(d),10);var rdow=7-Date.ext.formats.u(d);var woy=parseInt((doy+rdow)/7,10);return Date.ext.util.xPad(woy,0,10)},y:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d.getFullYear()%100,0)},Y:"getFullYear",z:function(d){var o=d.getTimezoneOffset();var H=Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(Math.abs(o/60),10),0);var M=Date.ext.util.xPad(o%60,0);return(o>0?"-":"+")+H+M},Z:function(d){return d.toString().replace(/^.*\(([^)]+)\)$/,"$1")},"%":function(d){return"%"}};Date.ext.aggregates={c:"locale",D:"%m/%d/%y",h:"%b",n:"\n",r:"%I:%M:%S %p",R:"%H:%M",t:"\t",T:"%H:%M:%S",x:"locale",X:"locale"};Date.ext.aggregates.z=Date.ext.formats.z(new Date());Date.ext.aggregates.Z=Date.ext.formats.Z(new Date());Date.ext.unsupported={};Date.prototype.strftime=function(fmt){if(!(this.locale in Date.ext.locales)){if(this.locale.replace(/-[a-zA-Z]+$/,"") in Date.ext.locales){this.locale=this.locale.replace(/-[a-zA-Z]+$/,"")}else{this.locale="en-GB"}}var d=this;while(fmt.match(/%[cDhnrRtTxXzZ]/)){fmt=fmt.replace(/%([cDhnrRtTxXzZ])/g,function(m0,m1){var f=Date.ext.aggregates[m1];return(f=="locale"?Date.ext.locales[d.locale][m1]:f)})}var str=fmt.replace(/%([aAbBCdegGHIjmMpPSuUVwWyY%])/g,function(m0,m1){var f=Date.ext.formats[m1];if(typeof (f)=="string"){return d[f]()}else{if(typeof (f)=="function"){return f.call(d,d)}else{if(typeof (f)=="object"&&typeof (f[0])=="string"){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d[f[0]](),f[1])}else{return m1}}}});d=null;return str};- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.dragGetY_ = function(e, context) {
return Dygraph.pageY(e) - context.py;
};- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.toDomCoords = function(x, y, axis) {
return [ this.toDomXCoord(x), this.toDomYCoord(y, axis) ];
};- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.toDataCoords = function(x, y, axis) {
return [ this.toDataXCoord(x), this.toDataYCoord(y, axis) ];
};- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.dragGetX_ = function(e, context) {
return Dygraph.pageX(e) - context.px;
};- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76