File index.js
has 600 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*! resol-vbus | Copyright (c) 2013-present, Daniel Wippermann | MIT license */
const fs = require('fs');
const os = require('os');
const path = require('path');
Function main
has 148 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function main(options) {
const { signal, onListen, onRunning } = (options || {});
logger.debug('Starting server...');
Function main
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function main(options) {
const { signal, onListen, onRunning } = (options || {});
logger.debug('Starting server...');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function generateDLxDownloadDownloadResponse
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function generateDLxDownloadDownloadResponse(rawQuery) {
const query = {
source: rawQuery.source,
outputType: rawQuery.outputType,
dataLanguage: rawQuery.dataLanguage || 'en',
Function generateEmSimulatorSensorResponse
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function generateEmSimulatorSensorResponse(requestParams, requestBody) {
let { subAddress, sensorNr, sensorType } = requestParams;
if (isNumberString(subAddress)) {
subAddress = +subAddress;
Function generateKM2WebserviceResponse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function generateKM2WebserviceResponse(requestBody) {
const isBatchRequest = Array.isArray(requestBody);
const requests = isBatchRequest ? requestBody : [ requestBody ];
const replies = [];
for (const request of requests) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function generateKM2WebserviceResponse
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function generateKM2WebserviceResponse(requestBody) {
const isBatchRequest = Array.isArray(requestBody);
const requests = isBatchRequest ? requestBody : [ requestBody ];
const replies = [];
for (const request of requests) {
Function generateEmSimulatorSensorResponse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function generateEmSimulatorSensorResponse(requestParams, requestBody) {
let { subAddress, sensorNr, sensorType } = requestParams;
if (isNumberString(subAddress)) {
subAddress = +subAddress;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function processEmSimulatorPacket
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processEmSimulatorPacket(connection, rxPacket) {
if (((rxPacket.destinationAddress & 0xFFF0) === 0x6650) && (rxPacket.command === 0x0200) && (rxPacket.frameCount >= 10)) {
const subAddress = rxPacket.destinationAddress & 0x000F;
const state = emSimulatorStates.find(state => state.subAddress === subAddress);
Function processEmSimulatorPacket
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processEmSimulatorPacket(connection, rxPacket) {
if (((rxPacket.destinationAddress & 0xFFF0) === 0x6650) && (rxPacket.command === 0x0200) && (rxPacket.frameCount >= 10)) {
const subAddress = rxPacket.destinationAddress & 0x000F;
const state = emSimulatorStates.find(state => state.subAddress === subAddress);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function generateEmSimulatorRelayResponse
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function generateEmSimulatorRelayResponse(requestParams) {
let { subAddress, relayNr } = requestParams;
if (isNumberString(subAddress)) {
subAddress = +subAddress;
Function generateEmSimulatorRelayResponse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function generateEmSimulatorRelayResponse(requestParams) {
let { subAddress, relayNr } = requestParams;
if (isNumberString(subAddress)) {
subAddress = +subAddress;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function generateDLxDownloadDownloadResponse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function generateDLxDownloadDownloadResponse(rawQuery) {
const query = {
source: rawQuery.source,
outputType: rawQuery.outputType,
dataLanguage: rawQuery.dataLanguage || 'en',
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const onHeaderSet = async (headerSet) => {
const datecode = spec.i18n.moment(headerSet.timestamp).format('YYYYMMDD');
if (currentDatecode !== datecode) {
currentDatecode = datecode;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 207.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (const iface of Object.values(os.networkInterfaces())) {
for (const ifaceConfig of iface) {
if (ifaceConfig.family === 'IPv4') {
logger.info(' - http://' + ifaceConfig.address + ':' + config.httpPort + '/api/v1/live-data' + (ifaceConfig.internal ? ' (internal)' : ''));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const onOutputConverterReadable = function() {
let chunk;
while ((chunk = outputConverter.read()) != null) {
chunks.push(chunk);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76