Function checkRollbackStrings has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkRollbackStrings: function (rollbackStrings, patternSubstrings) {
for (var s = 0; s < rollbackStrings.length; ++s) {
var currentString = rollbackStrings[s].string; // starting with the rolled back string
var patternIndex = rollbackStrings[s].index;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function match has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
match: function (pattern, string) {
if (!wildstring.caseSensitive) {
pattern = pattern.toLowerCase();
string = string.toLowerCase();
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function match has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
match: function (pattern, string) {
if (!wildstring.caseSensitive) {
pattern = pattern.toLowerCase();
string = string.toLowerCase();
}Function checkRollbackStrings has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkRollbackStrings: function (rollbackStrings, patternSubstrings) {
for (var s = 0; s < rollbackStrings.length; ++s) {
var currentString = rollbackStrings[s].string; // starting with the rolled back string
var patternIndex = rollbackStrings[s].index;
Function replace has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
replace: function (pattern, strings) {
if (pattern === undefined || strings === undefined) {
throw new Error('wildstring.replace takes the pattern as one parameter and either a string or an array of strings as the second. You didn\'t pass enough parameters.');
}
if (typeof(strings) === typeof('')) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return false;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return wildstring.checkRollbackStrings(rollbackStrings, patternSubstrings);Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return true;