Function resolveStringDeclarations has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static resolveStringDeclarations(referenceStack, wrapper, compiledSoFar, rawStrings) {
if (wrapper.type == 'quotedstringwrapper') {
return new StringValue({
type: wrapper.type,
data: wrapper.data.map((strObj) => {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function computeUnicodeString has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static computeUnicodeString(braceDepth, obj) {
//console.log(braceDepth, JSON.stringify(obj));
if (typeof obj === 'string') return obj;
else if (obj.constructor == Array) return obj.map(o => {
if (!o) throw new Error("Expected non-null elements in " + JSON.stringify(o));- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function flatten has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function flatten(obj) {
if (typeof obj === 'object' &&
(obj.type == 'quotedstring' ||
obj.type == 'quotedstringwrapper' ||
obj.type == 'bracedstringwrapper')- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function processSpecialChars has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processSpecialChars(words) {
return words.map(word=> {
if (word.constructor == Array) {
return word.map(wordSegment => {
if (wordSegment.type == 'braced'Function computeUnicodeString has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static computeUnicodeString(braceDepth, obj) {
//console.log(braceDepth, JSON.stringify(obj));
if (typeof obj === 'string') return obj;
else if (obj.constructor == Array) return obj.map(o => {
if (!o) throw new Error("Expected non-null elements in " + JSON.stringify(o));Function concatStrings has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function concatStrings(array) {
const words = [];
for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
const obj = array[i];
if (obj == ',') words.push({type: ','});- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function flatten has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function flatten(obj) {
if (typeof obj === 'object' &&
(obj.type == 'quotedstring' ||
obj.type == 'quotedstringwrapper' ||
obj.type == 'bracedstringwrapper')Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (wordSegment.type == 'braced'
&& wordSegment.data[0]
&& wordSegment.data[0].constructor == Array
&& wordSegment.data[0].length == 1
&& typeof wordSegment.data[0][0] == 'string'Function joinSimpleString has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static joinSimpleString(data) {
if (typeof data === 'string') return data;
else if (data.constructor == Array) {
const str = [];
for (let i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
else if (typeof data.data == 'string') return data.string;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
else if (typeof obj === 'object' && obj.type == 'quotedstring') return StringValue.computeUnicodeString(braceDepth, obj.data);Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
else if (typeof obj === 'string') return obj;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return StringValue.computeUnicodeString(braceDepth, obj.data.map(o => {
if (!o) throw new Error("Expected non-null elements in " + JSON.stringify(o));
//console.log("braced", obj.data);
return StringValue.computeUnicodeString(braceDepth + 1, o)
}));Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
else if (typeof obj === 'object' && obj.unicode) return obj.unicode;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
else if (obj.constructor === Number) return obj + "";Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
if (specialChar) return specialChar(specialChar);Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
else if (typeof obj === 'object' && (obj.type == 'quotedstringwrapper' || obj.type == 'bracedstringwrapper')) return StringValue.computeUnicodeString(0, obj.data);Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
if (diacriticHandler) return diacriticHandler(escapeString.substring(2));Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
else if (obj.constructor == Number) return obj+"";Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return ({
type: 'braced',
data: flatten(obj.data)
});Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return tokens;Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const purifyEscapeExceptions = {
'i': 'i',
'j': 'j',
'oe': 'oe',
'OE': 'OE',- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76