Showing 2 of 2 total issues
Method ago_in_words_singularize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def ago_in_words_singularize(pair)
if pair.size == 1
pair.map! {|part| part[0, 2].to_i == 1 ? part.chomp('s') : part }
else
pair.map! {|part| part[0, 2].to_i == 1 ? part.chomp('s') : part[0, 2].to_i == 0 ? nil : part }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ago_in_words
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def ago_in_words
return 'a very very long time ago' if self.year < 1800
secs = Time.now - self
return 'just now' if secs > -1 && secs < 1
return '' if secs <= -1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"