File hello.all.js has 3731 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*! hellojs v1.12.0 | (c) 2012-2016 Andrew Dodson | MIT https://adodson.com/hello.js/LICENSE */
// ES5 Object.create
if (!Object.create) {
// Shim, Object createFunction post has a Cognitive Complexity of 73 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
post: function(url, data, options, callback, callbackID, timeout) {
var _this = this;
var error = _this.error;
var doc = document;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function login has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
login: function() {
// Create an object which inherits its parent as the prototype and constructs a new event chain.
var _this = this;
var utils = _this.utils;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Promise has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Promise: (function(){
/* promise states [Promises/A+ 2.1] */
var STATE_PENDING = 0; /* [Promises/A+ 2.1.1] */
var STATE_FULFILLED = 1; /* [Promises/A+ 2.1.2] */
var STATE_REJECTED = 2; /* [Promises/A+ 2.1.3] */- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function responseHandler has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
responseHandler: function(window, parent) {
var _this = this;
var p;
var location = window.location;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function xhr has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
xhr: function(method, url, headers, data, callback) {
var r = new XMLHttpRequest();
var error = this.error;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function append has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
append: function(node, attr, target) {
var n = typeof (node) === 'string' ? document.createElement(node) : node;
if (typeof (attr) === 'object') {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function api has 145 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
hello.api = function() {
// Shorthand
var _this = this;
var utils = _this.utils;Function login has 138 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
login: function() {
// Create an object which inherits its parent as the prototype and constructs a new event chain.
var _this = this;
var utils = _this.utils;Function Event has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Event: function() {
var separator = /[\s\,]+/;
// If this doesn't support getPrototype then we can't get prototype.events of the parent- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function post has 135 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
post: function(url, data, options, callback, callbackID, timeout) {
var _this = this;
var error = _this.error;
var doc = document;Function args has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
args: function(o, args) {
var p = {};
var i = 0;
var t = null;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function request has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
request: function(p, callback) {
var _this = this;
var error = _this.error;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Promise has 87 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Promise: (function(){
/* promise states [Promises/A+ 2.1] */
var STATE_PENDING = 0; /* [Promises/A+ 2.1.1] */
var STATE_FULFILLED = 1; /* [Promises/A+ 2.1.2] */
var STATE_REJECTED = 2; /* [Promises/A+ 2.1.3] */Function responseHandler has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
responseHandler: function(window, parent) {
var _this = this;
var p;
var location = window.location;Function api has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
hello.api = function() {
// Shorthand
var _this = this;
var utils = _this.utils;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function xhr has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
xhr: function(method, url, headers, data, callback) {
var r = new XMLHttpRequest();
var error = this.error;
Function request has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
request: function(p, callback) {
var _this = this;
var error = _this.error;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ((typeof (o[x]) === 'function' && o[x].test(args[i])) || (typeof (o[x]) === 'string' && (
(o[x].indexOf('s') > -1 && t === 'string') ||
(o[x].indexOf('o') > -1 && t === 'object') ||
(o[x].indexOf('i') > -1 && t === 'number') ||
(o[x].indexOf('a') > -1 && t === 'object') ||Function param has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
param: function(s, formatFunction) {
var b;
var a = {};
var m;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function logout has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
logout: function() {
var _this = this;
var utils = _this.utils;
var error = utils.error;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function store has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
store: (function() {
var a = ['localStorage', 'sessionStorage'];
var i = -1;
var prefix = 'test';Function getPath has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getPath(url) {
// Format the string if it needs it
url = url.replace(/\@\{([a-z\_\-]+)(\|.*?)?\}/gi, function(m, key, defaults) {
var val = defaults ? defaults.replace(/^\|/, '') : '';Function Event has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Event: function() {
var separator = /[\s\,]+/;
// If this doesn't support getPrototype then we can't get prototype.events of the parentFunction self has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function self() {
var CURRENT_TIME = ((new Date()).getTime() / 1e3);
var emit = function(eventName) {
hello.emit('auth.' + eventName, {Function uploadDrive has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function uploadDrive(p, callback) {
var data = {};
// Test for DOM elementFunction formatEntry has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formatEntry(a) {
var group = a.media$group;
var photo = group.media$content.length ? group.media$content[0] : {};
var mediaContent = group.media$content || [];Function Multipart has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Multipart() {
// Internal body
var body = [];
var boundary = (Math.random() * 1e10).toString(32);Function jsonp has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jsonp: function(url, callback, callbackID, timeout) {
var _this = this;
var error = _this.error;
Function store has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
store: (function() {
var a = ['localStorage', 'sessionStorage'];
var i = -1;
var prefix = 'test';- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function logout has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
logout: function() {
var _this = this;
var utils = _this.utils;
var error = utils.error;Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
else if (window.Element) {
return data instanceof window.Element && (!type || (data.tagName && data.tagName.toLowerCase() === type));
}
else {
return (!(data instanceof Object || data instanceof Array || data instanceof String || data instanceof Number) && data.tagName && data.tagName.toLowerCase() === type);Function append has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
append: function(node, attr, target) {
var n = typeof (node) === 'string' ? document.createElement(node) : node;
if (typeof (attr) === 'object') {Function dataToJSON has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dataToJSON: function(p) {
var _this = this;
var w = window;
var data = p.data;Function popup has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
hello.utils.popup = function(url, redirectUri, options) {
// Run the standard
var popup = utilPopup.call(this, url, redirectUri, options);
Function forEach has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Array.prototype.forEach = function(fun/*, thisArg*/) {
if (this === void 0 || this === null) {
throw new TypeError();
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function formatFriends has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formatFriends(o, headers, req) {
paging(o);
var r = [];
if ('feed' in o && 'entry' in o.feed) {
var token = req.query.access_token;Function extend has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
extend: function(r /*, a[, b[, ...]] */) {
// Get the arguments as an array but ommit the initial item
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1).forEach(function(a) {
if (Array.isArray(r) && Array.isArray(a)) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function args has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
args: function(o, args) {
var p = {};
var i = 0;
var t = null;Function me/share has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
'me/share': function(p, callback) {
var data = p.data;
p.data = null;
Function format has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function format(o, headers, req) {
if (typeof o === 'boolean') {
o = {success: o};
}
Function popup has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
popup: function(url, redirectUri, options) {
var documentElement = document.documentElement;
// Multi Screen Popup Positioning (http://stackoverflow.com/a/16861050)Function resolve has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var resolve = function (promise, x) {
/* sanity check arguments */ /* [Promises/A+ 2.3.1] */
if (promise === x || promise.proxy === x) {
promise.reject(new TypeError("cannot resolve promise with itself"));
return;Function init has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function(services, options) {
var utils = this.utils;
if (!services) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function formatFile has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formatFile(o, headers, req) {
if (typeof o !== 'object' ||
(typeof Blob !== 'undefined' && o instanceof Blob) ||
(typeof ArrayBuffer !== 'undefined' && o instanceof ArrayBuffer)) {Function _open has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _open(url, interactive) {
// Launch
var ref = {
closed: falseConsider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (obj === null || typeof (obj) !== 'object' || obj instanceof Date || 'nodeName' in obj || this.isBinary(obj) || (typeof FormData === 'function' && obj instanceof FormData)) {
return obj;
}Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (session && 'access_token' in session && session.access_token && 'expires' in session && session.expires > ((new Date()).getTime() / 1e3)) {
// What is different about the scopes in the session vs the scopes in the new login?
var diff = utils.diff((session.scope || '').split(SCOPE_SPLIT), (p.qs.state.scope || '').split(SCOPE_SPLIT));
if (diff.length === 0) {
Function qs has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
qs: function(url, params, formatFunction) {
if (params) {
// Set default formatting function- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function popup has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
popup: function(url, redirectUri, options) {
var documentElement = document.documentElement;
// Multi Screen Popup Positioning (http://stackoverflow.com/a/16861050)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function post has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
post: function(url, data, options, callback, callbackID, timeout) {Function isEmpty has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
isEmpty: function(obj) {
// Scalar
if (!obj)
return true;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function domInstance has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
domInstance: function(type, data) {
var test = 'HTML' + (type || '').replace(
/^[a-z]/,
function(m) {
return m.toUpperCase();- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
else if (el && data[x].name !== x) {
data[x].setAttribute('name', x);
data[x].name = x;
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (this.events[name][i]) {
// Emit on the local instance of this
callback.call(this, name, i);
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (data[x].length === 1) {
data[x] = data[x][0];
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (typeof (attr[x]) === 'object') {
for (var y in attr[x]) {if (attr[x].hasOwnProperty(y)) {
n[x][y] = attr[x][y];
}}
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (el) {
input.value = data[x].value;
}
else if (_this.domInstance(null, data[x])) {
input.value = data[x].innerHTML || data[x].innerText;Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (input) {
// Remove it.
if (!(inputs instanceof NodeList)) {
inputs = [inputs];
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
else if (_this.domInstance('input', data[x]) && data[x].type === 'file') {
continue;
}
else if (_this.domInstance('input', data[x]) ||
_this.domInstance('select', data[x]) ||Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
else if (data[x] instanceof Blob) {
f.append(x, data[x], data.name);
}
else {
f.append(x, data[x]);Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ('files' in data[x] && data[x].files.length > 0) {
f.append(x, data[x].files[0]);
}Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (('File' in w && data instanceof w.File) ||
('Blob' in w && data instanceof w.Blob) ||
('FileList' in w && data instanceof w.FileList)) {
data = {file: data};
}Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (!/\btoken\b/.test(responseType) ||
parseInt(provider.oauth.version, 10) < 2 ||
(opts.display === 'none' && provider.oauth.grant && session && session.refresh_token)) {
// Add the oauth endpointsFunction xhr has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
xhr: function(method, url, headers, data, callback) {Function createPhotoUrl has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createPhotoUrl(id, farm, server, secret, size) {Function jsonp has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jsonp: function(url, callback, callbackID, timeout) {
var _this = this;
var error = _this.error;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function diffKey has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
diffKey: function(a, b) {
if (a || !b) {
var r = {};
for (var x in a) {
// Does the property not exist?- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function hasBinary has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
hasBinary: function(data) {
for (var x in data) if (data.hasOwnProperty(x)) {
if (this.isBinary(data[x])) {
return true;
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function bind has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Function.prototype.bind = function(b) {
if (typeof this !== 'function') {
throw new TypeError('Function.prototype.bind - what is trying to be bound is not callable');
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function isBinary has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
isBinary: function(data) {
return data instanceof Object && (
(this.domInstance('input', data) && data.type === 'file') ||
('FileList' in window && data instanceof window.FileList) ||- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function clone has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clone: function(obj) {
// Does not clone DOM elements, nor Binary data, e.g. Blobs, Filelists
if (obj === null || typeof (obj) !== 'object' || obj instanceof Date || 'nodeName' in obj || this.isBinary(obj) || (typeof FormData === 'function' && obj instanceof FormData)) {
return obj;
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (options.height) {
var dualScreenTop = window.screenTop !== undefined ? window.screenTop : screen.top;
var height = screen.height || window.innerHeight || documentElement.clientHeight;
options.top = parseInt((height - options.height) / 2, 10) + dualScreenTop;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 92.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (options.width) {
var dualScreenLeft = window.screenLeft !== undefined ? window.screenLeft : screen.left;
var width = screen.width || window.innerWidth || documentElement.clientWidth;
options.left = parseInt((width - options.width) / 2, 10) + dualScreenLeft;
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 92.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
scope: {
basic: 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.me profile',
email: 'email',
birthday: '',
events: '',- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
scope: {
basic: 'wl.signin,wl.basic',
email: 'wl.emails',
birthday: 'wl.birthday',
events: 'wl.calendars',- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function formatFriends(o) {
formatError(o);
paging(o);
if (o.values) {
o.data = o.values.map(formatUser);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function formatFriends(o) {
formatError(o);
paging(o);
if (o.users) {
o.data = o.users.map(formatUser);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (o && 'meta' in o && 'error_type' in o.meta) {
o.error = {
code: o.meta.error_type,
message: o.meta.error_message
};- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (o && 'meta' in o && 'error_type' in o.meta) {
o.error = {
code: o.meta.error_type,
message: o.meta.error_message
};- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
scope: {
basic: 'basic',
photos: '',
friends: 'relationships',
publish: 'likes comments',- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
scope: {
basic: 'r_basicprofile',
email: 'r_emailaddress',
files: '',
friends: '',- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
'meetings/start/scheduled': function(p, callback) {
var meetingId = p.data.meetingId;
p.data = {};
callback('meetings/' + meetingId + '/start');
},- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
'me/like': function(p, callback) {
var id = p.data.id;
p.data = {};
callback('media/' + id + '/likes');
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var el = (_this.domInstance('input', data[x]) || _this.domInstance('textArea', data[x]) || _this.domInstance('select', data[x]));- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else if (_this.domInstance('input', data[x]) ||
_this.domInstance('select', data[x]) ||
_this.domInstance('textArea', data[x])) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
wrap: {
me: formatUser,
'me/friends': formatFriends,
'me/following': formatFriends,
'me/followers': formatFriends,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
wrap: {
me: formatUser,
'me/friends': formatFriends,
'me/contacts': formatFriends,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76