freedomjs/freedom

View on GitHub
src/provider.js

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

Function getProvider has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Provider.prototype.getProvider = function (source, identifier, args) {
  if (!this.providerCls) {
    this.debug.error('Cannot instantiate provider, since it is not provided');
    return {instance: undefined, onmsg: undefined};
  }
Severity: Minor
Found in src/provider.js - About 5 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function getProvider has 111 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Provider.prototype.getProvider = function (source, identifier, args) {
  if (!this.providerCls) {
    this.debug.error('Cannot instantiate provider, since it is not provided');
    return {instance: undefined, onmsg: undefined};
  }
Severity: Major
Found in src/provider.js - About 4 hrs to fix

Function onMessage has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Provider.prototype.onMessage = function (source, message) {
  if (source === 'control' && message.reverse) {
    this.channels[message.name] = message.channel;
    this.emit(message.channel, {
      type: 'channel announcement',
Severity: Minor
Found in src/provider.js - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function getProxyInterface has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Provider.prototype.getProxyInterface = function () {
  var func = function (p) {
    return p.getInterface();
  }.bind({}, this);

Severity: Minor
Found in src/provider.js - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File provider.js has 309 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*jslint indent:2, node:true, sloppy:true, browser:true */
var Consumer = require('./consumer');
var util = require('./util');

/**
Severity: Minor
Found in src/provider.js - About 3 hrs to fix

Function onmsg has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    onmsg: function (port, src, msg) {
      var prop, debug, args, returnPromise, ret;
      if (msg.action === 'method') {
        if (typeof this[msg.type] !== 'function') {
          port.debug.warn("Provider does not implement " + msg.type + "()!");
Severity: Major
Found in src/provider.js - About 2 hrs to fix

Function onMessage has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Provider.prototype.onMessage = function (source, message) {
  if (source === 'control' && message.reverse) {
    this.channels[message.name] = message.channel;
    this.emit(message.channel, {
      type: 'channel announcement',
Severity: Major
Found in src/provider.js - About 2 hrs to fix

Function getProxyInterface has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Provider.prototype.getProxyInterface = function () {
  var func = function (p) {
    return p.getInterface();
  }.bind({}, this);

Severity: Minor
Found in src/provider.js - About 1 hr to fix

Function getInterface has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Provider.prototype.getInterface = function () {
  if (this.iface) {
    return this.iface;
  } else {
    var sanityCheck = function (provider) {
Severity: Minor
Found in src/provider.js - About 1 hr to fix

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      providePromises: function (prov) {
        sanityCheck(prov);
        this.providerCls = prov;
        this.mode = Provider.mode.promises;
      }.bind(this)
Severity: Major
Found in src/provider.js and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
src/provider.js on lines 170..174
src/provider.js on lines 175..179

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 56.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      provideAsynchronous: function (prov) {
        sanityCheck(prov);
        this.providerCls = prov;
        this.mode = Provider.mode.asynchronous;
      }.bind(this),
Severity: Major
Found in src/provider.js and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
src/provider.js on lines 170..174
src/provider.js on lines 180..184

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 56.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      provideSynchronous: function (prov) {
        sanityCheck(prov);
        this.providerCls = prov;
        this.mode = Provider.mode.synchronous;
      }.bind(this),
Severity: Major
Found in src/provider.js and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
src/provider.js on lines 175..179
src/provider.js on lines 180..184

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 56.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Provider.prototype.toString = function () {
  if (this.emitChannel) {
    return "[Provider " + this.emitChannel + "]";
  } else {
    return "[unbound Provider]";
Severity: Minor
Found in src/provider.js and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
src/consumer.js on lines 267..273

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 52.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status