Showing 5 of 21 total issues
Function objectOf
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.objectOf = <O: TypeValidatorRecord<*>>
(typeObj: O, label?: string = 'Object'): TypeValidator<$ObjMap<O, <V>(TypeValidator<V>) => V>> => {
function object (value, _scope = label) {
const o = exports.object(value, _scope)
const typeAttrs = Object.keys(typeObj)
Function object
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function object (value, _scope = label) {
const o = exports.object(value, _scope)
const typeAttrs = Object.keys(typeObj)
const unknownAttr = Object.keys(o).find(attr => !typeAttrs.includes(attr))
if (unknownAttr) {
Function objectOf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.objectOf = <O: TypeValidatorRecord<*>>
(typeObj: O, label?: string = 'Object'): TypeValidator<$ObjMap<O, <V>(TypeValidator<V>) => V>> => {
function object (value, _scope = label) {
const o = exports.object(value, _scope)
const typeAttrs = Object.keys(typeObj)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function tupleOf_
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function tupleOf_ (...typeFuncs) {
function tuple (value: mixed, _scope = '') {
const cardinality = typeFuncs.length
if (isEmpty(value)) return typeFuncs.map(fn => fn(value))
if (Array.isArray(value) && value.length === cardinality) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function literalOf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<T: LiteralValue>(primitive: T): TypeValidator<T> => {
function literal (value, _scope = '') {
if (isEmpty(value) || (value === primitive)) return primitive
throw validatorError(literal, value, _scope)
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"