Function Metaboxes
has 507 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var Metaboxes = function() {
/**
* load all partials
*/
File llms-metaboxes.js
has 527 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* LifterLMS Admin Panel Metabox Functions
*
* @since 3.0.0
* @version 7.1.1
Function bind_llms_membership
has 114 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.bind_llms_membership = function() {
var $table = $( '.llms-mb-list._llms_content_table' );
/**
Function bind_llms_order
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.bind_llms_order = function() {
$( 'button[name="llms-refund-toggle"]' ).on( 'click', function() {
var $btn = $( this ),
Function init
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.init = function() {
var self = this;
$( '.llms-select2-post' ).each( function() {
Function bind_editables
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.bind_editables = function() {
var self = this;
function make_editable( $field ) {
Function bind_mce_fixes
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.bind_mce_fixes = function() {
// We need `wp.data` to proceed.
if ( undefined === wp.data || [ null, undefined ].includes( wp.data.select( 'core/edit-post' ) ) ) {
return;
Function make_editable
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function make_editable( $field ) {
var $label = $field.find( 'label' ).clone(),
name = $field.attr( 'data-llms-editable' ),
type = $field.attr( 'data-llms-editable-type' ),
Function bind_controllers
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.bind_controllers = function( $controllers ) {
$controllers = $controllers || $( '[data-is-controller]' );
$controllers.each( function() {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( 'remove' !== $btn.attr( 'data-action' ) ) {
$btn.text( LLMS.l10n.translate( 'Cancel' ) );
$btn.attr( 'data-action', 'remove' );
$new_row.find( 'input' ).removeAttr( 'disabled' );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( 'remove' !== $btn.attr( 'data-action' ) ) {
$btn.text( LLMS.l10n.translate( 'Cancel' ) );
$btn.attr( 'data-action', 'remove' );
$new_row.find( 'input' ).removeAttr( 'disabled' );
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76