Showing 21 of 35 total issues
Function blossom
has a Cognitive Complexity of 375 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function blossom(CHECK_OPTIMUM, CHECK_DELTA) {
// Check delta2/delta3 computation after every substage;
// only works on integer weights, slows down the algorithm to O(n^4).
if (CHECK_DELTA === undefined) CHECK_DELTA = false;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function blossom
has 563 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function blossom(CHECK_OPTIMUM, CHECK_DELTA) {
// Check delta2/delta3 computation after every substage;
// only works on integer weights, slows down the algorithm to O(n^4).
if (CHECK_DELTA === undefined) CHECK_DELTA = false;
Function maxWeightMatching
has 558 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const maxWeightMatching = (edges, maxCardinality = false) => {
// Vertices are numbered 0 .. (nvertex-1).
// Non-trivial blossoms are numbered nvertex .. (2*nvertex-1)
//
// Edges are numbered 0 .. (nedge-1).
File blossom.js
has 576 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import assert from 'assert';
import {blossomEdges} from './blossomEdges.js';
import {blossomLeaves} from './blossomLeaves.js';
import {checkDelta2} from './checkDelta2.js';
Function checkDelta3
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const checkDelta3 = ({
nvertex,
edges,
blossomparent,
blossomchilds,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function addBlossom
has 102 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const addBlossom = (base, k) => {
let v = edges[k][0];
let w = edges[k][1];
const bb = inblossom[base];
let bv = inblossom[v];
Function checkDelta2
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const checkDelta2 = ({
nvertex,
neighbend,
label,
endpoint,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function verifyOptimum
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const verifyOptimum = ({
nvertex,
edges,
maxCardinality,
nedge,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function expandBlossom
has 78 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const expandBlossom = (b, endstage) => {
console.debug(
'DEBUG: expandBlossom(' + b + ',' + endstage + ') ' + blossomchilds[b],
);
// Convert sub-blossoms into top-level blossoms.
Function augmentBlossom
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const augmentBlossom = (b, v) => {
console.debug('DEBUG: augmentBlossom(' + b + ',' + v + ')');
// Bubble up through the blossom tree from vertex v to an immediate
// sub-blossom of b.
let j;
Function scanBlossom
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const scanBlossom = (v, w) => {
console.debug('DEBUG: scanBlossom(' + v + ',' + w + ')');
// Trace back from v and w, placing breadcrumbs as we go.
const path = [];
let base = -1;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (deltatype === -1 || d < delta) {
delta = d;
deltatype = 3;
deltaedge = bestedge[b];
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (inblossom[v] === inblossom[w]) {
// This edge is internal to a blossom; ignore it
continue;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!allowedge[k]) {
kslack = slack(k);
if (kslack <= 0) {
// Edge k has zero slack => it is allowable
allowedge[k] = true;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (inblossom[w] !== b && label[inblossom[w]] === 1) {
const d = slack(k);
if (bk === -1 || d < bd) {
bk = k;
bd = d;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (label[b] === 1) {
// Top-level S-blossom: z = z + 2*delta
dualvar[b] += delta;
} else if (label[b] === 2) {
// Top-level T-blossom: z = z - 2*delta
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (bk === -1 || d < bd) {
bk = k;
bd = d;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (deltatype === -1 || d < delta) {
delta = d;
deltatype = 2;
deltaedge = bestedge[v];
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (allowedge[k]) {
if (label[inblossom[w]] === 0) {
// (C1) w is a free vertex;
// label w with T and label its mate with S (R12).
assignLabel(w, 2, p ^ 1);
Function statistics
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const statistics = (edges) => {
const nedge = edges.length;
let nvertex = 0;
let maxweight = 0;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"