Showing 679 of 1,357 total issues
Method block_textile_table
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def block_textile_table( text )
text.gsub!( TABLE_RE ) do |matches|
tatts, fullrow = $~[1..2]
tatts = pba( tatts, 'table' )
Method e
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def e(cmd, options, &proc)
full_cmd = full_cmd(cmd, options, &proc)
options[:env].each{|k,v| ENV[k]=v}
begin
Method build_without_serialization
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_without_serialization(revision, reasons)
return if revision.nil? # this will only happen in the case that there are no revisions yet
notify(:build_initiated)
previous_build = last_build
Function _generateMonthYearHeader
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_generateMonthYearHeader: function(inst, drawMonth, drawYear, minDate, maxDate,
secondary, monthNames, monthNamesShort) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if((this.options.revert == "invalid" && !dropped) || (this.options.revert == "valid" && dropped) || this.options.revert === true || ($.isFunction(this.options.revert) && this.options.revert.call(this.element, dropped))) {
var self = this;
$(this.helper).animate(this.originalPosition, parseInt(this.options.revertDuration, 10), function() {
if(self._trigger("stop", event) !== false) {
self._clear();
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ($.datepicker._datepickerShowing)
switch (event.keyCode) {
case 9: $.datepicker._hideDatepicker();
handled = false;
break; // hide on tab out
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if(!inst.snapElements[i].snapping && (ts || bs || ls || rs || first))
(inst.options.snap.snap && inst.options.snap.snap.call(inst.element, event, $.extend(inst._uiHash(), { snapItem: inst.snapElements[i].item })));
Function _generateMonthYearHeader
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_generateMonthYearHeader: function(inst, drawMonth, drawYear, minDate, maxDate,
secondary, monthNames, monthNamesShort) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ($.datepicker._datepickerShowing)
switch (event.keyCode) {
case 9: $.datepicker._hideDatepicker();
handled = false;
break; // hide on tab out
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if(!inst.snapElements[i].snapping && (ts || bs || ls || rs || first))
(inst.options.snap.snap && inst.options.snap.snap.call(inst.element, event, $.extend(inst._uiHash(), { snapItem: inst.snapElements[i].item })));
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if((this.options.revert == "invalid" && !dropped) || (this.options.revert == "valid" && dropped) || this.options.revert === true || ($.isFunction(this.options.revert) && this.options.revert.call(this.element, dropped))) {
var self = this;
$(this.helper).animate(this.originalPosition, parseInt(this.options.revertDuration, 10), function() {
if(self._trigger("stop", event) !== false) {
self._clear();
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if( this.options.tolerance == "pointer"
|| this.options.forcePointerForContainers
|| (this.options.tolerance != "pointer" && this.helperProportions[this.floating ? 'width' : 'height'] > item[this.floating ? 'width' : 'height'])
) {
return isOverElement;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if( this.options.tolerance == "pointer"
|| this.options.forcePointerForContainers
|| (this.options.tolerance != "pointer" && this.helperProportions[this.floating ? 'width' : 'height'] > item[this.floating ? 'width' : 'height'])
) {
return isOverElement;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( (!id || !cache[id] || (!isEvents && !pvt && !cache[id].data)) && getByName && data === undefined ) {
return;
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( jQuery.expr && jQuery.expr.filters ) {
jQuery.expr.filters.hidden = function( elem ) {
var width = elem.offsetWidth,
height = elem.offsetHeight;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( run_all || (!event.namespace && !handleObj.namespace) || event.namespace_re && event.namespace_re.test( handleObj.namespace ) ) {
event.data = handleObj.data;
event.handleObj = handleObj;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( typeof value === "string" && !rnoInnerhtml.test( value ) &&
( jQuery.support.leadingWhitespace || !rleadingWhitespace.test( value ) ) &&
!wrapMap[ ( rtagName.exec( value ) || ["", ""] )[1].toLowerCase() ] ) {
value = value.replace( rxhtmlTag, "<$1></$2>" );
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(project_name, scm, dir=CruiseControl::Configuration.projects_root)
raise ArgumentError, "Project Name is required" if project_name.blank?
Project.new(:name => project_name, :scm => scm).tap do |project|
raise "Project named #{project.name.inspect} already exists in #{dir}" if Project.all(dir).include?(project)
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method inline_textile_span
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def inline_textile_span( text )
QTAGS.each do |qtag_rc, ht, qtag_re, rtype|
text.gsub!( qtag_re ) do |m|
case rtype
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method scanned_chart
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scanned_chart
clean_data
CSV.foreach(@csv_file) do |row|
if row[0] == "Scanned/Reported"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"