Function _tabify
has 229 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_tabify: function( init ) {
var self = this,
o = this.options,
fragmentId = /^#.+/; // Safari 2 reports '#' for an empty hash
File jquery.ui.tabs.js
has 548 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery UI Tabs 1.8.21
*
* Copyright 2012, AUTHORS.txt (http://jqueryui.com/about)
* Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL Version 2 licenses.
Function load
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
load: function( index ) {
index = this._getIndex( index );
var self = this,
o = this.options,
a = this.anchors.eq( index )[ 0 ],
Function destroy
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
destroy: function() {
var o = this.options;
this.abort();
Function add
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( url, label, index ) {
if ( index === undefined ) {
index = this.anchors.length;
}
Function rotate
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
rotate: function( ms, continuing ) {
var self = this,
o = this.options;
var rotate = self._rotate || ( self._rotate = function( e ) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( ( $li.hasClass( "ui-tabs-selected" ) && !o.collapsible) ||
$li.hasClass( "ui-state-disabled" ) ||
$li.hasClass( "ui-state-processing" ) ||
self.panels.filter( ":animated" ).length ||
self._trigger( "select", null, self._ui( this, $show[ 0 ] ) ) === false ) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(function( $, undefined ) {
var tabId = 0,
listId = 0;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 6681.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76