Showing 2 of 2 total issues
Method try_extract_snapshot_into has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def try_extract_snapshot_into changes
snapshot_state = self.send :take_a_snapshot\
if self.is_a? Snapshotable and self.send(:should_take_a_snapshot?)
unless snapshot_state.nil?
raise NotADomainSnapshotError unless snapshot_state.is_a? Snapshot- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method prep_changes_for has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def prep_changes_for aggregates
to_return = []
aggregates.inject(to_return) do |product, aggregate|
raise ArgumentError unless aggregate.is_a? Aggregate
aggregate_change = aggregate.send(:get_changes)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"